Abstracts Book 2023

IF 0.2 Q4 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Journal of Clinical Urology Pub Date : 2023-05-10 DOI:10.1177/20514158231172341
Mr John Fitzpatrick, M. Shaw, A. Rogers, J. Sayer
{"title":"Abstracts Book 2023","authors":"Mr John Fitzpatrick, M. Shaw, A. Rogers, J. Sayer","doi":"10.1177/20514158231172341","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Patients with urolithiasis undergo regular follow-up. PROM based follow up using the USIQoL would be innovative and resource friendly, if matches traditional outcomes. We undertook a study to assess the feasibility of using the USIQoL as a tool for virtual follow-up. Patients (or Materials) & Methods: The study involved 2 phases. The 1st phase was the development of the USIQoL based model using existing data. The 2nd phase involved prospective, single-blind application of the model (for outpatient follow-up), over a 12 months. The outcomes were need for intervention or not, based on clinical/radiological data. We assessed correlation between the USIQoL scores and clinical outcomes, and also formulated potential USIQol cut-off scores which could be used to discriminate between intervention/no intervention (i.e., follow-up only). This was done using Binomial Logistic regression (BLR), ROC curves and Youden Index. Results: 441 patients [average age group 46-64, M=298, F=143]. The relationship between USIQoL scores and clinical outcome was statistically significant [BLR: PPH exp(B) 1.148, p <0.001, 95% CI 1.063-1.240; PSH exp (B) 1.179, p 0.025, 95% CI 1.020-1.363]. The chosen cut-off scores were PPH 8 and PSH 10. Application of the model with the cut-offs demonstrated appropriate sensitivities and specificities [PPH sensitivity 0.861, specificity 0.400; PSH sensitivity 0.861, specificity 0.420]. Conclusions: This novel feasibility study demonstrates the potential of the USIQoL to be used as an aid to virtual follow-up using the proposed cut-off scores. This could transform outpatient care of patients with urinary calculi. Further larger scale study will confirm our findings.","PeriodicalId":15471,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Urology","volume":"16 1","pages":"4 - 84"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Urology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20514158231172341","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Introduction: Patients with urolithiasis undergo regular follow-up. PROM based follow up using the USIQoL would be innovative and resource friendly, if matches traditional outcomes. We undertook a study to assess the feasibility of using the USIQoL as a tool for virtual follow-up. Patients (or Materials) & Methods: The study involved 2 phases. The 1st phase was the development of the USIQoL based model using existing data. The 2nd phase involved prospective, single-blind application of the model (for outpatient follow-up), over a 12 months. The outcomes were need for intervention or not, based on clinical/radiological data. We assessed correlation between the USIQoL scores and clinical outcomes, and also formulated potential USIQol cut-off scores which could be used to discriminate between intervention/no intervention (i.e., follow-up only). This was done using Binomial Logistic regression (BLR), ROC curves and Youden Index. Results: 441 patients [average age group 46-64, M=298, F=143]. The relationship between USIQoL scores and clinical outcome was statistically significant [BLR: PPH exp(B) 1.148, p <0.001, 95% CI 1.063-1.240; PSH exp (B) 1.179, p 0.025, 95% CI 1.020-1.363]. The chosen cut-off scores were PPH 8 and PSH 10. Application of the model with the cut-offs demonstrated appropriate sensitivities and specificities [PPH sensitivity 0.861, specificity 0.400; PSH sensitivity 0.861, specificity 0.420]. Conclusions: This novel feasibility study demonstrates the potential of the USIQoL to be used as an aid to virtual follow-up using the proposed cut-off scores. This could transform outpatient care of patients with urinary calculi. Further larger scale study will confirm our findings.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
摘要第2023卷
引言:尿石症患者定期随访。如果与传统结果相匹配,使用USIQoL的基于PROM的后续行动将是创新的,资源友好的。我们进行了一项研究,以评估使用USIQoL作为虚拟随访工具的可行性。患者(或材料)和方法:研究分为两个阶段。第一阶段是利用现有数据开发基于USIQoL的模型。第二阶段涉及该模型的前瞻性、单盲应用(用于门诊随访),为期12个月。根据临床/放射学数据,结果是否需要干预。我们评估了USIQoL评分与临床结果之间的相关性,并制定了潜在的USIQoL临界评分,可用于区分干预/不干预(即仅随访)。这是使用二项式逻辑回归(BLR)、ROC曲线和Youden指数进行的。结果:441例[平均年龄46-64岁,M=298,F=143]。USIQoL评分与临床结果之间的关系具有统计学意义[BLR:PPH exp(B)1.148,p<0.001,95%CI 1.063-1.240;PSH exp(A)1.179,p 0.025,95%CI 1.020-1.363]。所选的分界分为PPH 8和PSH 10。具有截止值的模型的应用证明了适当的敏感性和特异性[PPH敏感性0.861,特异性0.400;PSH灵敏度0.861,特异性0.420]。结论:这项新的可行性研究证明了USIQoL有潜力使用拟议的截止值作为虚拟随访的辅助。这可以改变泌尿系结石患者的门诊护理。进一步的大规模研究将证实我们的发现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Urology
Journal of Clinical Urology UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Diagnostic value of the abnormal digital rectal examination in the modern MRI-based prostate cancer diagnostic pathway. Comparison of the diagnostic utility of CHOKAI, STONE and STONE PLUS scores in predicting ureteral stones larger than 5 mm Quality of life and healthcare resource use in patients with bladder pain syndrome: A survey of UK patients Analysis of the learning curve for Retzius-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy for a single surgeon Effectiveness of intravesical glycosaminoglycans in the treatment of recurrent urinary tract infections: Systematic review and meta-analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1