Crowd Coaxing and Citizen Storytelling in Archives of Crisis

IF 0.3 3区 文学 0 LITERATURE Life Writing Pub Date : 2022-08-09 DOI:10.1080/14484528.2022.2106611
Kerri Davies
{"title":"Crowd Coaxing and Citizen Storytelling in Archives of Crisis","authors":"Kerri Davies","doi":"10.1080/14484528.2022.2106611","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Cultural institutions are continually responding and adapting to the pandemic and climate change, from operational challenges in times of lockdown and natural disasters, to rapid response collecting practices that document these ‘unprecedented times’. As part of their response, some of these institutions—known as LAM (Libraries and Museums)— have harnessed participatory media such as Facebook and purpose-built digital sites that simultaneously collect, curate and often exhibit life narratives in public archives of crises. This practice can be described reductively as crowdsourcing; however, I conceptualise curators’ rapid response collecting efforts of Covid-19 and climate change life narratives on participatory media platforms as crowd coaxing, and those who respond to the crowd coax are citizen storytellers, who co-publish archives of crisis with the institution. Whilst this is not without ethical and structural challenges, the National Museum of Australia’s participatory website, ‘Momentous’ and associated Facebook public group pages: ‘Bridging the Distance: Sharing our Covid-19 pandemic experiences’ and ‘Fridge Door Fire Stories’ show how such crowd coaxing practices create archives of crisis populated by citizen storytellers who exert agency within the traditional power dynamics of institutional frameworks and national identity for a more diverse historical record.","PeriodicalId":43797,"journal":{"name":"Life Writing","volume":"20 1","pages":"351 - 365"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Life Writing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14484528.2022.2106611","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT Cultural institutions are continually responding and adapting to the pandemic and climate change, from operational challenges in times of lockdown and natural disasters, to rapid response collecting practices that document these ‘unprecedented times’. As part of their response, some of these institutions—known as LAM (Libraries and Museums)— have harnessed participatory media such as Facebook and purpose-built digital sites that simultaneously collect, curate and often exhibit life narratives in public archives of crises. This practice can be described reductively as crowdsourcing; however, I conceptualise curators’ rapid response collecting efforts of Covid-19 and climate change life narratives on participatory media platforms as crowd coaxing, and those who respond to the crowd coax are citizen storytellers, who co-publish archives of crisis with the institution. Whilst this is not without ethical and structural challenges, the National Museum of Australia’s participatory website, ‘Momentous’ and associated Facebook public group pages: ‘Bridging the Distance: Sharing our Covid-19 pandemic experiences’ and ‘Fridge Door Fire Stories’ show how such crowd coaxing practices create archives of crisis populated by citizen storytellers who exert agency within the traditional power dynamics of institutional frameworks and national identity for a more diverse historical record.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
危机档案中的群众咨询与市民故事
文化机构正在不断地应对和适应流行病和气候变化,从封锁和自然灾害时期的运营挑战,到记录这些“前所未有的时代”的快速反应收集实践。作为应对措施的一部分,其中一些机构——被称为LAM(图书馆和博物馆)——利用Facebook等参与性媒体和专门建立的数字网站,同时收集、策划并经常展示危机公共档案中的生活叙事。这种做法可以简化为众包;然而,我将策展人在参与式媒体平台上对Covid-19和气候变化生活叙事的快速反应收集工作定义为人群哄骗,而那些对人群哄骗做出回应的人是公民故事讲述者,他们与机构共同发布危机档案。虽然这并非没有道德和结构上的挑战,但澳大利亚国家博物馆的参与性网站“重大”和相关的Facebook公共群组页面:“弥合距离:“分享我们的Covid-19大流行经验”和“冰箱门火灾故事”展示了这种哄骗人群的做法如何创造出由公民讲故事者填充的危机档案,他们在制度框架和国家认同的传统权力动态中发挥作用,以实现更多样化的历史记录。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Life Writing
Life Writing LITERATURE-
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
25.00%
发文量
38
期刊最新文献
Rearranged: An Opera Singer’s Facial Cancer and Life Transposed Knausgård and the Autofictional Novel The Song of the Whole Wide World: On Grief, Motherhood and Poetry Witnessing Con/Text(s) and Narrativizing Subjectivities: Rhetorical Questions in Atef Abu Saif’s The Drone Eats with Me: A Gaza Diary Women and the Autobiographical Impulse: A History
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1