Comparison of the value of blood presepsin, procalcitonin and C-reactive protein in differentiating different types of pathogenic bacteria in septic patients
Z. Xiaodong, Gong Ping, W. Wenjuan, Kang Jian, Chun-Sheng Li
{"title":"Comparison of the value of blood presepsin, procalcitonin and C-reactive protein in differentiating different types of pathogenic bacteria in septic patients","authors":"Z. Xiaodong, Gong Ping, W. Wenjuan, Kang Jian, Chun-Sheng Li","doi":"10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1671-0282.2019.07.014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective \nTo compare the value of presepsin, procalcitonin (PCT) and C-reactive protein (CRP) in differentiating different types of pathogenic bacteria in septic patients. \n \n \nMethods \nA prospective study was conducted to collect 322 septic patients who met the diagnostic criteria of \"sepsis 3.0\" in the Emergency ICU of the First Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University from July 2016 to January 2018. According to the results of blood culture, patients were divided into the positive blood culture group (n=114) and negative blood culture group (n=208). Patients in the positive blood culture group were further divided into four subgroups: Gram-positive coccus (G+), Gram-negative bacilli (G-), mixed bacteria, and fungi groups. Healthy volunteers were selected as the control group (n=45). The differences in presepsin, PCT and CRP levels were compared among the groups, and the curves of the subjects' working characteristic curve (ROC) were drawn. \n \n \nResults \nPresepsin, PCT, and CRP were significantly increased in the positive blood culture and negative blood culture groups compared with the control group (all P 0.05), but PCT was significantly higher in the G- and mixed bacteria groups than that in the G+ and fungi groups (all P<0.05). Presepsin predicted a positive blood culture with area under ROC curve of 0.680, which was higher than PCT (AUC=0.599). \n \n \nConclusions \nPresepsin is more valuable than PCT in early predicting positive blood culture in septic patients, but only PCT has an ability to differentiate pathogenic bacteria in septic patients with positive blood culture. It suggested that a combination of Presepsin and PCT should be more meaningful in clinical practice. \n \n \nKey words: \nSepsis; Presepsin; Procalcitonin; C-reactive protein; Gram-positive coccus; Gram-negative bacilli; Fungi","PeriodicalId":9981,"journal":{"name":"中华急诊医学杂志","volume":"28 1","pages":"875-879"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中华急诊医学杂志","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1671-0282.2019.07.014","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Nursing","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective
To compare the value of presepsin, procalcitonin (PCT) and C-reactive protein (CRP) in differentiating different types of pathogenic bacteria in septic patients.
Methods
A prospective study was conducted to collect 322 septic patients who met the diagnostic criteria of "sepsis 3.0" in the Emergency ICU of the First Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University from July 2016 to January 2018. According to the results of blood culture, patients were divided into the positive blood culture group (n=114) and negative blood culture group (n=208). Patients in the positive blood culture group were further divided into four subgroups: Gram-positive coccus (G+), Gram-negative bacilli (G-), mixed bacteria, and fungi groups. Healthy volunteers were selected as the control group (n=45). The differences in presepsin, PCT and CRP levels were compared among the groups, and the curves of the subjects' working characteristic curve (ROC) were drawn.
Results
Presepsin, PCT, and CRP were significantly increased in the positive blood culture and negative blood culture groups compared with the control group (all P 0.05), but PCT was significantly higher in the G- and mixed bacteria groups than that in the G+ and fungi groups (all P<0.05). Presepsin predicted a positive blood culture with area under ROC curve of 0.680, which was higher than PCT (AUC=0.599).
Conclusions
Presepsin is more valuable than PCT in early predicting positive blood culture in septic patients, but only PCT has an ability to differentiate pathogenic bacteria in septic patients with positive blood culture. It suggested that a combination of Presepsin and PCT should be more meaningful in clinical practice.
Key words:
Sepsis; Presepsin; Procalcitonin; C-reactive protein; Gram-positive coccus; Gram-negative bacilli; Fungi
期刊介绍:
Chinese Journal of Emergency Medicine is the only national journal which represents the development of emergency medicine in China. The journal is supervised by China Association of Science and Technology, sponsored by Chinese Medical Association, and co-sponsored by Zhejiang University. The journal publishes original research articles dealing with all aspects of clinical practice and research in emergency medicine. The columns include Pre-Hospital Rescue, Emergency Care, Trauma, Resuscitation, Poisoning, Disaster Medicine, Continuing Education, etc. It has a wide coverage in China, and builds up communication with Hong Kong, Macao, Taiwan and international emergency medicine circles.