Joint Frailty Model of Recurrent and Terminal Events in the Presence of Cure Fraction using a Bayesian Approach

Zahra Arab Borzu, A. Baghestani, E. Talebi Ghane, Aliakbar Khadem Maboudi, A. Akhavan, A. Saeedi
{"title":"Joint Frailty Model of Recurrent and Terminal Events in the Presence of Cure Fraction using a Bayesian Approach","authors":"Zahra Arab Borzu, A. Baghestani, E. Talebi Ghane, Aliakbar Khadem Maboudi, A. Akhavan, A. Saeedi","doi":"10.18502/jbe.v8i3.12306","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Recurrent event data are common in many longitudinal studies. Often, a terminating event such as death can be correlated with the recurrent event process. A shared frailty model applied to account for the association between recurrent and terminal events. In some situations, a fraction of subjects experience neither recurrent events nor death; these subjects are cured. \nMethods: In this paper, we discussed the Bayesian approach of a joint frailty model for recurrent and terminal events in the presence of cure fraction. We compared estimates of parameters in the Frequentist and Bayesian approaches via simulation studies in various sample sizes; we applied the joint frailty model in the presence of cure fraction with Frequentist and Bayesian approaches for breast cancer. \nResults: In small sample size Bayesian approach compared to Frequentist approach had a smaller standard error and mean square error, and the coverage probabilities close to nominal level of 95%. Also, in Bayesian approach, the sampling means of the estimated standard errors were close to the empirical standard error. \nConclusion: The simulation results suggested that when sample size was small, the use of Bayesian joint frailty model in the presence of cure fraction led to more efficiency in parameter estimation and statistical inference.","PeriodicalId":34310,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Biostatistics and Epidemiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Biostatistics and Epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18502/jbe.v8i3.12306","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Recurrent event data are common in many longitudinal studies. Often, a terminating event such as death can be correlated with the recurrent event process. A shared frailty model applied to account for the association between recurrent and terminal events. In some situations, a fraction of subjects experience neither recurrent events nor death; these subjects are cured. Methods: In this paper, we discussed the Bayesian approach of a joint frailty model for recurrent and terminal events in the presence of cure fraction. We compared estimates of parameters in the Frequentist and Bayesian approaches via simulation studies in various sample sizes; we applied the joint frailty model in the presence of cure fraction with Frequentist and Bayesian approaches for breast cancer. Results: In small sample size Bayesian approach compared to Frequentist approach had a smaller standard error and mean square error, and the coverage probabilities close to nominal level of 95%. Also, in Bayesian approach, the sampling means of the estimated standard errors were close to the empirical standard error. Conclusion: The simulation results suggested that when sample size was small, the use of Bayesian joint frailty model in the presence of cure fraction led to more efficiency in parameter estimation and statistical inference.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用贝叶斯方法建立复发性和终末性事件的联合衰弱模型
重复事件数据在许多纵向研究中是常见的。通常,终止事件(如死亡)可以与反复发生的事件过程相关联。用于解释复发性和终末性事件之间关联的共享脆弱性模型。在某些情况下,一小部分受试者既没有复发事件,也没有死亡;这些问题都被治愈了。方法:在本文中,我们讨论了在存在治愈分数的情况下复发和终末事件的联合脆弱性模型的贝叶斯方法。我们通过不同样本量的模拟研究,比较了频率主义者和贝叶斯方法的参数估计;我们应用关节脆弱模型在治疗分数与频率和贝叶斯方法存在乳腺癌。结果:在小样本量下,贝叶斯方法的标准误差和均方误差均小于Frequentist方法,覆盖概率接近95%的名义水平。在贝叶斯方法中,估计标准误差的抽样均值接近经验标准误差。结论:仿真结果表明,在样本量较小的情况下,使用存在治愈分数的贝叶斯关节脆性模型,参数估计和统计推断效率更高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
26
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Analysis of Copula Frailty defective models in presence of Cure Fraction The Pattern of Motorcyclists' Death Due to Accidents and a Three-year Forecast in East Azerbaijan Province, Iran: A Time Series Study Factors Affecting Loneliness in Older Adults: Evidence from Ardakan Cohort Study on Aging (ACSA) Understanding Knowledge and Behaviors Related To the Covid-19 Epidemic in Medical Students in Morocco Survival Prognostic Factors of Male Breast Cancer Using Appropriate Survival Analysis for Small Sample Size: Three Center Experience
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1