Can reactive attachment disorder persist in nurturing placements? A systematic review and clinical case series

Q2 Social Sciences Developmental Child Welfare Pub Date : 2020-06-01 DOI:10.1177/2516103220940326
R. Nelson, G. Chadwick, M. Bruce, Genevieve Young-Southward, H. Minnis
{"title":"Can reactive attachment disorder persist in nurturing placements? A systematic review and clinical case series","authors":"R. Nelson, G. Chadwick, M. Bruce, Genevieve Young-Southward, H. Minnis","doi":"10.1177/2516103220940326","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Reactive Attachment Disorder (RAD), is characterized by failure to seek and accept comfort in maltreated children. This lack of activation of the attachment system has profound developmental disadvantages yet, in early childhood, usually resolves quickly after placement in nurturing care. Persistence of RAD into middle childhood has been demonstrated in children reared in Romanian Institutions but, in family-reared children older children, there is controversy regarding whether RAD-like behaviors are genuinely attachment-related and stable from early childhood or are, in fact, related to PTSD. We conducted two pieces of research to investigate this: 1. a systematic review to examine persistence/resolution of RAD and 2. a case series of three boys whose RAD symptoms persisted despite living in placements judged by both social and child health services to be of good quality. Our systematic review revealed a paucity of longitudinal data. Except in atypical institutionalized samples, RAD had not been evidenced beyond pre-school. All three boys in the case series met DSM 5 criteria for RAD in late childhood/early adolescence and had stable RAD symptoms since before age 5. Qualitative interviews with their families revealed common themes of family strain, frustration and resentment at the lack of support from services. This paper provides the first opportunity to generate testable hypotheses about environmental circumstances and coexisting symptomatology that may influence RAD trajectories. Persistence of RAD has profoundly negative implications for children and their families. Recognition of RAD symptoms is challenging but crucial in order to improve care of these children and their families.","PeriodicalId":36239,"journal":{"name":"Developmental Child Welfare","volume":"2 1","pages":"110 - 131"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/2516103220940326","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Developmental Child Welfare","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/2516103220940326","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Reactive Attachment Disorder (RAD), is characterized by failure to seek and accept comfort in maltreated children. This lack of activation of the attachment system has profound developmental disadvantages yet, in early childhood, usually resolves quickly after placement in nurturing care. Persistence of RAD into middle childhood has been demonstrated in children reared in Romanian Institutions but, in family-reared children older children, there is controversy regarding whether RAD-like behaviors are genuinely attachment-related and stable from early childhood or are, in fact, related to PTSD. We conducted two pieces of research to investigate this: 1. a systematic review to examine persistence/resolution of RAD and 2. a case series of three boys whose RAD symptoms persisted despite living in placements judged by both social and child health services to be of good quality. Our systematic review revealed a paucity of longitudinal data. Except in atypical institutionalized samples, RAD had not been evidenced beyond pre-school. All three boys in the case series met DSM 5 criteria for RAD in late childhood/early adolescence and had stable RAD symptoms since before age 5. Qualitative interviews with their families revealed common themes of family strain, frustration and resentment at the lack of support from services. This paper provides the first opportunity to generate testable hypotheses about environmental circumstances and coexisting symptomatology that may influence RAD trajectories. Persistence of RAD has profoundly negative implications for children and their families. Recognition of RAD symptoms is challenging but crucial in order to improve care of these children and their families.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
反应性依恋障碍能否在养育环境中持续存在?系统回顾和临床病例系列
反应性依恋障碍(RAD)的特征是受虐待儿童无法寻求和接受安慰。缺乏依恋系统的激活对儿童的发展有着深远的不利影响,但在儿童早期,这种情况通常在被安置在养育照料中心后很快得到解决。在罗马尼亚机构中长大的儿童中,RAD持续存在到童年中期,但在家庭中长大的儿童中,关于RAD样行为是否真的与依恋相关并且从童年早期开始稳定,或者实际上与创伤后应激障碍有关,存在争议。为此,我们进行了两项研究:1。一项系统的检讨,以检查持续/解决RAD和2。三名男孩的一系列病例,尽管他们居住的地方被社会和儿童保健服务机构认为质量良好,但RAD症状仍然存在。我们的系统回顾显示缺乏纵向数据。除了非典型的制度化样本外,RAD在学龄前之后没有得到证明。病例系列中的所有三名男孩均符合儿童期晚期/青春期早期RAD的DSM 5标准,并且自5岁之前就有稳定的RAD症状。对他们家庭的定性访谈揭示了家庭紧张、沮丧和对缺乏服务支持的怨恨等共同主题。本文提供了第一个机会,以产生可测试的假设关于环境条件和共存的症状,可能会影响RAD的轨迹。持续的RAD会对儿童及其家庭产生深远的负面影响。识别RAD症状具有挑战性,但对于改善对这些儿童及其家庭的护理至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Developmental Child Welfare
Developmental Child Welfare Medicine-Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
期刊最新文献
The impact of the COVID-19 measures on the lives of unaccompanied refugee minors Preparedness for adulthood among young adults with histories of out-of-home care Evaluating the impact of attachment and trauma training for children’s social care teams Evaluating the impact of attachment and trauma training for children’s social care teams Cumulative risk exposure is associated with increased risk for PTSD but not depression or anxiety. Results from a UK clinical sample of children and adolescents
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1