Peer-research learning and mentoring for undergraduate medical students: Benefits and challenges

M. Jafari, AmirAli Moodi Ghalibaf
{"title":"Peer-research learning and mentoring for undergraduate medical students: Benefits and challenges","authors":"M. Jafari, AmirAli Moodi Ghalibaf","doi":"10.34172/rdme.2022.019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Dear Editor, Today, research efficiency is a critical element not only for scientific institutions but also for governments. Previous studies indicate that outstanding high-impact research requires the collaboration of professional researchers and teams of experts.1 An essential step toward establishing expert researchers and professional research teams involves the collaboration of a professional instructor to train and guide the learners during their research process.2 On the other hand, peer learning, peer education, and peer mentoring should not be neglected in this field of education, teaching, and learning, as well as training. Despite inadequacy in standard research courses for undergraduate students, experiential learning and mentorship can significantly improve the quality of research by inculcating a research culture among junior students.3 Evidence suggests that peer-research education and mentoring can have beneficial effects on undergraduate students, although Lev et al. defined mentoring as occurring when: “...a senior person or mentor provides information, advice, and emotional support to a junior person or student over a period of time.”4 Therefore, this letter investigates the benefits and challenges of peer-research learning and mentoring for undergraduate medical students. First, it is necessary to develop a course protocol outlining how teaching, learning, and training will occur to establish a standard training program. According to standard research training courses and protocols, several main topics are necessary for understanding how to conduct research, including conceptualization of priority research problems, development of fundable research proposals, ethical data collection, data analysis and evaluation of results, manuscript writing, and dissemination.5 A peer undergraduate medical student who has handled some research projects, published several articles, presented at conferences, and is generally recognized as a researcher, can identify and fill in gaps in the previous protocols. Nevertheless, since developing protocols requires expertise in a specific field, an undergraduate medical student, as a peer with trainees, may have to seek guidance from senior experts before writing course protocols.6 For the second step, it is necessary to transfer information and teach theoretical topics. As a result of previous experiences and studies, peer-to-peer teaching and learning both offer more benefits than limitations. Specifically, peer-to-peer learning helps students improve their attitudes toward education, foster a more personalized learning experience, participate in cooperative learning, and contribute to higher academic achievement. In addition, peer teachers gain confidence, sharpen their skills, provide cost-effective training courses, and improve student teamwork.7,8 In addition to these benefits, peer-to-peer learning may be limited or impeded by knowledge gaps among peers, although peers intend to control the atmosphere of the teaching course and competitive performance. In addition, peers may encounter other challenges due to their limited authority in certain areas.9 Research education requires theoretical and practical information; therefore, after course planning and the transfer of theoretical information, it is crucial to improve the research skills of the target teaching population. The practical training course aims mainly to review theoretical lessons in practice, share and transfer valuable experience, and encourage trainees to improve their skills. To the best of our knowledge and experience in the current study, peer-research mentoring can help students gain a deeper understanding of their contributions, encourage student-mentor interaction, and allow them to extend the duration of their research experiences. Furthermore, in previous studies, undergraduate medical students have expressed positive attitudes and perceptions toward peerto-peer research mentoring, and similar peer-to-peer","PeriodicalId":21087,"journal":{"name":"Research and Development in Medical Education","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research and Development in Medical Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34172/rdme.2022.019","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Dear Editor, Today, research efficiency is a critical element not only for scientific institutions but also for governments. Previous studies indicate that outstanding high-impact research requires the collaboration of professional researchers and teams of experts.1 An essential step toward establishing expert researchers and professional research teams involves the collaboration of a professional instructor to train and guide the learners during their research process.2 On the other hand, peer learning, peer education, and peer mentoring should not be neglected in this field of education, teaching, and learning, as well as training. Despite inadequacy in standard research courses for undergraduate students, experiential learning and mentorship can significantly improve the quality of research by inculcating a research culture among junior students.3 Evidence suggests that peer-research education and mentoring can have beneficial effects on undergraduate students, although Lev et al. defined mentoring as occurring when: “...a senior person or mentor provides information, advice, and emotional support to a junior person or student over a period of time.”4 Therefore, this letter investigates the benefits and challenges of peer-research learning and mentoring for undergraduate medical students. First, it is necessary to develop a course protocol outlining how teaching, learning, and training will occur to establish a standard training program. According to standard research training courses and protocols, several main topics are necessary for understanding how to conduct research, including conceptualization of priority research problems, development of fundable research proposals, ethical data collection, data analysis and evaluation of results, manuscript writing, and dissemination.5 A peer undergraduate medical student who has handled some research projects, published several articles, presented at conferences, and is generally recognized as a researcher, can identify and fill in gaps in the previous protocols. Nevertheless, since developing protocols requires expertise in a specific field, an undergraduate medical student, as a peer with trainees, may have to seek guidance from senior experts before writing course protocols.6 For the second step, it is necessary to transfer information and teach theoretical topics. As a result of previous experiences and studies, peer-to-peer teaching and learning both offer more benefits than limitations. Specifically, peer-to-peer learning helps students improve their attitudes toward education, foster a more personalized learning experience, participate in cooperative learning, and contribute to higher academic achievement. In addition, peer teachers gain confidence, sharpen their skills, provide cost-effective training courses, and improve student teamwork.7,8 In addition to these benefits, peer-to-peer learning may be limited or impeded by knowledge gaps among peers, although peers intend to control the atmosphere of the teaching course and competitive performance. In addition, peers may encounter other challenges due to their limited authority in certain areas.9 Research education requires theoretical and practical information; therefore, after course planning and the transfer of theoretical information, it is crucial to improve the research skills of the target teaching population. The practical training course aims mainly to review theoretical lessons in practice, share and transfer valuable experience, and encourage trainees to improve their skills. To the best of our knowledge and experience in the current study, peer-research mentoring can help students gain a deeper understanding of their contributions, encourage student-mentor interaction, and allow them to extend the duration of their research experiences. Furthermore, in previous studies, undergraduate medical students have expressed positive attitudes and perceptions toward peerto-peer research mentoring, and similar peer-to-peer
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
医学本科生的同行研究学习和指导:好处和挑战
尊敬的编辑:今天,研究效率不仅是科学机构的关键因素,也是政府的关键因素。先前的研究表明,杰出的高影响力研究需要专业研究人员和专家团队的合作。1建立专家研究人员和专业研究团队的一个重要步骤是专业讲师的合作,在研究过程中对学习者进行培训和指导。2另一方面,同伴学习、同伴教育,在教育、教学和培训领域,不应忽视同伴指导。尽管本科生的标准研究课程不足,但体验式学习和指导可以通过在低年级学生中灌输研究文化来显著提高研究质量。3有证据表明,同伴研究教育和指导可以对本科生产生有益影响,尽管Lev等人将辅导定义为:“……资深人士或导师在一段时间内为初级人士或学生提供信息、建议和情感支持。”4因此,这封信调查了同行研究学习和辅导对医学本科生的好处和挑战。首先,有必要制定一个课程协议,概述如何进行教学、学习和培训,以建立一个标准的培训计划。根据标准的研究培训课程和协议,了解如何进行研究需要几个主要主题,包括优先研究问题的概念化、可资助研究提案的制定、伦理数据收集、数据分析和结果评估、手稿撰写、,和传播。5一个处理过一些研究项目、发表过几篇文章、在会议上发表过演讲并被公认为研究人员的医学本科生,可以识别和填补以前协议中的空白。然而,由于制定协议需要特定领域的专业知识,医学本科生作为学员的同龄人,在编写课程协议之前,可能必须寻求高级专家的指导。6第二步,有必要传递信息并教授理论主题。根据以往的经验和研究,对等教学都提供了更多的好处而不是局限性。具体而言,对等学习有助于学生改善对教育的态度,培养更个性化的学习体验,参与合作学习,并为更高的学术成就做出贡献。此外,同伴教师可以增强信心,提高技能,提供成本效益高的培训课程,并提高学生的团队合作能力。7,8除了这些好处之外,同伴之间的知识差距可能会限制或阻碍同伴学习,尽管同伴有意控制教学课程的氛围和竞争表现。此外,由于同龄人在某些领域的权威有限,他们可能会遇到其他挑战。9研究性教育需要理论和实践信息;因此,经过课程规划和理论信息的传递,提高目标教学人群的研究技能至关重要。实践培训课程主要是为了在实践中复习理论课,分享和传授宝贵经验,鼓励学员提高技能。根据我们在当前研究中的知识和经验,同行研究指导可以帮助学生更深入地了解自己的贡献,鼓励学生与导师互动,并使他们能够延长研究经历的持续时间。此外,在之前的研究中,医学本科生对同行研究指导和类似的同行研究表达了积极的态度和看法
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
19
审稿时长
18 weeks
期刊最新文献
The role of academic stress and scientific motivation in predicting research spirit among the students of medicalsciences The relationship between identity development and medical students’ performance in technology-integrated English language classrooms Challenges in the educational system of maxillofacial surgery residency training in Iran: Monodisciplinarity system or dual degree system? The use of social media (communication applications) in the training of medical students, especially oral and maxillofacial surgery residents in Iran Challenges and acceptance of e-teaching among medical professionals during the COVID-19 pandemic
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1