Characterizing Microbial Cross-Contamination on Large Surfaces Using a Traditional “Cloth and Bucket” Disinfection Method

Q4 Medicine Food Protection Trends Pub Date : 2020-11-01 DOI:10.4315/1541-9576-40.6.392
Rebecca M. Goulter, J. Clayton, Robin Grant Moore, J. Bradshaw, Jason W. Frye, Esa J. Puntch, L. Jaykus
{"title":"Characterizing Microbial Cross-Contamination on Large Surfaces Using a Traditional “Cloth and Bucket” Disinfection Method","authors":"Rebecca M. Goulter, J. Clayton, Robin Grant Moore, J. Bradshaw, Jason W. Frye, Esa J. Puntch, L. Jaykus","doi":"10.4315/1541-9576-40.6.392","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Use of buckets containing soiled disinfectant solutions for disinfection is regularly practiced in food service and other settings. This study characterized microbial transfer of vegetative bacteria (Listeria innocua and Escherichia coli), spores (Bacillus cereus), and a virus (MS2 bacteriophage), to large surfaces, using a “cloth and bucket” method with a commonly used quaternaryammonium compound (QAC) disinfectant (with or without 5% soil) and a phosphate-buffered-saline (PBS) control. We also characterized concentrations of organisms in the bucket solutions after wiping. With disinfectant (with or without soil), there was little transfer of vegetative bacteria. Transfer occurred readily with the PBS control (4.8 ± 1.0 and 3.3 ± 0.9 log CFU/surface for Listeria innocua and Escherichia coli, respectively). Spores were transferred efficiently, regardless of whether PBS or QAC was used or whether test was with or without soil (range, 6.5 to 7.8 log CFU/surface). MS2 bacteriophage appeared to be eliminated relatively quickly. When the QAC did not inactivate the organism (regardless of soil load), high microbial loads (> 87.9% of initial inoculum) were detected in the bucket solution after wiping experiments. This study suggests that reusable cloth can potentially promote contamination of surfaces, sometimes in the presence of disinfectant. This is concerning for food service and other settings in which disinfection practices rely on the cloth and bucket system.","PeriodicalId":38649,"journal":{"name":"Food Protection Trends","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Food Protection Trends","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4315/1541-9576-40.6.392","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Use of buckets containing soiled disinfectant solutions for disinfection is regularly practiced in food service and other settings. This study characterized microbial transfer of vegetative bacteria (Listeria innocua and Escherichia coli), spores (Bacillus cereus), and a virus (MS2 bacteriophage), to large surfaces, using a “cloth and bucket” method with a commonly used quaternaryammonium compound (QAC) disinfectant (with or without 5% soil) and a phosphate-buffered-saline (PBS) control. We also characterized concentrations of organisms in the bucket solutions after wiping. With disinfectant (with or without soil), there was little transfer of vegetative bacteria. Transfer occurred readily with the PBS control (4.8 ± 1.0 and 3.3 ± 0.9 log CFU/surface for Listeria innocua and Escherichia coli, respectively). Spores were transferred efficiently, regardless of whether PBS or QAC was used or whether test was with or without soil (range, 6.5 to 7.8 log CFU/surface). MS2 bacteriophage appeared to be eliminated relatively quickly. When the QAC did not inactivate the organism (regardless of soil load), high microbial loads (> 87.9% of initial inoculum) were detected in the bucket solution after wiping experiments. This study suggests that reusable cloth can potentially promote contamination of surfaces, sometimes in the presence of disinfectant. This is concerning for food service and other settings in which disinfection practices rely on the cloth and bucket system.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
用传统的“布桶”消毒法测定大表面微生物交叉污染
在食品服务和其他环境中,经常使用装有污染的消毒液溶液的桶进行消毒。本研究采用“布桶”方法,采用常用的季铵盐化合物(QAC)消毒剂(含或不含5%土壤)和磷酸盐缓冲盐水(PBS)对照,研究了营养性细菌(无性李斯特菌和大肠杆菌)、孢子(蜡样芽孢杆菌)和病毒(MS2噬菌体)在大表面上的微生物转移。我们还描述了擦拭后桶溶液中的生物浓度。使用消毒剂(含或不含土壤)时,营养细菌的转移很少。在PBS对照中很容易发生转移(无害李斯特菌和大肠杆菌分别为4.8±1.0和3.3±0.9 log CFU/表面)。无论是否使用PBS或QAC,也无论测试是否有土壤(范围为6.5至7.8 log CFU/surface),孢子都能有效转移。MS2噬菌体似乎被清除得相对较快。当QAC不灭活微生物时(无论土壤负荷如何),擦拭实验后水桶溶液中检测到高微生物负荷(>为初始接种量的87.9%)。这项研究表明,可重复使用的布可能会促进表面污染,有时在消毒剂存在的情况下。这与食品服务和其他依赖布和桶系统消毒的环境有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Food Protection Trends
Food Protection Trends Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Food Science
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
25
期刊最新文献
Examining Age and Food Irradiation Knowledge as Influential Factors on Purchase of Irradiated Foods - United States, August 2022. Focus Groups Exploring U.S. Adults' Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices Related to Irradiation as a Food Safety Intervention, 2021. Evaluating Misinformation on YouTube about Washing Produce Before and During the COVID-19 Pandemi Minimally Processed Vegetables: Consumer Profile, Consumption Habits, and Perceptions of Microbiological Risk Perceptions of Risk, Control, and Responsibility Regarding Food Safety among Consumers in Lebanon
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1