Cardiac auscultation predicts mortality in elderly patients admitted for COVID-19

N. Roig-Marín, P. Roig-Rico
{"title":"Cardiac auscultation predicts mortality in elderly patients admitted for COVID-19","authors":"N. Roig-Marín, P. Roig-Rico","doi":"10.1080/21548331.2022.2069772","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Introduction COVID-19 has had a great impact on the elderly population. All admitted patients underwent cardiac auscultation at the Emergency Department. However, to our knowledge, there is no literature that explains the implications of cardiac auscultation at the Emergency Department. Material and methods Data collection from our hospital records. Our cohort consists of 300 admissions with a mean age of 81.6 years and 50.7% men. Results Pathological cardiac auscultation at the Emergency Department was a risk factor for in-hospital mortality (RR = 1.9; 95% CI 1.3–2.8), heart failure (RR = 3.2; 95% CI = 1.8–5.6), respiratory failure (RR = 1.8; 95% CI = 1.3–2.5), acute kidney injury (RR = 2.6; 95% CI = 2–3.2), and ICU admission (RR = 3.3; 95% CI = 1.3–8.2). The findings in patients with pathological cardiac auscultation were that oxygen saturation in the Emergency Department, arterial pH, and HCO3− were significantly lower, and the ALT/GPT, LDH, and lactate determinations were significantly higher, which is compatible and correlates with the fact that the main variable is indeed a risk factor for a more severe clinical course. Among the findings from pathological auscultation, arrhythmic tone/arrhythmia was the most frequent (50%) and a risk factor for in-hospital mortality (RR = 2.3; 95% CI = 1.6–3.4). Logistic regression was performed from a multivariate analysis that showed that the initial ex novo arrhythmia correlated with pathological cardiac auscultation is an independent risk factor for in-hospital mortality. Conclusion Continuous rhythm monitoring makes it possible to detect ex novo arrhythmias and act proactively, and to offer greater care and attention to these patients who have a higher risk of in-hospital mortality and a worse prognosis. Cardiac auscultation can alert us in order to perform more electrocardiograms in these patients and thus have better monitoring.","PeriodicalId":75913,"journal":{"name":"Hospital practice","volume":"50 1","pages":"228 - 235"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hospital practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21548331.2022.2069772","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

ABSTRACT Introduction COVID-19 has had a great impact on the elderly population. All admitted patients underwent cardiac auscultation at the Emergency Department. However, to our knowledge, there is no literature that explains the implications of cardiac auscultation at the Emergency Department. Material and methods Data collection from our hospital records. Our cohort consists of 300 admissions with a mean age of 81.6 years and 50.7% men. Results Pathological cardiac auscultation at the Emergency Department was a risk factor for in-hospital mortality (RR = 1.9; 95% CI 1.3–2.8), heart failure (RR = 3.2; 95% CI = 1.8–5.6), respiratory failure (RR = 1.8; 95% CI = 1.3–2.5), acute kidney injury (RR = 2.6; 95% CI = 2–3.2), and ICU admission (RR = 3.3; 95% CI = 1.3–8.2). The findings in patients with pathological cardiac auscultation were that oxygen saturation in the Emergency Department, arterial pH, and HCO3− were significantly lower, and the ALT/GPT, LDH, and lactate determinations were significantly higher, which is compatible and correlates with the fact that the main variable is indeed a risk factor for a more severe clinical course. Among the findings from pathological auscultation, arrhythmic tone/arrhythmia was the most frequent (50%) and a risk factor for in-hospital mortality (RR = 2.3; 95% CI = 1.6–3.4). Logistic regression was performed from a multivariate analysis that showed that the initial ex novo arrhythmia correlated with pathological cardiac auscultation is an independent risk factor for in-hospital mortality. Conclusion Continuous rhythm monitoring makes it possible to detect ex novo arrhythmias and act proactively, and to offer greater care and attention to these patients who have a higher risk of in-hospital mortality and a worse prognosis. Cardiac auscultation can alert us in order to perform more electrocardiograms in these patients and thus have better monitoring.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
心脏听诊预测因新冠肺炎住院的老年患者的死亡率
新冠肺炎疫情对老年人群的影响很大。所有入院患者均在急诊科接受心脏听诊。然而,据我们所知,没有文献解释急诊部门心脏听诊的含义。材料和方法从我院病历中收集资料。我们的队列包括300名入院患者,平均年龄为81.6岁,50.7%为男性。结果急诊科病理性心脏听诊是院内死亡的危险因素(RR = 1.9;95% CI 1.3-2.8)、心力衰竭(RR = 3.2;95% CI = 1.8 - 5.6)、呼吸衰竭(RR = 1.8;95% CI = 1.3-2.5),急性肾损伤(RR = 2.6;95% CI = 2-3.2), ICU住院(RR = 3.3;95% ci = 1.3-8.2)。病理性心脏听诊患者急诊科血氧饱和度、动脉pH、HCO3−明显降低,ALT/GPT、LDH、乳酸测定明显升高,这与主变量确实是更严重临床病程的危险因素相一致,并与之相关。在病理听诊结果中,心律失常/心律失常是最常见的(50%),也是院内死亡的危险因素(RR = 2.3;95% ci = 1.6-3.4)。通过多变量分析进行Logistic回归分析,发现与病理性心脏听诊相关的初始新生心律失常是院内死亡的独立危险因素。结论持续心律监测可及时发现新生心律失常并采取积极措施,对院内死亡风险较高、预后较差的患者给予更多的护理和重视。心脏听诊可以提醒我们,以便对这些患者进行更多的心电图检查,从而更好地监测。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Benign acute myositis in an adult: case-based review. Hospitalists' COVID-19 management roles in hospitals without infectious disease specialists. Cardiac rehabilitation. Analysis of SARS-CoV-2 variants B.1.617: host tropism, proteolytic activation, cell-cell fusion, and neutralization sensitivity. How could perioperative anxiety be addressed via surgical team communication approaches? Findings from a scoping review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1