Exploring Agreement Between Adolescent Self-Reported PTSD Symptoms and Clinical Diagnoses on a Psychiatric Inpatient Unit

C. White, A. Ugueto
{"title":"Exploring Agreement Between Adolescent Self-Reported PTSD Symptoms and Clinical Diagnoses on a Psychiatric Inpatient Unit","authors":"C. White, A. Ugueto","doi":"10.1080/23794925.2022.2127133","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT A significant number of adolescents in the U.S. experience traumatic events, putting them at risk for developing Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD). Despite this risk, PTSD is not a commonly assigned diagnosis in psychiatric settings. The current study examined rates of psychiatrist-reported PTSD (PR-PTSD) diagnoses compared to probable PTSD diagnoses based on adolescent self-reported PTSD (SR-PTSD) symptoms on a psychiatric inpatient unit (n = 151, age 13–17). Self-report measures included questions on exposure to trauma and The Child PTSD Symptom Scale for DSM-5 (CPSS-5). Approximately 60% of participants met criteria for a “probable PTSD diagnosis” on the CPSS-5; however, only 10 out of 151 (6.6%) and 58 out of 151 (38.4%) were given PR-PTSD at admission and at discharge, respectively. Chi-square analyses indicated adolescents with SR-PTSD were more likely to have previous psychiatric admissions, χ2(1, N = 149) = 3.87, p = .049. There was also a significant association between SR-PTSD and suicide risk, χ2(3, N = 148) = 9.93, p = .019. Both the null and low suicide risk groups contributed the most to predicting SR-PTSD based on the standardized residuals being ±1.96. Additionally, SR-PTSD and insurance status were significantly associated, χ2(1, N = 147) = 4.48, p = .034. All of the cells equally contributed to the significance. When comparing diagnosis given at admission to SR-PTSD, agreement was poor (κ=.070, p = .043), and there was no agreement between diagnosis given at discharge and SR-PTSD (κ=.116, p = .074). Findings from the study highlight a discrepancy in SR-PTSD and PR-PTSD in adolescent psychiatric settings.","PeriodicalId":72992,"journal":{"name":"Evidence-based practice in child and adolescent mental health","volume":"7 1","pages":"463 - 476"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Evidence-based practice in child and adolescent mental health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23794925.2022.2127133","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

ABSTRACT A significant number of adolescents in the U.S. experience traumatic events, putting them at risk for developing Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD). Despite this risk, PTSD is not a commonly assigned diagnosis in psychiatric settings. The current study examined rates of psychiatrist-reported PTSD (PR-PTSD) diagnoses compared to probable PTSD diagnoses based on adolescent self-reported PTSD (SR-PTSD) symptoms on a psychiatric inpatient unit (n = 151, age 13–17). Self-report measures included questions on exposure to trauma and The Child PTSD Symptom Scale for DSM-5 (CPSS-5). Approximately 60% of participants met criteria for a “probable PTSD diagnosis” on the CPSS-5; however, only 10 out of 151 (6.6%) and 58 out of 151 (38.4%) were given PR-PTSD at admission and at discharge, respectively. Chi-square analyses indicated adolescents with SR-PTSD were more likely to have previous psychiatric admissions, χ2(1, N = 149) = 3.87, p = .049. There was also a significant association between SR-PTSD and suicide risk, χ2(3, N = 148) = 9.93, p = .019. Both the null and low suicide risk groups contributed the most to predicting SR-PTSD based on the standardized residuals being ±1.96. Additionally, SR-PTSD and insurance status were significantly associated, χ2(1, N = 147) = 4.48, p = .034. All of the cells equally contributed to the significance. When comparing diagnosis given at admission to SR-PTSD, agreement was poor (κ=.070, p = .043), and there was no agreement between diagnosis given at discharge and SR-PTSD (κ=.116, p = .074). Findings from the study highlight a discrepancy in SR-PTSD and PR-PTSD in adolescent psychiatric settings.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
探讨青少年自我报告的PTSD症状与精神科住院病人临床诊断的一致性
摘要:在美国,有相当多的青少年经历过创伤事件,这使他们面临患创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)的风险。尽管有这种风险,创伤后应激障碍并不是精神疾病中常见的诊断。目前的研究检查了精神科医生报告的PTSD(PR-PTSD)诊断率,与基于精神科住院病房青少年自我报告的创伤后应激障碍(SR-PTSD = 151岁,13-17岁)。自我报告测量包括创伤暴露问题和DSM-5儿童创伤后应激障碍症状量表(CPSS-5)。大约60%的参与者符合CPSS-5“可能的PTSD诊断”标准;然而,151人中只有10人(6.6%)和151人中有58人(38.4%)在入院和出院时分别服用了PR-PTSD。卡方分析表明,患有SR-PTSD的青少年更有可能有精神病史,χ2(1,N = 149) = 3.87,p = .SR-PTSD与自杀风险之间也存在显著相关性,χ2(3,N = 148) = 9.93,p = .根据标准化残差为±1.96,零自杀风险组和低自杀风险组对预测SR-PTSD的贡献最大。此外,SR-PTSD与保险状态显著相关,χ2(1,N = 147) = 4.48,p = .034.所有细胞对显著性的贡献相同。当比较SR-PTSD入院时的诊断时,一致性较差(κ=0.070,p = .043),出院时的诊断与SR-PTSD之间没有一致性(κ=.116,p = .074)。研究结果强调了青少年精神病环境中SR-PTSD和PR-PTSD的差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Anxiety and Depression Symptoms Improve in Partial Hospitalization Treatment for Adolescents with and without Suicidal Thoughts and Behaviors: Leveraging Measurement-Based Care and Electronic Health Record Data Collaborative Safety Planning with Youth during a Suicide-Related Emergency: Developmental and Family Considerations Outside the Clinic Door: How Neighborhood Sociodemographic Disadvantage is Associated with Community Therapist Secondary Traumatic Stress and Emotional Exhaustion Outside the Clinic Door: How Neighborhood Sociodemographic Disadvantage is Associated with Community Therapist Secondary Traumatic Stress and Emotional Exhaustion Open Trial of a Telehealth Adaptation of Team-Based Delivery of Cognitive Behavioral Treatment for Pediatric Anxiety and Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1