The Public Participation of Civic Initiative Groups during the Covid-19 Pandemic in Romania. An Exploration of Public Participation Definitions, Obstacles, and Opportunities

IF 1.1 Q3 PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION NISPAcee Journal of Public Administration and Policy Pub Date : 2022-12-01 DOI:10.2478/nispa-2022-0019
C. Voinea, Constantin M. Profiroiu, Alina G. Profiroiu
{"title":"The Public Participation of Civic Initiative Groups during the Covid-19 Pandemic in Romania. An Exploration of Public Participation Definitions, Obstacles, and Opportunities","authors":"C. Voinea, Constantin M. Profiroiu, Alina G. Profiroiu","doi":"10.2478/nispa-2022-0019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The COVID-19 pandemic has brought significant changes to the daily lives of citizens, their interactions with their communities, the nongovernmental sector and the public administration, as well as threatening the continuity of the civic initiatives they had developed. This paper draws on the scientific literature on public participation and uses qualitative methods of inquiry (semi-structured interviews) to explore how external factors, in this case the COVID-19 pandemic, affected the public participation of citizens organised in civic initiative groups in Bucharest, Romania. One key contribution of the study pertains to the interplay between practice and the conceptual level of public participation. In this respect, the results showed that many members of civic group perceive it to be genuinely contradictory in practice in their definitions of public participation. However, their ideal visions of public participation in genuine democratic politics are markedly collaborative. The research showed that the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on civic groups has been quite limited, adding obstacles to public participation but also enabling opportunities. In particular, it can be concluded that the pandemic has exacerbated pre-existing challenges. It should also be noted that co-creation of public services can be defined by a certain level of continuity, especially in the case of civic groups that were involved in co-initiation.","PeriodicalId":43378,"journal":{"name":"NISPAcee Journal of Public Administration and Policy","volume":"15 1","pages":"194 - 219"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NISPAcee Journal of Public Administration and Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/nispa-2022-0019","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract The COVID-19 pandemic has brought significant changes to the daily lives of citizens, their interactions with their communities, the nongovernmental sector and the public administration, as well as threatening the continuity of the civic initiatives they had developed. This paper draws on the scientific literature on public participation and uses qualitative methods of inquiry (semi-structured interviews) to explore how external factors, in this case the COVID-19 pandemic, affected the public participation of citizens organised in civic initiative groups in Bucharest, Romania. One key contribution of the study pertains to the interplay between practice and the conceptual level of public participation. In this respect, the results showed that many members of civic group perceive it to be genuinely contradictory in practice in their definitions of public participation. However, their ideal visions of public participation in genuine democratic politics are markedly collaborative. The research showed that the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on civic groups has been quite limited, adding obstacles to public participation but also enabling opportunities. In particular, it can be concluded that the pandemic has exacerbated pre-existing challenges. It should also be noted that co-creation of public services can be defined by a certain level of continuity, especially in the case of civic groups that were involved in co-initiation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
罗马尼亚新冠肺炎大流行期间公民倡议团体的公众参与。公众参与的定义、障碍与机遇探析
2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行给公民的日常生活、与社区、非政府部门和公共行政部门的互动带来了重大变化,并威胁到他们制定的公民倡议的连续性。本文借鉴了有关公众参与的科学文献,并使用定性调查方法(半结构化访谈)来探讨外部因素(在本例中为COVID-19大流行)如何影响罗马尼亚布加勒斯特公民倡议团体组织的公民的公众参与。该研究的一个关键贡献涉及实践与公众参与概念层面之间的相互作用。在这方面,结果表明,许多公民团体成员对公众参与的定义在实践中确实存在矛盾。然而,他们对公众参与真正民主政治的理想愿景显然是合作性的。研究结果显示,新冠疫情对市民团体的影响非常有限,虽然给市民参与增加了障碍,但也为市民提供了机会。特别是,可以得出的结论是,这一流行病加剧了已有的挑战。还应当指出,共同创建公共服务可以通过一定程度的连续性来界定,特别是在参与共同发起的民间团体的情况下。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
18.20%
发文量
10
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊最新文献
Assessing Individuals’ Perceptions of the Impact of Corruption on the Domains of Sustainable Development: A Cross-sectional Study in Palestine Reducing Error Rate in Property Tax Declaration Forms through Simplification and Highlighting Instructions Procedural Challenges of Cross-border Cooperation and Consistency in Personal Data Protection in the EU Hierarchical Clustering of the European Countries from the Perspective of E-government, E-participation, and Human Development Reorganising Local Public Utilities: Where and Why We Can Argue for the Remunicipalization Trends?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1