Quantitative EEG features and machine learning classifiers for eye-blink artifact detection: A comparative study

Maliha Rashida, Mohammad Ashfak Habib
{"title":"Quantitative EEG features and machine learning classifiers for eye-blink artifact detection: A comparative study","authors":"Maliha Rashida,&nbsp;Mohammad Ashfak Habib","doi":"10.1016/j.neuri.2022.100115","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Ocular artifact, namely eye-blink artifact, is an inevitable and one of the most destructive noises of EEG signals. Many solutions of detecting the eye-blink artifact were proposed. Different subsets of EEG features and Machine Learning (ML) classifiers were used for this purpose. But no comprehensive comparison of these features and ML classifiers was presented. This paper presents the comparison of twelve EEG features and five ML classifiers, commonly used in existing studies for the detection of eye-blink artifacts. An EEG dataset, containing 2958 epochs of eye-blink, non-eye-blink, and eye-blink-like (non-eye-blink) EEG activities, is used in this study. The performance of each feature and classifier has been measured using accuracy, precision, recall, and f1-score. Experimental results reveal that scalp topography is the most potential among the selected features in detecting eye-blink artifacts. The best performing classifier is Artificial Neural Network (ANN) among the five classifiers. The combination of scalp topography and ANN classifier performed as the most powerful feature-classifier combination. However, it is expected that the findings of this study will help the future researchers to select appropriate features and classifiers in building eye-blink artifact detection models.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":74295,"journal":{"name":"Neuroscience informatics","volume":"3 1","pages":"Article 100115"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuroscience informatics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772528622000772","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Ocular artifact, namely eye-blink artifact, is an inevitable and one of the most destructive noises of EEG signals. Many solutions of detecting the eye-blink artifact were proposed. Different subsets of EEG features and Machine Learning (ML) classifiers were used for this purpose. But no comprehensive comparison of these features and ML classifiers was presented. This paper presents the comparison of twelve EEG features and five ML classifiers, commonly used in existing studies for the detection of eye-blink artifacts. An EEG dataset, containing 2958 epochs of eye-blink, non-eye-blink, and eye-blink-like (non-eye-blink) EEG activities, is used in this study. The performance of each feature and classifier has been measured using accuracy, precision, recall, and f1-score. Experimental results reveal that scalp topography is the most potential among the selected features in detecting eye-blink artifacts. The best performing classifier is Artificial Neural Network (ANN) among the five classifiers. The combination of scalp topography and ANN classifier performed as the most powerful feature-classifier combination. However, it is expected that the findings of this study will help the future researchers to select appropriate features and classifiers in building eye-blink artifact detection models.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
用于眨眼伪影检测的定量脑电特征和机器学习分类器的比较研究
眼伪影即眨眼伪影是脑电信号中不可避免的、最具破坏性的噪声之一。提出了多种检测眨眼伪影的方法。不同的EEG特征子集和机器学习(ML)分类器被用于此目的。但是没有对这些特征和ML分类器进行全面的比较。本文对12个EEG特征和5个ML分类器进行了比较,这5个分类器是现有研究中常用的眨眼伪影检测方法。本研究使用的EEG数据集包含2958个周期的眨眼、非眨眼和类眨眼(非眨眼)EEG活动。每个特征和分类器的性能都使用准确性、精度、召回率和f1-score来衡量。实验结果表明,头皮地形特征在检测眨眼伪影中最有潜力。在这五种分类器中,表现最好的分类器是人工神经网络(ANN)。头皮地形与神经网络分类器的结合是最有效的特征分类器组合。然而,本研究的发现将有助于未来研究者在构建眨眼伪影检测模型时选择合适的特征和分类器。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Neuroscience informatics
Neuroscience informatics Surgery, Radiology and Imaging, Information Systems, Neurology, Artificial Intelligence, Computer Science Applications, Signal Processing, Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, Health Informatics, Clinical Neurology, Pathology and Medical Technology
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
57 days
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Contents Integrated analysis of lncRNA-miRNA-mRNA ceRNA network in neurodegenerative diseases Topic modeling of neuropsychiatric diseases related to gut microbiota and gut brain axis using artificial intelligence based BERTopic model on PubMed abstracts Brain network analysis in Parkinson's disease patients based on graph theory
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1