Contrast sensitivity before and after small incision lenticule extraction and femtosecond laser in situ keratomileusis

A. Pradhan, Kishore R Pradhan, G. Shrestha, Purushottam Dhunganga, Raju Kaiti
{"title":"Contrast sensitivity before and after small incision lenticule extraction and femtosecond laser in situ keratomileusis","authors":"A. Pradhan, Kishore R Pradhan, G. Shrestha, Purushottam Dhunganga, Raju Kaiti","doi":"10.35119/asjoo.v16i4.417","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Contrast sensitivity function after laser ablation of the cornea in refractive surgery is an important tool for measuring quality of visual function. The effect of small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) and femtosecond laser in situ keratomileusis (FS-LASIK) on visual function can be compared by measuring spatial contrast sensitivity. \nPurpose: This study was to compare contrast sensitivity function in patients undergoing refractive surgery for myopia at Tilganga Institute of Ophthalmology. \nMethods: In a retrospective study, 15 subjects who underwent refractive surgeries comprising 9 cases of SMILE and 6 cases of FS-LASIK at Tilganga Eye Hospital were enrolled in the study. A major assessment included best corrected monocular contrast sensitivity with functional vision analyzer at spatial frequencies of 1.5, 3, 6, 12, and 18 cycles/deg in photopic condition (85 cd/m2) before, 3 months, and 1 year after the surgery. The average functional acuity contrast test scores for each spatial frequency were recorded. Differences between preoperative and postoperative contrast sensitivity at each spatial frequency were analyzed through parametric paired Student’s t-test. \nResults: Contrast sensitivity of postoperative FS-LASIK and SMILE did not differ from preoperative values at a photopic level. However, at high spatial frequency (12 and 18 cycles/deg), contrast sensitivity function improved significantly (p < 0.05) in eyes after FS-LASIK. Eyes after SMILE surgery did not show any reduction in contrast sensitivity at all the spatial frequencies. \nConclusion: Under photopic conditions, the contrast sensitivity function is unaffected by SMILE or FS-LASIK.","PeriodicalId":39864,"journal":{"name":"Asian Journal of Ophthalmology","volume":"16 1","pages":"284-292"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Journal of Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35119/asjoo.v16i4.417","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Contrast sensitivity function after laser ablation of the cornea in refractive surgery is an important tool for measuring quality of visual function. The effect of small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) and femtosecond laser in situ keratomileusis (FS-LASIK) on visual function can be compared by measuring spatial contrast sensitivity. Purpose: This study was to compare contrast sensitivity function in patients undergoing refractive surgery for myopia at Tilganga Institute of Ophthalmology. Methods: In a retrospective study, 15 subjects who underwent refractive surgeries comprising 9 cases of SMILE and 6 cases of FS-LASIK at Tilganga Eye Hospital were enrolled in the study. A major assessment included best corrected monocular contrast sensitivity with functional vision analyzer at spatial frequencies of 1.5, 3, 6, 12, and 18 cycles/deg in photopic condition (85 cd/m2) before, 3 months, and 1 year after the surgery. The average functional acuity contrast test scores for each spatial frequency were recorded. Differences between preoperative and postoperative contrast sensitivity at each spatial frequency were analyzed through parametric paired Student’s t-test. Results: Contrast sensitivity of postoperative FS-LASIK and SMILE did not differ from preoperative values at a photopic level. However, at high spatial frequency (12 and 18 cycles/deg), contrast sensitivity function improved significantly (p < 0.05) in eyes after FS-LASIK. Eyes after SMILE surgery did not show any reduction in contrast sensitivity at all the spatial frequencies. Conclusion: Under photopic conditions, the contrast sensitivity function is unaffected by SMILE or FS-LASIK.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
小切口晶状体摘除和飞秒激光原位角膜磨除术前后的对比敏感度
介绍:屈光手术中角膜激光消融后的对比敏感度是衡量视功能质量的重要工具。通过测量空间对比敏感度,比较小切口晶状体摘除(SMILE)和飞秒激光原位角膜磨成形术(FS-LASIK)对视觉功能的影响。目的:比较Tilganga眼科研究所近视屈光手术患者的对比敏感度功能。方法:回顾性研究在Tilganga眼科医院接受屈光手术的15例患者,其中SMILE手术9例,FS-LASIK手术6例。主要评估包括在光化条件下(85 cd/m2),术前、术后3个月和1年后,使用功能性视觉分析仪在1.5、3、6、12和18周期/度的空间频率下,最佳矫正单眼对比敏感度。记录每个空间频率的平均功能敏锐度对比测试分数。通过参数配对学生t检验分析术前和术后各空间频率对比敏感度的差异。结果:术后FS-LASIK和SMILE的对比敏感度在光水平上与术前没有差异。然而,在高空间频率(12和18周期/度)下,FS-LASIK术后眼睛的对比敏感度功能显著改善(p < 0.05)。SMILE手术后的眼睛在所有的空间频率上都没有显示出对比敏感度的降低。结论:在光敏条件下,SMILE和FS-LASIK的对比敏感度功能不受影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Asian Journal of Ophthalmology
Asian Journal of Ophthalmology Medicine-Ophthalmology
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Asian Journal of OPHTHALMOLOGY is the official peer-reviewed journal of the South East Asia Glaucoma Interest Group (SEAGIG) and is indexed in EMBASE/Excerpta Medica. Asian Journal of OPHTHALMOLOGY is published quarterly (four [4] issues per year) by Scientific Communications International Limited. The journal is published on-line only and is distributed free of cost via the SEAGIG website.
期刊最新文献
Is zero incidence of postoperative endophthalmitis after cataract surgery achievable Is indiscriminate use of intracameral prophylactic antibiotics in cataract surgery appropriate Ultrasound monitoring for minocyclineinduced idiopathic intracranial hypertension Subconjunctival antibiotics: an alternative to intracameral antibiotics for endophthalmitis prophylaxis in cataract surgery Changes in practice guidelines and regulations in ophthalmology due to COVID-19
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1