Scientific and Methodological Approaches to the Assessment of National Research Universities

Pub Date : 2022-01-17 DOI:10.46300/9109.2022.16.6
S. Pronichkin, I. Mamai, B. Savelyev, Zafar K. Vazirov
{"title":"Scientific and Methodological Approaches to the Assessment of National Research Universities","authors":"S. Pronichkin, I. Mamai, B. Savelyev, Zafar K. Vazirov","doi":"10.46300/9109.2022.16.6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The strategy of innovative development of Russia requires the formation of national research universities of the international level. Twenty-nine Russian universities have already been awarded this status. They are faced with a difficult task - to become the movers of priority areas for the development of science, technology, economic sectors, and the social sphere. The paper discusses the issue of assessing the quality of the activities of universities in the category \"National Research University\" (NRU). The disadvantages of existing approaches to assessing the activities of universities are highlighted. It is proposed to use self-assessment with the involvement of independent experts as a tool for assessing the activities of the NRU and its improvement. A process model and criteria for assessing the quality of the activities of a national research university have been developed. A mathematical model of the preferences of a decision-maker (DM) for a comprehensive assessment of the quality of NRU activities has been built. The model takes into account the individual and rational preferences of decision makers, as well as the balance of approaches and results to ensure the quality of NRU activities. Estimates of the numerical values of the parameters of the developed mathematical model are determined. For this, an experiment was planned and a D-optimal supersaturated design was built. The quality indicators of the developed model are calculated, which allow us to conclude that the developed model better describes the results of the experiment than the existing models.","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-01-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46300/9109.2022.16.6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The strategy of innovative development of Russia requires the formation of national research universities of the international level. Twenty-nine Russian universities have already been awarded this status. They are faced with a difficult task - to become the movers of priority areas for the development of science, technology, economic sectors, and the social sphere. The paper discusses the issue of assessing the quality of the activities of universities in the category "National Research University" (NRU). The disadvantages of existing approaches to assessing the activities of universities are highlighted. It is proposed to use self-assessment with the involvement of independent experts as a tool for assessing the activities of the NRU and its improvement. A process model and criteria for assessing the quality of the activities of a national research university have been developed. A mathematical model of the preferences of a decision-maker (DM) for a comprehensive assessment of the quality of NRU activities has been built. The model takes into account the individual and rational preferences of decision makers, as well as the balance of approaches and results to ensure the quality of NRU activities. Estimates of the numerical values of the parameters of the developed mathematical model are determined. For this, an experiment was planned and a D-optimal supersaturated design was built. The quality indicators of the developed model are calculated, which allow us to conclude that the developed model better describes the results of the experiment than the existing models.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
国立研究型大学评估的科学方法论方法
俄罗斯的创新发展战略要求形成具有国际水平的国立研究型大学。29所俄罗斯大学已经被授予这一地位。他们面临着一项艰巨的任务——成为科学、技术、经济部门和社会领域优先发展领域的推动者。本文讨论了“国立研究型大学”(NRU)类大学活动质量的评估问题。强调了评估大学活动的现有方法的缺点。建议将有独立专家参与的自我评估作为评估NRU活动及其改进情况的工具。已经制定了一个评估国立研究型大学活动质量的过程模型和标准。建立了决策者偏好的数学模型,用于NRU活动质量的综合评估。该模型考虑了决策者的个人和理性偏好,以及方法和结果的平衡,以确保NRU活动的质量。确定了所开发的数学模型的参数的数值估计。为此,计划了一个实验,并建立了D最优过饱和设计。计算了所开发的模型的质量指标,这使我们能够得出结论,所开发的模式比现有的模式更好地描述了实验结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1