COMBINATION OF STRETCHING WITH IMMERSION SYSTEM (COLD AND CONTRAST) ON DOMS PAIN TOLERANCE

D. Sartika
{"title":"COMBINATION OF STRETCHING WITH IMMERSION SYSTEM (COLD AND CONTRAST) ON DOMS PAIN TOLERANCE","authors":"D. Sartika","doi":"10.24843/SPJ.2021.V09.I02.P04","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: DOMS is a complaint of muscle pain experienced by athletes by exercising overloadedly. DOMS pain tolerance improvement was carried out with several interventions, in the form of a combination of stretching with cold water immersion, and stretching with contrast water immersion. The purpose of this research is to proving which comparison of physiotherapy interventions is better for DOMS pain tolerance improvement. \nMethod: The research was carried out in the Ngurah Rai athletics field in Denpasar in January 2020, experimental in nature with a pretest and post test two group design. Samples were male athletes divided into two groups, each group consisting of 9 respondens. Group I was given a combination of stretching and cold water immersion, Group II was given a combination of stretching and water immersion in contrast. Cold water temperature is 10 ?C and warm water temperature 36-40 ?C. Pain tolerance value measured by sphygmomanometer placed on the calf. The higher the value mmHg, the higher the tolerance would be. \nResult: Results in Group I, the mean pain tolerance before intervention was 153 ± 7.76 (mmHg) and the mean after intervention (48 hours) 206 ± 8.32 (mmHg) with p = 0,000 (p <0.05). In Group II, the mean pain tolerance before intervention was 154 ± 8.35 (mmHg) and after intervention (48 hours) 188.4 ± 6.95 (mmHg) with a value of p = 0,000 (p <0.05). This showed a significant increase in pain tolerance in each group. Statistical tests conducted between the two groups also showed significant differences, with a result of p = 0,000 (p <0.05) where the value of pain tolerance in Group I was better than Group II. \nConclusions: combination of stretching and cold water immersion is better than the combination of stretching and water immersion in contrast in reducing DOMS. \n  \n  \nKeywords: Delayed onset muscle soreness; stretching; cold water; contrast water immersion. \n","PeriodicalId":30774,"journal":{"name":"Sport and Fitness Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sport and Fitness Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24843/SPJ.2021.V09.I02.P04","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: DOMS is a complaint of muscle pain experienced by athletes by exercising overloadedly. DOMS pain tolerance improvement was carried out with several interventions, in the form of a combination of stretching with cold water immersion, and stretching with contrast water immersion. The purpose of this research is to proving which comparison of physiotherapy interventions is better for DOMS pain tolerance improvement. Method: The research was carried out in the Ngurah Rai athletics field in Denpasar in January 2020, experimental in nature with a pretest and post test two group design. Samples were male athletes divided into two groups, each group consisting of 9 respondens. Group I was given a combination of stretching and cold water immersion, Group II was given a combination of stretching and water immersion in contrast. Cold water temperature is 10 ?C and warm water temperature 36-40 ?C. Pain tolerance value measured by sphygmomanometer placed on the calf. The higher the value mmHg, the higher the tolerance would be. Result: Results in Group I, the mean pain tolerance before intervention was 153 ± 7.76 (mmHg) and the mean after intervention (48 hours) 206 ± 8.32 (mmHg) with p = 0,000 (p <0.05). In Group II, the mean pain tolerance before intervention was 154 ± 8.35 (mmHg) and after intervention (48 hours) 188.4 ± 6.95 (mmHg) with a value of p = 0,000 (p <0.05). This showed a significant increase in pain tolerance in each group. Statistical tests conducted between the two groups also showed significant differences, with a result of p = 0,000 (p <0.05) where the value of pain tolerance in Group I was better than Group II. Conclusions: combination of stretching and cold water immersion is better than the combination of stretching and water immersion in contrast in reducing DOMS.     Keywords: Delayed onset muscle soreness; stretching; cold water; contrast water immersion.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
拉伸与浸泡系统(冷和对比)相结合对DOMS疼痛耐受性的影响
引言:DOMS是指运动员因过度运动而产生的肌肉疼痛。DOMS疼痛耐受性的改善是通过几种干预措施进行的,形式是拉伸与冷水浸泡相结合,拉伸与对比水浸泡相结合。本研究的目的是证明哪种物理治疗干预措施的比较对改善DOMS疼痛耐受性更好。方法:本研究于2020年1月在登巴萨的Ngurah Rai田径场进行,采用前测和后测两组设计进行自然实验。样本为男性运动员,分为两组,每组由9名应答者组成。第一组采用拉伸和冷水浸泡相结合的方法,第二组则采用拉伸和水浸泡相结合。冷水温度是10?C和温水温度36-40?C.通过放置在小腿上的血压计测量疼痛耐受值。结果:I组干预前平均疼痛耐受量为153±7.76(mmHg),干预后(48小时)平均疼痛耐受力为206±8.32(mmHg,p=0.000),干预前和干预后(48小时)的平均疼痛耐受力分别为154±8.35(mmHg)和188.4±6.95(mm汞柱),其值为p=0000(p<0.05)。两组之间进行的统计测试也显示出显著差异,结果为p=0.000(p<0.05),其中第一组的疼痛耐受值优于第二组。结论:拉伸和冷水浸泡相结合在减少DOMS方面优于拉伸和水浸泡相结合。关键词:迟发性肌肉酸痛;拉伸;冷水;对比水浸泡。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊最新文献
INFLUENCE SCHROTH EXERCISE ON DECREASING THE DEGREE OF SCOLIOSIS IN TEENAGERS :NARRATIVE REVIEW The Correlation of Different Intensities Exercise on Telomere Length CORRELATION BETWEEN DURATION OF PLAYING VIDEO GAMES AND UPPER TRAPEZIUS MYOFASCIAL PAIN SYNDROME IN ADOLESCENTS CORRELATION BETWEEN SMARTPHONE USAGE DURATION AND HANDGRIP STRENGTH IN ADOLESCENTS AGED 18-24 IN TULUNGAGUNG THE EFFECT OF SLING-BASED MANUAL THERAPY AND STABILIZATION EXERCISE FOR IMPROVING CERVICAL ALIGNMENT AND MOBILITY IN INDIVIDUAL WITH FORWARD HEAD POSTURE
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1