‘Measured by two yardsticks’: women in bank management training, 1960s to 1990s

IF 0.8 4区 管理学 Q1 HISTORY Management & Organizational History Pub Date : 2020-04-02 DOI:10.1080/17449359.2020.1758146
A. Elias
{"title":"‘Measured by two yardsticks’: women in bank management training, 1960s to 1990s","authors":"A. Elias","doi":"10.1080/17449359.2020.1758146","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT In the 1960s and 1970s, the United States government ordered corporations to remedy sex discrimination by increasing the number of women working in male-dominated job categories. This article traces the grassroots activism and government policies that led to the creation of management training programs for women in the commercial banking industry. To move women into the managerial job of a bank officer, conflicting advice emerged about how to best design and deliver training programs that could reconcile the real and imagined incongruities between women’s traditional social roles and the masculine character of managerial job positions. This article uses prescriptive literature, government documents, social science research, and mainstream media articles to show the ideological tension that arose as women began moving into the ranks of commercial banking management. Which women should be selected for training? What should be the content and structure of the programs? While many academics and practitioners considered the benefits of having separate training for women, others questioned if female managers should continue to be trained separately from male managers. The integration of women into commercial banking management likely sparked a broader discussion about the ideal qualities of managers. Female traits and tendencies could enhance the management function, helping to reconcile the traditional role incongruity between woman and manager.","PeriodicalId":45724,"journal":{"name":"Management & Organizational History","volume":"15 1","pages":"132 - 153"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2020-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/17449359.2020.1758146","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Management & Organizational History","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17449359.2020.1758146","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

ABSTRACT In the 1960s and 1970s, the United States government ordered corporations to remedy sex discrimination by increasing the number of women working in male-dominated job categories. This article traces the grassroots activism and government policies that led to the creation of management training programs for women in the commercial banking industry. To move women into the managerial job of a bank officer, conflicting advice emerged about how to best design and deliver training programs that could reconcile the real and imagined incongruities between women’s traditional social roles and the masculine character of managerial job positions. This article uses prescriptive literature, government documents, social science research, and mainstream media articles to show the ideological tension that arose as women began moving into the ranks of commercial banking management. Which women should be selected for training? What should be the content and structure of the programs? While many academics and practitioners considered the benefits of having separate training for women, others questioned if female managers should continue to be trained separately from male managers. The integration of women into commercial banking management likely sparked a broader discussion about the ideal qualities of managers. Female traits and tendencies could enhance the management function, helping to reconcile the traditional role incongruity between woman and manager.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“用两个标准衡量”:20世纪60年代至90年代接受银行管理培训的女性
上世纪六七十年代,美国政府要求企业通过增加女性在男性占主导地位的岗位上工作来消除性别歧视。本文追溯了导致商业银行业女性管理培训项目创建的基层行动主义和政府政策。为了让女性进入银行高管的管理岗位,关于如何最好地设计和提供培训项目,以调和女性传统社会角色与管理职位的男性特征之间真实和想象的不协调,出现了相互矛盾的建议。本文使用规范性文献、政府文件、社会科学研究和主流媒体文章来展示随着女性开始进入商业银行管理阶层而产生的意识形态紧张。应该选择哪些女性参加培训?节目的内容和结构应该是什么?虽然许多学者和从业人员认为对妇女进行单独培训的好处,但其他人质疑是否应该继续将女性管理人员与男性管理人员分开培训。将女性纳入商业银行管理可能引发了关于管理者理想品质的更广泛讨论。女性特质和倾向可以增强管理功能,有助于调和女性与管理者之间的传统角色不协调。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
16.70%
发文量
8
期刊介绍: Management & Organizational History (M&OH) is a quarterly, peer-reviewed journal that aims to publish high quality, original, academic research concerning historical approaches to the study of management, organizations and organizing. The journal addresses issues from all areas of management, organization studies, and related fields. The unifying theme of M&OH is its historical orientation. The journal is both empirical and theoretical. It seeks to advance innovative historical methods. It facilitates interdisciplinary dialogue, especially between business and management history and organization theory. The ethos of M&OH is reflective, ethical, imaginative, critical, inter-disciplinary, and international, as well as historical in orientation.
期刊最新文献
The history of entrepreneurship education in the United Kingdom: 1860-2020 Family entrepreneurs and their next generations, 1809–1945: educational pathways of business elite in Finland Who watches the watchdogs? Central bank board members and banking supervisors in Switzerland (1907–2008) Informing the ontologies of organizational histories: the critical conceptualization of events and actualization in organizing Who determined the rules of the game in the Spanish financial reforms, 1970-1990?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1