Comparison of predictability on adverse events among different assessment tools in elderly discharged inpatients

Linlin Fu, Qing Wang, Weihua Lyu
{"title":"Comparison of predictability on adverse events among different assessment tools in elderly discharged inpatients","authors":"Linlin Fu, Qing Wang, Weihua Lyu","doi":"10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.0254-9026.2019.12.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective \nTo investigate the predictability on adverse events(re-hospitalization and death)in elderly discharged inpatients among frailty phenotype(FP), frail scale(FS)and clinical frailty scale(CFS), in order to screen the simple and feasible frailty assessment tools for elderly discharged inpatients. \n \n \nMethods \nElderly discharged inpatients aged 65 years and over were recruited for this prospective cohort study.And they underwent frailty assessment by using FP, FS and CFS, respectively.Patients were followed up for more than 6 months after discharge, and adverse events including re-hospitalization or death after discharge were recorded.Cox regression model was adopted to evaluate the relationship between frailty and death or re-hospitalization.Predictive effects of three assessment methods on adverse events were compared by using receiver operating characteristic(ROC). \n \n \nResults \nA total of 527 elderly patients aged(84.1±6.0)years with males of 61.9%(326/527)were successfully followed up.The detection rate of frailty by FP and FS evaluation tools was 26.0%(137/527)and 26.0%(137/527), respectively.The detection rate of moderate and severe frailty by CFS was 25.2%(133/527). The Cox regression model showed that the mortality was significantly higher in frailty patients by FP, FS, and CFS than in the non-frailty patients(HR=3.72, 2.95 and 3.90, P=0.017, 0.016 and 0.002)after adjusting for age, smoking, co-morbidity and other variable; and that the re-hospitalization rate was significant higher in frailty patients by FP and CFS than in the non-frailty patients(HR=1.81 and 1.69, P=0.000 and 0.002). The areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve(AUC)of FP, FS and CFS for predicting death and re-hospitalization were 0.691, 0.645, 0.728 on death, and 0.570, 0.579, 0.602 on re-hospitalization(all P<0.01), respectively. \n \n \nConclusions \nAll three assessment tools of FP, FS and CFS have predictive effects on death in elderly inpatients with frailty, and CFS has better predictive effect than the other two tools.But FP, FS and CFS have poor predictive effect on re-hospitalization. \n \n \nKey words: \nFrailty; Risk assessment; Death; Patient readmission","PeriodicalId":9997,"journal":{"name":"中华老年医学杂志","volume":"38 1","pages":"1329-1333"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中华老年医学杂志","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.0254-9026.2019.12.003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Objective To investigate the predictability on adverse events(re-hospitalization and death)in elderly discharged inpatients among frailty phenotype(FP), frail scale(FS)and clinical frailty scale(CFS), in order to screen the simple and feasible frailty assessment tools for elderly discharged inpatients. Methods Elderly discharged inpatients aged 65 years and over were recruited for this prospective cohort study.And they underwent frailty assessment by using FP, FS and CFS, respectively.Patients were followed up for more than 6 months after discharge, and adverse events including re-hospitalization or death after discharge were recorded.Cox regression model was adopted to evaluate the relationship between frailty and death or re-hospitalization.Predictive effects of three assessment methods on adverse events were compared by using receiver operating characteristic(ROC). Results A total of 527 elderly patients aged(84.1±6.0)years with males of 61.9%(326/527)were successfully followed up.The detection rate of frailty by FP and FS evaluation tools was 26.0%(137/527)and 26.0%(137/527), respectively.The detection rate of moderate and severe frailty by CFS was 25.2%(133/527). The Cox regression model showed that the mortality was significantly higher in frailty patients by FP, FS, and CFS than in the non-frailty patients(HR=3.72, 2.95 and 3.90, P=0.017, 0.016 and 0.002)after adjusting for age, smoking, co-morbidity and other variable; and that the re-hospitalization rate was significant higher in frailty patients by FP and CFS than in the non-frailty patients(HR=1.81 and 1.69, P=0.000 and 0.002). The areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve(AUC)of FP, FS and CFS for predicting death and re-hospitalization were 0.691, 0.645, 0.728 on death, and 0.570, 0.579, 0.602 on re-hospitalization(all P<0.01), respectively. Conclusions All three assessment tools of FP, FS and CFS have predictive effects on death in elderly inpatients with frailty, and CFS has better predictive effect than the other two tools.But FP, FS and CFS have poor predictive effect on re-hospitalization. Key words: Frailty; Risk assessment; Death; Patient readmission
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
不同评估工具对老年出院住院患者不良事件可预测性的比较
目的探讨衰弱表型(FP)、衰弱量表(FS)和临床衰弱量表(CFS)对老年出院住院患者不良事件(再住院和死亡)的可预测性,筛选简单可行的老年出院住院患者衰弱评估工具。方法招募65岁及以上高龄出院住院患者进行前瞻性队列研究。分别采用FP、FS和CFS进行衰弱评价。出院后随访6个月以上,记录出院后再次住院或死亡等不良事件。采用Cox回归模型评价虚弱与死亡或再住院的关系。采用受试者工作特征(ROC)比较三种评估方法对不良事件的预测效果。结果共成功随访老年患者527例,年龄(84.1±6.0)岁,男性占61.9%(326/527)。FP和FS评价工具对脆性的检出率分别为26.0%(137/527)和26.0%(137/527)。CFS对中重度虚弱的检出率为25.2%(133/527)。Cox回归模型显示,调整年龄、吸烟、共发病等因素后,FP、FS和CFS组虚弱患者的死亡率显著高于非虚弱患者(HR=3.72、2.95和3.90,P=0.017、0.016和0.002);虚弱患者因FP和CFS再住院率显著高于非虚弱患者(HR分别为1.81和1.69,P分别为0.000和0.002)。FP、FS和CFS预测死亡和再住院的受试者工作特征曲线下面积(AUC)分别为死亡0.691、0.645、0.728,再住院0.570、0.579、0.602 (P均<0.01)。结论FP、FS和CFS 3种评估工具对老年住院虚弱患者的死亡均有预测作用,且CFS的预测效果优于其他两种工具。但FP、FS和CFS对再住院的预测作用较差。关键词:虚弱;风险评估;死亡;病人重新接纳
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8523
期刊介绍:
期刊最新文献
Key points for the prevention and treatment of the novel coronavirus pneumonia in the elderly Analysis of difference in oral bacteria flora in saliva among elderly people in longevity zone of Guangxi Progress in research on venous thromboembolism in elderly patients with lung cancer Clinical significance of the monocyte to high-density lipoprotein cholesterol ratio in the assessment of imperfect ST-segment resolution in elderly patients with acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction after percutaneous coronary intervention Analysis of bone mineral density and bone metabolism in elderly hip fracture patients of different genders
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1