Dampened sensory representations for expected input across the ventral visual stream.

Oxford open neuroscience Pub Date : 2022-08-15 eCollection Date: 2022-01-01 DOI:10.1093/oons/kvac013
David Richter, Micha Heilbron, Floris P de Lange
{"title":"Dampened sensory representations for expected input across the ventral visual stream.","authors":"David Richter, Micha Heilbron, Floris P de Lange","doi":"10.1093/oons/kvac013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Expectations, derived from previous experience, can help in making perception faster, more reliable and informative. A key neural signature of perceptual expectations is expectation suppression, an attenuated neural response to expected compared with unexpected stimuli. While expectation suppression has been reported using a variety of paradigms and recording methods, it remains unclear what neural modulation underlies this response attenuation. Sharpening models propose that neural populations tuned away from an expected stimulus are particularly suppressed by expectations, thereby resulting in an attenuated, but sharper population response. In contrast, dampening models suggest that neural populations tuned toward the expected stimulus are most suppressed, thus resulting in a dampened, less redundant population response. Empirical support is divided, with some studies favoring sharpening, while others support dampening. A key limitation of previous neuroimaging studies is the ability to draw inferences about neural-level modulations based on population (e.g. voxel) level signals. Indeed, recent simulations of repetition suppression showed that opposite neural modulations can lead to comparable population-level modulations. Forward models provide one solution to this inference limitation. Here, we used forward models to implement sharpening and dampening models, mapping neural modulations to voxel-level data. We show that a feature-specific gain modulation, suppressing neurons tuned toward the expected stimulus, best explains the empirical fMRI data. Thus, our results support the dampening account of expectation suppression, suggesting that expectations reduce redundancy in sensory cortex, and thereby promote updating of internal models on the basis of surprising information.</p>","PeriodicalId":74386,"journal":{"name":"Oxford open neuroscience","volume":" ","pages":"kvac013"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10939312/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oxford open neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oons/kvac013","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Expectations, derived from previous experience, can help in making perception faster, more reliable and informative. A key neural signature of perceptual expectations is expectation suppression, an attenuated neural response to expected compared with unexpected stimuli. While expectation suppression has been reported using a variety of paradigms and recording methods, it remains unclear what neural modulation underlies this response attenuation. Sharpening models propose that neural populations tuned away from an expected stimulus are particularly suppressed by expectations, thereby resulting in an attenuated, but sharper population response. In contrast, dampening models suggest that neural populations tuned toward the expected stimulus are most suppressed, thus resulting in a dampened, less redundant population response. Empirical support is divided, with some studies favoring sharpening, while others support dampening. A key limitation of previous neuroimaging studies is the ability to draw inferences about neural-level modulations based on population (e.g. voxel) level signals. Indeed, recent simulations of repetition suppression showed that opposite neural modulations can lead to comparable population-level modulations. Forward models provide one solution to this inference limitation. Here, we used forward models to implement sharpening and dampening models, mapping neural modulations to voxel-level data. We show that a feature-specific gain modulation, suppressing neurons tuned toward the expected stimulus, best explains the empirical fMRI data. Thus, our results support the dampening account of expectation suppression, suggesting that expectations reduce redundancy in sensory cortex, and thereby promote updating of internal models on the basis of surprising information.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
腹侧视觉流中预期输入的阻尼感觉表示
从以前的经验中产生的期望可以帮助我们更快、更可靠、更有见地。感知期望的一个关键神经特征是期望抑制,即与意外刺激相比,预期刺激的神经反应减弱。虽然期望抑制已被报道使用各种范式和记录方法,但仍不清楚是什么神经调节导致了这种反应衰减。锐化模型提出,远离预期刺激的神经群特别受到预期的抑制,从而导致一种减弱的,但更尖锐的群体反应。相反,抑制模型表明,对预期刺激进行调整的神经群体受到最大程度的抑制,从而导致一个抑制的、不那么冗余的群体反应。实证支持有分歧,一些研究支持锐化,而另一些研究支持阻尼。先前神经影像学研究的一个关键限制是基于群体(如体素)水平信号推断神经水平调节的能力。事实上,最近对重复抑制的模拟表明,相反的神经调节可以导致类似的群体水平的调节。前向模型为这种推理限制提供了一种解决方案。在这里,我们使用前向模型来实现锐化和衰减模型,将神经调节映射到体素级数据。我们发现,一个特征特异性增益调制,抑制神经元对预期刺激的调谐,最好地解释了经验fMRI数据。因此,我们的研究结果支持期望抑制的抑制解释,表明期望减少了感觉皮层的冗余,从而促进了基于意外信息的内部模型的更新。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Machine learning-based prediction of one-year mortality in ischemic stroke patients. Astrocytic GPCR signaling in the anterior cingulate cortex modulates decision making in rats. Modulation of marble-burying behavior in adult versus adolescent C57BL/6J mice of both sexes by ethologically relevant chemosensory stimuli Correction to: Retina regeneration: lessons from vertebrates Altered neuroepithelial morphogenesis and migration defects in iPSC-derived cerebral organoids and 2D neural stem cells in familial bipolar disorder
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1