Revealing the challenges facing Georgia’s wine industry from a natural winemaker perspective using Q-methodology

A. Svanidze, Montserrat Costa-Font
{"title":"Revealing the challenges facing Georgia’s wine industry from a natural winemaker perspective using Q-methodology","authors":"A. Svanidze, Montserrat Costa-Font","doi":"10.1108/ijwbr-06-2021-0036","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThere is limited participatory research, including, organic winemakers and none with natural winemakers. To get a preliminary insight into the perspectives of Georgian natural winemakers, this research aims to identify their perceptions regarding the major problems facing Georgia’s wine industry by applying Q-methodology. The research uncovers two existing perspectives and provides relevant policy suggestions for the Georgian wine sector.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThis research applied Q-methodology. Ten in-person Q-sorts and interviews were carried out in Georgia, with five natural winemakers filling out an additional follow-up survey rating 26 possible policy recommendations to increase the relevance of the study’s findings.\n\n\nFindings\nThe study revealed two groups of winemakers: the idealists and the pragmatists. The idealists are characterised by their focus on environmental awareness and a lack of trust of government institutions. The pragmatists focus on production-related issues, such as lack of financing and lack of irrigation infrastructure. The development of a local wine bottle supplier, regulation of agro-chemical use and a leading role for natural winemakers in teaching about organic viticulture were the most positively rated policy recommendations.\n\n\nPractical implications\nUsing the research results, relevant sectoral policies can be drawn up that support the sustainable development of Georgia’s wine sector and help with the establishment of Georgian wine on the international market.\n\n\nSocial implications\nThe growth of natural winemaking through small-scale producers could improve the environmental sustainability of the wine industry in Georgia, as well as reduce rural poverty through increased rural household income and employment.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nTo the best of the authors’ knowledge, no participatory research currently exists that includes natural winemakers and their attitudes, and there are no participative studies with Georgian winemakers. This is the first study, to the best of the authors’ knowledge, to apply Q-methodology and a follow-up survey exclusively to Georgian natural winemakers and provides a first insight into their perceptions.\n","PeriodicalId":46955,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Wine Business Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Wine Business Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/ijwbr-06-2021-0036","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Purpose There is limited participatory research, including, organic winemakers and none with natural winemakers. To get a preliminary insight into the perspectives of Georgian natural winemakers, this research aims to identify their perceptions regarding the major problems facing Georgia’s wine industry by applying Q-methodology. The research uncovers two existing perspectives and provides relevant policy suggestions for the Georgian wine sector. Design/methodology/approach This research applied Q-methodology. Ten in-person Q-sorts and interviews were carried out in Georgia, with five natural winemakers filling out an additional follow-up survey rating 26 possible policy recommendations to increase the relevance of the study’s findings. Findings The study revealed two groups of winemakers: the idealists and the pragmatists. The idealists are characterised by their focus on environmental awareness and a lack of trust of government institutions. The pragmatists focus on production-related issues, such as lack of financing and lack of irrigation infrastructure. The development of a local wine bottle supplier, regulation of agro-chemical use and a leading role for natural winemakers in teaching about organic viticulture were the most positively rated policy recommendations. Practical implications Using the research results, relevant sectoral policies can be drawn up that support the sustainable development of Georgia’s wine sector and help with the establishment of Georgian wine on the international market. Social implications The growth of natural winemaking through small-scale producers could improve the environmental sustainability of the wine industry in Georgia, as well as reduce rural poverty through increased rural household income and employment. Originality/value To the best of the authors’ knowledge, no participatory research currently exists that includes natural winemakers and their attitudes, and there are no participative studies with Georgian winemakers. This is the first study, to the best of the authors’ knowledge, to apply Q-methodology and a follow-up survey exclusively to Georgian natural winemakers and provides a first insight into their perceptions.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
从自然酿酒师的角度使用q -方法论揭示格鲁吉亚葡萄酒行业面临的挑战
目的参与性研究有限,包括有机酿酒师,没有天然酿酒师。为了初步了解格鲁吉亚天然酿酒师的观点,本研究旨在通过应用q -方法论来确定他们对格鲁吉亚葡萄酒行业面临的主要问题的看法。该研究揭示了两种现有的观点,并为格鲁吉亚葡萄酒行业提供了相关的政策建议。本研究采用q -方法学。在乔治亚州进行了10次面对面的q排序和访谈,5位天然酿酒师填写了一份额外的后续调查,对26项可能的政策建议进行评级,以提高研究结果的相关性。研究发现酿酒师分为两类:理想主义者和实用主义者。理想主义者的特点是注重环保意识,对政府机构缺乏信任。实用主义者关注与生产有关的问题,如缺乏资金和灌溉基础设施。发展当地酒瓶供应商、规范农业化学品使用以及让天然酿酒师在有机葡萄栽培教学中发挥主导作用是得到最积极评价的政策建议。根据研究结果,可以制定相关的行业政策,支持格鲁吉亚葡萄酒行业的可持续发展,并有助于格鲁吉亚葡萄酒在国际市场上的建立。社会影响通过小规模生产者的天然葡萄酒酿造的增长可以改善格鲁吉亚葡萄酒行业的环境可持续性,并通过增加农村家庭收入和就业来减少农村贫困。原创性/价值据作者所知,目前还没有涉及天然酿酒师及其态度的参与性研究,也没有涉及格鲁吉亚酿酒师的参与性研究。据作者所知,这是第一个应用q -方法论的研究,并对格鲁吉亚天然酿酒师进行了专门的后续调查,并首次深入了解了他们的看法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
11.10%
发文量
23
期刊最新文献
Beyond terroir: a comparative analysis of Pinot Noir producers and business strategies in Burgundy, New Zealand and South Africa Zooming in small family wineries: exploring service quality, loyalty and the moderating role of wine involvement Understanding eco-innovation in the Hungarian wine sector Analyzing the impact of country-of-origin, geographical indication and wine world on low-involvement generation Z potential consumers’ attitudes toward wine ads When virtual others are with me: exploring the influence of social presence in virtual reality wine tourism experiences
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1