Post-War Korean Conservatism, Japanese Statism, and the Legacy of President Park Chung-hee in South Korea

IF 0.1 Q4 INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS Korean Journal of International Studies Pub Date : 2018-04-30 DOI:10.14731/kjis.2018.04.16.1.57
Minji Jeong, Youseop Shin
{"title":"Post-War Korean Conservatism, Japanese Statism, and the Legacy of President Park Chung-hee in South Korea","authors":"Minji Jeong, Youseop Shin","doi":"10.14731/kjis.2018.04.16.1.57","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"During this period, his ideas were deeply engraved in Korean society. Even in the present day, his conservative ideas are a source of continuing controver-sy. To understand conservative ideas and ideological disputes between conservatism and progressivism in Korea, it is important to objectively understand Park’s ideas. To this end, we analyze his ideas in relation to Japanese statism. We do not intend to resolve the long-standing controversies over whether Park was pro-Japan during the colonial period or whether his ideas and policies benefited Korea. Nor do we intend to evaluate his ideas in a wholly negative light by arguing that they were influenced by Japanese statism. Various legitimate stances can be taken toward statism, in general, and Park’s ideas, in particular, and it is not our purpose to evaluate these stances. In this article, we show that there is a resemblance between conservative characteristics of Japanese statism—a mixture of militarism, elitism, and physiocracy—and Park’s ideas and his policies. More than sixty percent of Koreans are farmers. Rural areas can become a huge market that will contribute to industrial development. Thus, we cannot overemphasize the importance of increasing rural house-hold income (Park 2005, 470-471).","PeriodicalId":41543,"journal":{"name":"Korean Journal of International Studies","volume":"16 1","pages":"57-76"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2018-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Korean Journal of International Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14731/kjis.2018.04.16.1.57","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

During this period, his ideas were deeply engraved in Korean society. Even in the present day, his conservative ideas are a source of continuing controver-sy. To understand conservative ideas and ideological disputes between conservatism and progressivism in Korea, it is important to objectively understand Park’s ideas. To this end, we analyze his ideas in relation to Japanese statism. We do not intend to resolve the long-standing controversies over whether Park was pro-Japan during the colonial period or whether his ideas and policies benefited Korea. Nor do we intend to evaluate his ideas in a wholly negative light by arguing that they were influenced by Japanese statism. Various legitimate stances can be taken toward statism, in general, and Park’s ideas, in particular, and it is not our purpose to evaluate these stances. In this article, we show that there is a resemblance between conservative characteristics of Japanese statism—a mixture of militarism, elitism, and physiocracy—and Park’s ideas and his policies. More than sixty percent of Koreans are farmers. Rural areas can become a huge market that will contribute to industrial development. Thus, we cannot overemphasize the importance of increasing rural house-hold income (Park 2005, 470-471).
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
战后韩国保守主义、日本中央集权主义与朴正熙总统在韩国的政治遗产
在这一时期,他的思想深深地刻在了韩国社会。即使在今天,他的保守思想仍是持续争议的来源。要理解韩国的保守思想和保守与进步的思想之争,就必须客观地理解朴槿惠的思想。为此,我们分析了他的思想与日本国家主义的关系。他说:“我们并不是要解决在殖民时期是否亲日、朴总统的主张和政策是否对韩国有利等问题。”我们也不打算以完全负面的观点来评价他的观点,认为它们受到了日本国家主义的影响。一般来说,对于国家主义,特别是朴槿惠的思想,可以采取各种合理的立场,我们的目的不是评价这些立场。在这篇文章中,我们展示了日本国家主义的保守特征——军国主义、精英主义和重农主义的混合体——与朴槿惠的思想和政策之间的相似之处。60%以上的韩国人是农民。农村地区可以成为促进工业发展的巨大市场。因此,我们不能过分强调增加农村家庭收入的重要性(Park 2005,470 -471)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Korean Journal of International Studies
Korean Journal of International Studies INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS-
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
期刊最新文献
CRUDE POWER: How Oil Affects Military Capacity and Institutions The Moderating Effects of Official Development Assistance on the Relationship between Foreign Direct Investment and Human Development The Nord Stream pipe dream: How an outdated Ostpolitik misguided Germany’s foreign policy toward Russia Why Restrict Emigration: Autocrats’ Economic Ideas in Uzbekistan and Tajikistan Supply Chain Security in the Age of Techno-Geopolitics: ‘Fab 4’ Case in the Semiconductor Industry
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1