{"title":"The Shangluo Corridor and the emerging Bronze Age exchange network of early China","authors":"Tao SHI","doi":"10.1016/j.ara.2023.100439","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The Longshan-Erlitou periods (ca. 2300–1520 BCE) witnessed a reconfiguration of China's political-economic landscape. With the collapse of Neolithic societies in the many regions of China, the emergence of Erlitou (ca. 1800–1520 BCE) marked the advent of the Chinese Bronze Age. During the process of repeated political collapse and regeneration, the Luoyang Basin became the center of the political-economic landscape during the Erlitou period and inherited the knowledge systems transmitted in the Longshan interaction network. The Shangluo Corridor provides a good lens to look at this process. Based on the landscape, historical geography and GIS simulation, the Shangluo corridor served as one of the most important gateways connecting the communities located in the highland regions and the Middle Yangzi River valley. Based on archaeological information from communities along the Shangluo Corridor, I discuss the structure of cultural interactions along the Shangluo Corridor during the Longshan and Erlitou periods. By integrating these analyses, I suggest that the formation of exchange networks along the Shangluo Corridor resulted from the participation of multiple cultural groups during the Longshan period. With the regeneration of Erlitou in the Luoyang Basin and its participation in the interaction network, diverse types of knowledge converged into the Luoyang Basin, laying the foundation for the formation of a Central Plains-centered political-economic landscape.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51847,"journal":{"name":"Archaeological Research in Asia","volume":"34 ","pages":"Article 100439"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archaeological Research in Asia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352226723000119","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ARCHAEOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The Longshan-Erlitou periods (ca. 2300–1520 BCE) witnessed a reconfiguration of China's political-economic landscape. With the collapse of Neolithic societies in the many regions of China, the emergence of Erlitou (ca. 1800–1520 BCE) marked the advent of the Chinese Bronze Age. During the process of repeated political collapse and regeneration, the Luoyang Basin became the center of the political-economic landscape during the Erlitou period and inherited the knowledge systems transmitted in the Longshan interaction network. The Shangluo Corridor provides a good lens to look at this process. Based on the landscape, historical geography and GIS simulation, the Shangluo corridor served as one of the most important gateways connecting the communities located in the highland regions and the Middle Yangzi River valley. Based on archaeological information from communities along the Shangluo Corridor, I discuss the structure of cultural interactions along the Shangluo Corridor during the Longshan and Erlitou periods. By integrating these analyses, I suggest that the formation of exchange networks along the Shangluo Corridor resulted from the participation of multiple cultural groups during the Longshan period. With the regeneration of Erlitou in the Luoyang Basin and its participation in the interaction network, diverse types of knowledge converged into the Luoyang Basin, laying the foundation for the formation of a Central Plains-centered political-economic landscape.
期刊介绍:
Archaeological Research in Asia presents high quality scholarly research conducted in between the Bosporus and the Pacific on a broad range of archaeological subjects of importance to audiences across Asia and around the world. The journal covers the traditional components of archaeology: placing events and patterns in time and space; analysis of past lifeways; and explanations for cultural processes and change. To this end, the publication will highlight theoretical and methodological advances in studying the past, present new data, and detail patterns that reshape our understanding of it. Archaeological Research in Asia publishes work on the full temporal range of archaeological inquiry from the earliest human presence in Asia with a special emphasis on time periods under-represented in other venues. Journal contributions are of three kinds: articles, case reports and short communications. Full length articles should present synthetic treatments, novel analyses, or theoretical approaches to unresolved issues. Case reports present basic data on subjects that are of broad interest because they represent key sites, sequences, and subjects that figure prominently, or should figure prominently, in how scholars both inside and outside Asia understand the archaeology of cultural and biological change through time. Short communications present new findings (e.g., radiocarbon dates) that are important to the extent that they reaffirm or change the way scholars in Asia and around the world think about Asian cultural or biological history.