The varieties & verities of action learning

IF 1.1 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Action Learning Pub Date : 2023-01-02 DOI:10.1080/14767333.2023.2171534
Helen Baxter, Daniela Cialfi, J. Edmonstone, M. Pedler, H. Wilson
{"title":"The varieties & verities of action learning","authors":"Helen Baxter, Daniela Cialfi, J. Edmonstone, M. Pedler, H. Wilson","doi":"10.1080/14767333.2023.2171534","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"All five reviews in this Issue illuminate particular aspects of action learning from the importance of creativity and the place of ‘active failure’ in learning to the workings of power and paradox and their impacts in organizational life and in action learning sets. We begin with Russ Vince who hails Wendy Smith and Marianne Lewis’ Both/And Thinking: Embracing Creative Tensions to Solve Your Toughest Problems for acknowledging the tensions and paradoxes characterise our lived experiences both within and without work organizations. He endorses the fulsome praise being lavished on a book that brings together the authors’ insightful academic work with ‘their confident vulnerable voices’, and in a very accessible way. As Russ points out, this book is of obvious relevance for readers of this Journal not only because it has caught the attention of so many business leaders and managers but also because it is ‘important for enthusiasts of action learning to be aware that there is always a tension between the radical potential of action learning to make change happen and the political purpose behind the use of action learning in organizations.’ Our own Helen Baxter continues with themes of power and relationships as she reviews Ghislaine Caulat’s Powerful or Powerless in the Virtual Space. This book is based on the author’s recent research with how power works in virtual meetings, including virtual action learning sets, and builds upon her long-standing interest in virtual leadership. Helen describes how the book illuminates her own understandings of what is going on in sets, especially those of a hybrid variety, where the mix of virtual and face-to-face presence can impact upon power relations. She concludes:","PeriodicalId":44898,"journal":{"name":"Action Learning","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Action Learning","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14767333.2023.2171534","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

All five reviews in this Issue illuminate particular aspects of action learning from the importance of creativity and the place of ‘active failure’ in learning to the workings of power and paradox and their impacts in organizational life and in action learning sets. We begin with Russ Vince who hails Wendy Smith and Marianne Lewis’ Both/And Thinking: Embracing Creative Tensions to Solve Your Toughest Problems for acknowledging the tensions and paradoxes characterise our lived experiences both within and without work organizations. He endorses the fulsome praise being lavished on a book that brings together the authors’ insightful academic work with ‘their confident vulnerable voices’, and in a very accessible way. As Russ points out, this book is of obvious relevance for readers of this Journal not only because it has caught the attention of so many business leaders and managers but also because it is ‘important for enthusiasts of action learning to be aware that there is always a tension between the radical potential of action learning to make change happen and the political purpose behind the use of action learning in organizations.’ Our own Helen Baxter continues with themes of power and relationships as she reviews Ghislaine Caulat’s Powerful or Powerless in the Virtual Space. This book is based on the author’s recent research with how power works in virtual meetings, including virtual action learning sets, and builds upon her long-standing interest in virtual leadership. Helen describes how the book illuminates her own understandings of what is going on in sets, especially those of a hybrid variety, where the mix of virtual and face-to-face presence can impact upon power relations. She concludes:
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
行动学习的多样性和真实性
本期的所有五篇评论都阐明了行动学习的特定方面,从创造力的重要性和“主动失败”在学习中的地位,到权力和悖论的运作及其对组织生活和行动学习集的影响。我们从Russ Vince开始,他赞扬了Wendy Smith和Marianne Lewis的《同时思考:拥抱创造性的紧张关系来解决你最棘手的问题》,承认了我们在工作组织内外的生活经历中存在的紧张和矛盾。他赞同对这本书的过分赞扬,这本书将作者富有洞察力的学术工作与“他们自信而脆弱的声音”结合在一起,以一种非常容易理解的方式。正如拉斯所指出的,这本书显然与本杂志的读者相关,不仅因为它引起了许多商业领袖和管理者的注意,还因为它“对行动学习的爱好者来说,重要的是要意识到,在行动学习推动变革的激进潜力与在组织中使用行动学习背后的政治目的之间总是存在紧张关系。”我们的海伦·巴克斯特继续以权力和关系为主题,回顾吉斯兰·考拉特的《虚拟空间中的权力或权力》。这本书是基于作者最近对权力如何在虚拟会议中发挥作用的研究,包括虚拟行动学习集,并建立在她对虚拟领导的长期兴趣之上。海伦描述了这本书如何阐明了她自己对场景中正在发生的事情的理解,尤其是那些混合类型的场景,在这些场景中,虚拟和面对面的存在的混合会影响权力关系。她总结道:
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Action Learning
Action Learning EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
40.00%
发文量
47
期刊最新文献
Critical incident technique and action learning to enable organizational learning How to facilitate critical action learning How to promote inclusion, collective intelligence and democracy Action learning aiding innovation In memoriam – Professor John Burgoyne
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1