Retrospective Study of the Efficacy and Safety of Laser and Oral Combination Therapy for Non-responders to Neodymium-doped Yttrium Aluminum Garnet Laser: A Review of 20 Patients with Onychomycosis

Sang-Doo Lee, M. Shin
{"title":"Retrospective Study of the Efficacy and Safety of Laser\nand Oral Combination Therapy for Non-responders to\nNeodymium-doped Yttrium Aluminum Garnet Laser:\nA Review of 20 Patients with Onychomycosis","authors":"Sang-Doo Lee, M. Shin","doi":"10.17966/jmi.2023.28.1.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Oral antifungal drugs are the primary treatment for onychomycosis. However, there are few studies on the effectiveness and safety of oral combination therapy after laser treatment.\nObjective: We sought to contrast the efficacy and safety of laser and oral combination therapy with that of oral monotherapy for non-responders to laser treatment.\nMethods: We retrospectively evaluated the medical charts and photographs of 20 patients who received four sessions of Nd:YAG laser. Among these patients, 11 were \"laser non-responders\" and 9 were \"laser partial responders\". Afterward, 10 patients received oral drugs in addition to laser treatment (combination therapy) and the other 10 were completely altered to oral drugs, with no laser treatment (oral monotherapy). Clinical evaluation was conducted at baseline and 3 months after treatment. Recurrence was evaluated 3 months after the final evaluation.\nResults: Clinical evaluation revealed that combining or switching to oral antifungal drugs was substantially effective in the laser non-responder group (Z = -2.481, p = 0.013). Combination therapy was more effective than oral monotherapy (Z = -1.324, p = 0.247). Furthermore, positive baseline mycological results demonstrated a higher\npossibility of laser monotherapy failure (χ2 = -5.089, p = 0.024). There were two cases of recurrence in the oral monotherapy group and no adverse effect was discovered in any patient.\nConclusion: This study highlighted that the combination of oral drugs with laser therapy could be beneficial\nregarding efficacy, recurrence, and safety in the treatment of patients who are refractory to laser therapy.","PeriodicalId":36021,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Mycology and Infection","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Mycology and Infection","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17966/jmi.2023.28.1.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Oral antifungal drugs are the primary treatment for onychomycosis. However, there are few studies on the effectiveness and safety of oral combination therapy after laser treatment. Objective: We sought to contrast the efficacy and safety of laser and oral combination therapy with that of oral monotherapy for non-responders to laser treatment. Methods: We retrospectively evaluated the medical charts and photographs of 20 patients who received four sessions of Nd:YAG laser. Among these patients, 11 were "laser non-responders" and 9 were "laser partial responders". Afterward, 10 patients received oral drugs in addition to laser treatment (combination therapy) and the other 10 were completely altered to oral drugs, with no laser treatment (oral monotherapy). Clinical evaluation was conducted at baseline and 3 months after treatment. Recurrence was evaluated 3 months after the final evaluation. Results: Clinical evaluation revealed that combining or switching to oral antifungal drugs was substantially effective in the laser non-responder group (Z = -2.481, p = 0.013). Combination therapy was more effective than oral monotherapy (Z = -1.324, p = 0.247). Furthermore, positive baseline mycological results demonstrated a higher possibility of laser monotherapy failure (χ2 = -5.089, p = 0.024). There were two cases of recurrence in the oral monotherapy group and no adverse effect was discovered in any patient. Conclusion: This study highlighted that the combination of oral drugs with laser therapy could be beneficial regarding efficacy, recurrence, and safety in the treatment of patients who are refractory to laser therapy.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
激光与口服联合治疗无应答者的疗效和安全性回顾性研究掺钕钇铝石榴石激光:20例甲真菌病患者的回顾性分析
背景:口服抗真菌药物是治疗甲真菌病的主要方法。然而,关于激光治疗后口服联合治疗的有效性和安全性的研究很少。目的:比较激光与口服联合治疗与口服单药治疗对激光治疗无反应的疗效和安全性。方法:回顾性分析20例接受4次Nd:YAG激光治疗的患者的病历和照片。其中11例为激光无反应者,9例为激光部分反应者。随后,10例患者在激光治疗的基础上口服药物(联合治疗),另外10例完全改为口服药物,不进行激光治疗(口服单药治疗)。分别于治疗前和治疗后3个月进行临床评价。在最终评估后3个月评估复发情况。结果:临床评价显示,激光无反应组联合或改用口服抗真菌药物基本有效(Z = -2.481, p = 0.013)。联合治疗优于口服单药治疗(Z = -1.324, p = 0.247)。此外,阳性的基线真菌学结果表明激光单药治疗失败的可能性更高(χ2 = -5.089, p = 0.024)。口服单药治疗组复发2例,无不良反应发生。结论:本研究强调了口服药物与激光治疗联合治疗对激光治疗难治性患者在疗效、复发和安全性方面是有益的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Mycology and Infection
Journal of Mycology and Infection Medicine-Infectious Diseases
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
期刊介绍: The Journal of mycology and infection (Acronym: JMI, Abbreviation: J Mycol Infect) aims to publish articles of exceptional interests in the field of medical mycology. The journal originally was launched in 1996 as the Korean Journal of Medical Mycology and has reformed into the current state beginning on March of 2018. The contents of the journal should elucidate important microbiological fundamentals and provide qualitative insights to respective clinical aspects. JMI underlines the submission of novel findings and studies in clinical mycology that are enriched by analyses achieved through investigative methods. The journal should be of general interests to the scientific communities at large and should provide medical societies with advanced breadth and depth of mycological expertise. In addition, the journal supplements infectious diseases in adjunct to the field of mycology to address a well-rounded understanding of infectious disorders. The Journal of mycology and infection, which is issued quarterly, in March, June, September and December each year, published in English. The scope of the Journal of mycology and infection includes invited reviews, original articles, case reports, letter to the editor, and images in mycology. The journal is compliant to peer-review/open access and all articles undergo rigorous reviewing processes by our internationally acknowledged team of editorial boards. The articles directed to publication should encompass in-depth materials that employ scholastic values of mycology and various infectious diseases. Articles responding to critical methodology and outcomes which have potential to enhance better understanding of mycology and infectious diseases are also suitable for publication.
期刊最新文献
Therapeutic Use of Posaconazole for Cutaneous Purpureocillium lilacinum Infection Refractory to Itraconazole Differentiating Verruca Plana and Palmoplantar Keratoderma by Comparing Clinical Features Subcutaneous Basidiobolomycosis: A Rare and Underdiagnosed but Curable Fungal Infection - A Case Report A Case of Disseminated Coccidioidomycosis Confirmed by Skin Biopsy in Korea Overview of Malassezia Infection and Candidiasis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1