Beyond the 'Balance of Nature': Pastoralists' Alternative Perspectives on Sustainability

IF 1.1 Q2 ANTHROPOLOGY Nomadic Peoples Pub Date : 2021-03-01 DOI:10.3197/NP.2021.250110
I. Scoones
{"title":"Beyond the 'Balance of Nature': Pastoralists' Alternative Perspectives on Sustainability","authors":"I. Scoones","doi":"10.3197/NP.2021.250110","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"David Attenborough’s mission to restore the balance of nature in the documentary, A Life on Our Planet: My Witness Statement, is at once inspiring and concerning. What if the balance of nature doesn’t exist? What if this mission is misplaced? The film is full of the familiar tropes of nature documentaries, once again repeated with Attenborough’s familiar gravitas. Human beings have overrun the world. Wilderness has been destroyed. Stability and balance – the ‘security and stability of the Holocene’ – have been upset. Our singular world – invoking the iconic picture of ‘only one earth’ (Ward and Dubos 1972) seen from space – becomes threatened. Catastrophe and crisis are the impending result. Unless of course ‘we’ (a rather generic humanity) can restore stability through protecting biodiversity; in his words, ‘rewilding the world’. Those of us brought up on Attenborough’s amazing natural history programmes have got used to the standard storyline, centred on a Malthusian narrative. Too many humans can damage the awe-inspiring, pristine nature depicted in the films. Yet, unlike most of his previous documentaries, this one goes a step further. An hour of the now-familiar narrative culminates in some tragic yet bizarre imagery of dying walruses in front of an appalled Davos audience. And then the argument shifts. In this very personal testimony, a 93-year-old Attenborough argues how we have to rediscover how to be sustainable: moving from being ‘apart from nature to being part of nature’; ‘working with nature rather than against it’. In guarded tones for sure, a more critical perspective is offered: one that identifies capitalism – without naming it here, although he does so in a BBC interview1 – and the structural relations of politics and economy as the driving forces behind the destruction of the non-human world. The inevitability of the countdown to doomsday can be challenged, he argues, even if ultimately by some odd techno-utopian solutions such as remote-controlled drones harvesting forests. Nature will and must endure, he proclaims: stability will be restored, with or without humans.","PeriodicalId":19318,"journal":{"name":"Nomadic Peoples","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nomadic Peoples","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3197/NP.2021.250110","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

David Attenborough’s mission to restore the balance of nature in the documentary, A Life on Our Planet: My Witness Statement, is at once inspiring and concerning. What if the balance of nature doesn’t exist? What if this mission is misplaced? The film is full of the familiar tropes of nature documentaries, once again repeated with Attenborough’s familiar gravitas. Human beings have overrun the world. Wilderness has been destroyed. Stability and balance – the ‘security and stability of the Holocene’ – have been upset. Our singular world – invoking the iconic picture of ‘only one earth’ (Ward and Dubos 1972) seen from space – becomes threatened. Catastrophe and crisis are the impending result. Unless of course ‘we’ (a rather generic humanity) can restore stability through protecting biodiversity; in his words, ‘rewilding the world’. Those of us brought up on Attenborough’s amazing natural history programmes have got used to the standard storyline, centred on a Malthusian narrative. Too many humans can damage the awe-inspiring, pristine nature depicted in the films. Yet, unlike most of his previous documentaries, this one goes a step further. An hour of the now-familiar narrative culminates in some tragic yet bizarre imagery of dying walruses in front of an appalled Davos audience. And then the argument shifts. In this very personal testimony, a 93-year-old Attenborough argues how we have to rediscover how to be sustainable: moving from being ‘apart from nature to being part of nature’; ‘working with nature rather than against it’. In guarded tones for sure, a more critical perspective is offered: one that identifies capitalism – without naming it here, although he does so in a BBC interview1 – and the structural relations of politics and economy as the driving forces behind the destruction of the non-human world. The inevitability of the countdown to doomsday can be challenged, he argues, even if ultimately by some odd techno-utopian solutions such as remote-controlled drones harvesting forests. Nature will and must endure, he proclaims: stability will be restored, with or without humans.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
超越“自然平衡”:牧民对可持续性的另类视角
大卫·爱登堡在纪录片《我们星球上的生命:我的见证声明》中恢复自然平衡的使命既鼓舞人心又令人担忧。如果自然的平衡不存在怎么办?如果这个任务错了怎么办?这部电影充满了自然纪录片中熟悉的比喻,再次以爱登堡熟悉的庄重手法重复。人类已经占领了世界。荒野已被摧毁。稳定与平衡——“全新世的安全与稳定”——遭到破坏。我们独特的世界——援引从太空看到的“只有一个地球”的标志性画面(Ward和Dubos 1972)——受到了威胁。灾难和危机迫在眉睫。当然,除非“我们”(一个相当普通的人类)能够通过保护生物多样性来恢复稳定;用他的话说,“重建世界”。我们这些在爱登堡令人惊叹的自然历史节目中长大的人已经习惯了以马尔萨斯叙事为中心的标准故事情节。太多的人类会破坏电影中描绘的令人敬畏的原始自然。然而,与他之前的大多数纪录片不同,这部纪录片更进一步。在震惊的达沃斯观众面前,一个小时的熟悉叙事以一些悲惨而离奇的海象死亡形象达到高潮。然后争论发生了变化。在这篇非常个人化的证词中,93岁的阿滕伯勒(Attenborough)认为,我们必须重新发现如何实现可持续发展:从“远离自然”转变为“成为自然的一部分”与自然合作,而不是与自然对抗。当然,在谨慎的语气中,我们提供了一个更具批判性的视角:一个将资本主义——尽管他在英国广播公司的一次采访中这样做了,但这里没有点名——以及政治和经济的结构性关系视为非人类世界毁灭背后的驱动力的视角。他认为,世界末日倒计时的必然性可能会受到挑战,即使最终会受到一些奇怪的技术乌托邦解决方案的挑战,比如遥控无人机砍伐森林。他宣称:无论有没有人类,自然都将而且必须持久:稳定将得到恢复。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Nomadic Peoples
Nomadic Peoples ANTHROPOLOGY-
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
11.10%
发文量
19
期刊介绍: Nomadic Peoples is an international journal published for the Commission on Nomadic Peoples, International Union of Anthropological and Ethnological Sciences. Its primary concerns are the current circumstances of all nomadic peoples around the world and their prospects. Its readership includes all those interested in nomadic peoples—scholars, researchers, planners and project administrators.
期刊最新文献
Echi Christina Gabbert, Fana Gebresenbet, John G. Galaty and Günther Schlee, Lands of the Future: Anthropological Perspectives on Pastoralism, Land Deals and Tropes of Modernity in Eastern Africa PASTORALIST MOBILITY ALONG THE SUDANESE ETHIOPIAN BORDERLAND: TOWARDS COOPERATIVE LAND MANAGEMENT GENDER-DIFFERENTIATED ROLES AND PERCEPTIONS ON CLIMATE VARIABILITY AMONG PASTORALIST AND AGRO-PASTORALIST COMMUNITIES IN MARSABIT, KENYA PASTORALISTS, CAMELS AND STATE-MAKING: THE BANU SAKHR AND GLUBB PASHA IN EARLY TWENTIETH-CENTURY JORDAN CAROLYN KORNFELD LESOROGOL (1965–2023) – IN MEMORIAM
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1