The effect of synthetic microbial spatial self-organization on the fate of antibiotic resistance genes

Biofilms Pub Date : 2020-07-01 DOI:10.5194/biofilms9-72
Yinyin Ma, David R. Johnson
{"title":"The effect of synthetic microbial spatial self-organization on the fate of antibiotic resistance genes","authors":"Yinyin Ma, David R. Johnson","doi":"10.5194/biofilms9-72","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Biofilms are considered as hotspots for the transfer of antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs), but very few studies have investigated the fate of ARGs (e.g. proliferation or elimination) in situ given different microbial spatial self-organization (SSO). SSO refers to a pervasive process during biofilm formation when microbes arrange themselves non-randomly across surfaces. So far the causes of SSO have been uncovered in a sense, however, the consequences of SSO were largely overlooked. Here, I hypothesize that the magnitude of inter-species intermixing, as one fundamental character of SSO, will determine the fate of ARG-carrying conjugative plasmid in both absence and presence of antibiotic selection. I evaluated this by performing range expansion experiments on agar plates to develop an artificial biofilm using a synthetic microbial community consisting of two isogenic Pseudomonas Stutzeri <em>A1501</em> who are facultative denitrifiers in anaerobic condition. By knocking out different functional genes responsible for different steps of denitrification I am able to modify the metabolic interactions between these two strains from competing (without trophic interaction) to cross-feeding (with trophic interaction), which will further result in different magnitude of inter-species intermixing. Competing group has lower magnitude due to demixing of two, while cross-feeding group has higher magnitude due to mixing. I observed that in the absence of antibiotic selection plasmid experienced faster pace of elimination in competing group than cross-feeding group, whereas in the presence of antibiotic selection plasmid proliferated more efficiently in cross-feeding group than competing group. These results suggest that SSO is a determining factor of the fate of ARGs in biofilms, which provides a novel perspective of better understanding ARGs-related pressing problems facing our society.</p>","PeriodicalId":87392,"journal":{"name":"Biofilms","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biofilms","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5194/biofilms9-72","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Biofilms are considered as hotspots for the transfer of antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs), but very few studies have investigated the fate of ARGs (e.g. proliferation or elimination) in situ given different microbial spatial self-organization (SSO). SSO refers to a pervasive process during biofilm formation when microbes arrange themselves non-randomly across surfaces. So far the causes of SSO have been uncovered in a sense, however, the consequences of SSO were largely overlooked. Here, I hypothesize that the magnitude of inter-species intermixing, as one fundamental character of SSO, will determine the fate of ARG-carrying conjugative plasmid in both absence and presence of antibiotic selection. I evaluated this by performing range expansion experiments on agar plates to develop an artificial biofilm using a synthetic microbial community consisting of two isogenic Pseudomonas Stutzeri A1501 who are facultative denitrifiers in anaerobic condition. By knocking out different functional genes responsible for different steps of denitrification I am able to modify the metabolic interactions between these two strains from competing (without trophic interaction) to cross-feeding (with trophic interaction), which will further result in different magnitude of inter-species intermixing. Competing group has lower magnitude due to demixing of two, while cross-feeding group has higher magnitude due to mixing. I observed that in the absence of antibiotic selection plasmid experienced faster pace of elimination in competing group than cross-feeding group, whereas in the presence of antibiotic selection plasmid proliferated more efficiently in cross-feeding group than competing group. These results suggest that SSO is a determining factor of the fate of ARGs in biofilms, which provides a novel perspective of better understanding ARGs-related pressing problems facing our society.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
合成微生物空间自组织对抗生素抗性基因命运的影响
生物膜被认为是抗生素抗性基因(ARGs)转移的热点,但很少有研究在不同的微生物空间自组织(SSO)下原位研究ARGs的命运(如增殖或消除)。SSO是指在生物膜形成过程中,微生物在表面上非随机排列的普遍过程。到目前为止,SSO的原因在某种意义上已经被揭示,但SSO的后果在很大程度上被忽视了。在这里,我假设物种间混合的程度,作为SSO的一个基本特征,将决定携带ARG的偶联质粒在不存在和存在抗生素选择的情况下的命运。我通过在琼脂平板上进行范围扩展实验来评估这一点,以使用由两个同基因假单胞菌Stutzeri A1501组成的合成微生物群落开发人工生物膜,这两个假单胞菌是厌氧条件下的兼性反硝化菌。通过敲除负责不同反硝化步骤的不同功能基因,我能够改变这两个菌株之间的代谢相互作用,从竞争(没有营养相互作用)到交叉喂养(有营养相互作用的),这将进一步导致不同程度的物种间混合。竞争组由于二者的分层而具有较低的量级,而交叉喂养组由于混合而具有较高的量级。我观察到,在没有抗生素选择质粒的情况下,竞争组比交叉喂养组的消除速度更快,而在有抗生素选择质粒时,交叉喂养组比竞争组的增殖效率更高。这些结果表明,SSO是ARGs在生物膜中命运的决定因素,这为更好地理解我们社会面临的与ARGs相关的紧迫问题提供了一个新的视角。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Global analyses imply that Stenotrophomonas maltophilia biofilms are phenotypically highly diverse despite a common transcriptome profile BiofilmQ, a software tool for quantiative image analysis of microbial biofilm communities Monitoring and quantification of bioelectrochemical biofilms by means of OCT in novel and customized reactor-setups Biofilm and productivity-associated community changes in serial-transfer experiments in heterogeneous liquid microcosms Heterogeneities in biofilms from clinical isolates under flow conditions
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1