Patient Pathway Across Portuguese Emergency Network: What Matters for Health Outcomes?

Gazeta Medica Pub Date : 2022-12-30 DOI:10.29315/gm.v1i1.509
João Mendes
{"title":"Patient Pathway Across Portuguese Emergency Network: What Matters for Health Outcomes?","authors":"João Mendes","doi":"10.29315/gm.v1i1.509","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"INTRODUCTION: Regional inequalities in access and health results have become a relevant issue in all developed countries. In this paper it was sought to evaluate possible disparities due to geographical localization, in cases of acute and severe illness.MATERIAL AND METHODS: By accessing the logbook of the emergency room of the polyvalent emergency service (PES) in Viseu, Portugal, detailed information was extracted from 2812 episodes that occurred during 2019. This sample also includes users from two medical and surgical emergency services (MSES), which serve Guarda and Covilhã regions, as well as three basic emergency services (BES). It was used a retrospective design and logistic regression models were estimated to assess differences in mortality.RESULTS: Our data prove the existence of a protective effect of BES (p-value = 0.031) and an adverse impact of distance, particularly in cases of stroke (p-value = 0.027). In addition, we did not find difference in 30-day mortality between patients from Guarda, Covilhã and Viseu regions (p-value = 0.536).CONCLUSION: This study is pioneer in demonstrating the importance of BES. Furthermore, it confirms that the creation of reference centers contributes to the improvement of outcomes, with no difference in mortality of patients who are initially approached by lower differentiation centers.","PeriodicalId":32321,"journal":{"name":"Gazeta Medica","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gazeta Medica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29315/gm.v1i1.509","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Regional inequalities in access and health results have become a relevant issue in all developed countries. In this paper it was sought to evaluate possible disparities due to geographical localization, in cases of acute and severe illness.MATERIAL AND METHODS: By accessing the logbook of the emergency room of the polyvalent emergency service (PES) in Viseu, Portugal, detailed information was extracted from 2812 episodes that occurred during 2019. This sample also includes users from two medical and surgical emergency services (MSES), which serve Guarda and Covilhã regions, as well as three basic emergency services (BES). It was used a retrospective design and logistic regression models were estimated to assess differences in mortality.RESULTS: Our data prove the existence of a protective effect of BES (p-value = 0.031) and an adverse impact of distance, particularly in cases of stroke (p-value = 0.027). In addition, we did not find difference in 30-day mortality between patients from Guarda, Covilhã and Viseu regions (p-value = 0.536).CONCLUSION: This study is pioneer in demonstrating the importance of BES. Furthermore, it confirms that the creation of reference centers contributes to the improvement of outcomes, with no difference in mortality of patients who are initially approached by lower differentiation centers.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
葡萄牙急诊网络的患者路径:什么对健康结果很重要?
引言:在所有发达国家,在获取和健康结果方面的区域不平等已成为一个相关问题。在这篇论文中,试图评估在急性和严重疾病的情况下,由于地理定位而可能存在的差异。材料和方法:通过访问葡萄牙维塞乌多价急救服务(PES)急诊室的日志,从2019年发生的2812起事件中提取了详细信息。该样本还包括来自两个医疗和外科急救服务(MSES)的用户,这两个服务于瓜尔达和科维良地区,以及三个基本急救服务(BES)。采用回顾性设计和逻辑回归模型评估死亡率差异。结果:我们的数据证明了BES的保护作用(p值=0.031)和距离的不利影响,特别是在中风病例中(p值=0.027)。此外,我们没有发现瓜尔达、科维良和维塞乌地区患者30天死亡率的差异(p值=0.536)。结论:本研究是证明BES重要性的先驱。此外,它证实了参考中心的建立有助于改善结果,而最初由低分化中心接触的患者的死亡率没有差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
45
审稿时长
9 weeks
期刊最新文献
Comparing Kidney Care during the Pandemic in Hospitalized Non-COVID-19 Patients Experiências Adversas na Infância e Perturbação de Hiperatividade e Défice de Atenção: Uma Relação por Descodificar Avaliação de Disfunção Tiroideia e da Suplementação de Iodo na Pré-Conceção e Gravidez Meias Elásticas Compressivas na Prevenção da Síndrome Pós-trombótica: Assim Tão Evidente? A Importância da Prevenção Quinquenária: Uma Reflexão Crítica
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1