Relationships Among Phantom Limb Pain, Peripheral Sensations, and Cognition in People with Lower-Limb Loss

IF 0.4 Q4 ORTHOPEDICS Journal of Prosthetics and Orthotics Pub Date : 2021-04-29 DOI:10.1097/JPO.0000000000000373
C. K. Wong, C. Wong
{"title":"Relationships Among Phantom Limb Pain, Peripheral Sensations, and Cognition in People with Lower-Limb Loss","authors":"C. K. Wong, C. Wong","doi":"10.1097/JPO.0000000000000373","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Introduction After amputation, altered sensory input leads to cortical reorganization that partly explains phantom limb pain (PLP). However, many factors impact the PLP phenomenon, and modern conceptualizations of chronic pain including PLP integrate both peripheral inputs and central interpretation. Clinicians without functional MRI could benefit from clinical measures related to PLP to assess clinical presentations. The purpose of this pilot study was to identify peripheral sensation and cognition measures related to PLP to inform outcome measure selection in future PLP research. Methods This cross-sectional analysis included people with PLP of any age, sex, and amputation cause or level. Assessments included patient-reported residual limb pain and PLP using the Prosthesis Evaluation Questionnaire, peripheral sensation measures (light touch, temperature, vibration, two-point discrimination), and cognition measures (laterality recognition, trail making, clock drawing). Unadjusted Spearman ρ coefficients were reported. Results Eleven volunteers (48.5 ± 13.2 years) with lower-limb amputations (seven transtibial) of various causes (nine medical) participated. More severe PLP symptoms were associated with impaired peripheral sensation (light touch, ρ = 0.514; temperature, ρ = 0.756) and poorer cognition (laterality recognition, ρ = 0.524; trail making, ρ = 0.565). Residual limb pain was not correlated with cognition measures (ρ < 0.4). Conclusions This pilot study identified clinical measures assessing cognition and peripheral sensation impairments associated with worse PLP symptoms. Phantom limb pain was related to temperature and light touch sensation measures, but two-point discrimination was not associated with PLP consistent with past research. Laterality recognition was associated with PLP per prior research, and the association of PLP with the Trail Making Test in this pilot study suggests that the Trail Making Test may be an additional cognition measure potentially useful in future clinical research to document the PLP experience.","PeriodicalId":53702,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Prosthetics and Orthotics","volume":"34 1","pages":"89 - 94"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Prosthetics and Orthotics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JPO.0000000000000373","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

ABSTRACT Introduction After amputation, altered sensory input leads to cortical reorganization that partly explains phantom limb pain (PLP). However, many factors impact the PLP phenomenon, and modern conceptualizations of chronic pain including PLP integrate both peripheral inputs and central interpretation. Clinicians without functional MRI could benefit from clinical measures related to PLP to assess clinical presentations. The purpose of this pilot study was to identify peripheral sensation and cognition measures related to PLP to inform outcome measure selection in future PLP research. Methods This cross-sectional analysis included people with PLP of any age, sex, and amputation cause or level. Assessments included patient-reported residual limb pain and PLP using the Prosthesis Evaluation Questionnaire, peripheral sensation measures (light touch, temperature, vibration, two-point discrimination), and cognition measures (laterality recognition, trail making, clock drawing). Unadjusted Spearman ρ coefficients were reported. Results Eleven volunteers (48.5 ± 13.2 years) with lower-limb amputations (seven transtibial) of various causes (nine medical) participated. More severe PLP symptoms were associated with impaired peripheral sensation (light touch, ρ = 0.514; temperature, ρ = 0.756) and poorer cognition (laterality recognition, ρ = 0.524; trail making, ρ = 0.565). Residual limb pain was not correlated with cognition measures (ρ < 0.4). Conclusions This pilot study identified clinical measures assessing cognition and peripheral sensation impairments associated with worse PLP symptoms. Phantom limb pain was related to temperature and light touch sensation measures, but two-point discrimination was not associated with PLP consistent with past research. Laterality recognition was associated with PLP per prior research, and the association of PLP with the Trail Making Test in this pilot study suggests that the Trail Making Test may be an additional cognition measure potentially useful in future clinical research to document the PLP experience.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
下肢缺失患者幻肢疼痛、外周感觉和认知之间的关系
摘要引言截肢后,感觉输入的改变导致皮层重组,这在一定程度上解释了幻肢疼痛(PLP)。然而,许多因素影响PLP现象,包括PLP在内的慢性疼痛的现代概念化融合了外围输入和中心解释。没有功能性MRI的临床医生可以从与PLP相关的临床测量中受益,以评估临床表现。这项初步研究的目的是确定与PLP相关的外周感觉和认知指标,为未来PLP研究的结果指标选择提供信息。方法该横断面分析包括任何年龄、性别、截肢原因或程度的PLP患者。评估包括患者报告的残肢疼痛和PLP,使用假体评估问卷、周围感觉测量(轻度触摸、温度、振动、两点辨别)和认知测量(偏侧识别、轨迹制作、时钟绘制)。报告了未经调整的斯皮尔曼ρ系数。结果11名志愿者(48.5±13.2岁)参与了各种原因的下肢截肢手术(7例经胫骨)(9例医学)。更严重的PLP症状与周围感觉受损(轻度触摸,ρ=0.514;温度,ρ=0.756)和认知能力较差(偏侧性识别,ρ=0.524;追踪,ρ=0.565)有关。残余肢体疼痛与认知测量值无关(ρ<0.4)。结论这项初步研究确定了评估认知和周围感觉的临床测量值与PLP症状恶化相关的损伤。幻影肢体疼痛与温度和光感测量有关,但与过去的研究一致,两点辨别与PLP无关。根据先前的研究,侧性识别与PLP相关,在这项试点研究中,PLP与轨迹测试的关联表明,轨迹测试可能是一种额外的认知测量,在未来的临床研究中可能有用,以记录PLP经验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Prosthetics and Orthotics
Journal of Prosthetics and Orthotics Medicine-Rehabilitation
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
16.70%
发文量
59
期刊介绍: Published quarterly by the AAOP, JPO: Journal of Prosthetics and Orthotics provides information on new devices, fitting and fabrication techniques, and patient management experiences. The focus is on prosthetics and orthotics, with timely reports from related fields such as orthopaedic research, occupational therapy, physical therapy, orthopaedic surgery, amputation surgery, physical medicine, biomedical engineering, psychology, ethics, and gait analysis. Each issue contains research-based articles reviewed and approved by a highly qualified editorial board and an Academy self-study quiz offering two PCE''s.
期刊最新文献
Comparison of Physical Therapy and Orthosis on Clinical Outcomes in Patients with Medial Knee Osteoarthritis Blood Pressure Regulation in Persons with a Transfemoral Amputation: Effects of Wearing a Prosthesis Motion Analysis of a Frontal Plane Adaptable Prosthetic Foot Immediate Effect of Soft Lumbosacral Orthosis on Trunk Stability and Upper-Limb Functionality in Children with Cerebral Palsy Importance of Health Policy and Systems Research for Strengthening Rehabilitation in Health Systems: A Call to Action to Accelerate Progress.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1