Soft OR as a response to inherent vices: Problem structuring to offset policy volatility

IF 2.3 Q3 MANAGEMENT EURO Journal on Decision Processes Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.1016/j.ejdp.2022.100019
Ching Leong , Michael Howlett
{"title":"Soft OR as a response to inherent vices: Problem structuring to offset policy volatility","authors":"Ching Leong ,&nbsp;Michael Howlett","doi":"10.1016/j.ejdp.2022.100019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Most policies suffer from what we call the “inherent vices” of policy design – attributes which increase policy volatility and risks of failure. These risks of uncertainty, maliciousness and non-compliance often emerge from the human or behavioural aspects of policy processes, such as when target populations fail to comply with rules designed to achieve a specific public value, or when policy-makers fail to design policies that achieve such values in the first place. Soft OR, developed on the assumption that problems are perceived by stakeholders through different lenses based on their social, cultural and psychological constructs, presents useful policy tools for assessing and dealing with these risks. We critically assess the use of Soft OR methods as tools for improving public policy-making.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":44104,"journal":{"name":"EURO Journal on Decision Processes","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2193943822000085/pdfft?md5=47a8a444e591bf452e8cf56bf24cd9b4&pid=1-s2.0-S2193943822000085-main.pdf","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EURO Journal on Decision Processes","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2193943822000085","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Most policies suffer from what we call the “inherent vices” of policy design – attributes which increase policy volatility and risks of failure. These risks of uncertainty, maliciousness and non-compliance often emerge from the human or behavioural aspects of policy processes, such as when target populations fail to comply with rules designed to achieve a specific public value, or when policy-makers fail to design policies that achieve such values in the first place. Soft OR, developed on the assumption that problems are perceived by stakeholders through different lenses based on their social, cultural and psychological constructs, presents useful policy tools for assessing and dealing with these risks. We critically assess the use of Soft OR methods as tools for improving public policy-making.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
软OR作为对固有弊端的回应:问题结构以抵消政策波动性
大多数政策都受到我们所谓的政策设计“固有缺陷”的影响——这些属性增加了政策的波动性和失败的风险。这些不确定性、恶意和不合规的风险往往来自政策过程的人或行为方面,例如当目标人群未能遵守旨在实现特定公共价值的规则时,或者当政策制定者未能首先设计实现这些价值的政策时。软风险评估是基于利益相关者基于其社会、文化和心理结构通过不同的视角看待问题的假设而发展起来的,它为评估和处理这些风险提供了有用的政策工具。我们批判性地评估软OR方法作为改进公共决策工具的使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
10.00%
发文量
15
期刊最新文献
Editorial: Feature Issue on Fair and Explainable Decision Support Systems Editorial: Feature issue on fair and explainable decision support systems Corrigendum to “Multi-objective optimization in real-time operation of rainwater harvesting systems” [EURO Journal on Decision Processes Volume 11 (2023) 100039] Multiobjective combinatorial optimization with interactive evolutionary algorithms: The case of facility location problems Performance assessment of waste sorting: Component-based approach to incorporate quality into data envelopment analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1