Acceptance and Dropout Rates of Individuals with Asthma Approached in Self-management Interventions: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

IF 0.6 Q4 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES Journal of Health Management Pub Date : 2023-03-05 DOI:10.1177/09720634221150970
O. Eilayyan, A. Arafah
{"title":"Acceptance and Dropout Rates of Individuals with Asthma Approached in Self-management Interventions: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis","authors":"O. Eilayyan, A. Arafah","doi":"10.1177/09720634221150970","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The objectives of this systematic review were to assess the acceptability of self-management interventions for people with asthma and identify contributing factors. A systematic literature search was conducted using PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE (OVIDWEB), CINAHL and Cochrane databases. Clinical trials design was included if they met specified criteria. A random-effect meta-regression analysis was conducted to estimate the overall acceptance and drop-out rates and to assess the potential factors that may influence the outcomes. A total of 64 studies were included and 8,092 participants were recruited and participated in the trials. The estimated acceptance rate was 51.1%, while the estimated drop-out rates in the intervention and control groups were 18.2% and 15.6%, respectively. Lack of interest was the main reported reason for refusing to participate and dropping out from the program. Study-related and program-related factors influenced the acceptance and drop-out rates statistically and clinically. The acceptance rate of self-management programs among asthmatic people was not high and the dropout rate was somewhat low. The review suggests optimizing the design of self-management studies and modifying the implemented self-management programs to increase the acceptance rate and decrease the dropout rate.","PeriodicalId":45421,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Health Management","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Health Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/09720634221150970","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The objectives of this systematic review were to assess the acceptability of self-management interventions for people with asthma and identify contributing factors. A systematic literature search was conducted using PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE (OVIDWEB), CINAHL and Cochrane databases. Clinical trials design was included if they met specified criteria. A random-effect meta-regression analysis was conducted to estimate the overall acceptance and drop-out rates and to assess the potential factors that may influence the outcomes. A total of 64 studies were included and 8,092 participants were recruited and participated in the trials. The estimated acceptance rate was 51.1%, while the estimated drop-out rates in the intervention and control groups were 18.2% and 15.6%, respectively. Lack of interest was the main reported reason for refusing to participate and dropping out from the program. Study-related and program-related factors influenced the acceptance and drop-out rates statistically and clinically. The acceptance rate of self-management programs among asthmatic people was not high and the dropout rate was somewhat low. The review suggests optimizing the design of self-management studies and modifying the implemented self-management programs to increase the acceptance rate and decrease the dropout rate.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
哮喘个体自我管理干预的接受率和退出率:系统综述和荟萃分析
这项系统综述的目的是评估哮喘患者自我管理干预的可接受性,并确定促成因素。使用PubMed、MEDLINE、EMBASE(OVIDWEB)、CINAHL和Cochrane数据库进行系统的文献检索。如果符合特定标准,则纳入临床试验设计。进行了随机效应元回归分析,以估计总体接受率和辍学率,并评估可能影响结果的潜在因素。共纳入64项研究,招募了8092名参与者参与试验。预计接受率为51.1%,而干预组和对照组的预计退出率分别为18.2%和15.6%。据报道,缺乏兴趣是拒绝参加和退出该项目的主要原因。研究相关和项目相关因素在统计学和临床上影响接受率和辍学率。哮喘患者对自我管理项目的接受率不高,辍学率略低。该综述建议优化自我管理研究的设计,修改已实施的自我管理计划,以提高接受率和降低辍学率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Health Management
Journal of Health Management HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
84
期刊最新文献
Networks of HIV Service Organisations: Changes Over Time and Implications for HIV Elimination. Identifying and Analysing Iran Medical Tourism Development Barriers Using Fuzzy Cognitive Mapping Innovative Approaches in the Management of Healthcare Organisations Health Insurance Business in India: Progress, Issues and Way Forward Modelling of the Explanatory Factors of the Number of COVID-19 Deaths for a Panel of Countries
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1