Diffusion-weighted image versus contrast-enhanced kinetic curves: which is more valuable in assessment of breast cancer?

Salma Abokhozayem, Hosnia Mohammed, Sally Osama
{"title":"Diffusion-weighted image versus contrast-enhanced kinetic curves: which is more valuable in assessment of breast cancer?","authors":"Salma Abokhozayem, Hosnia Mohammed, Sally Osama","doi":"10.4103/AZMJ.AZMJ_138_20","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background and aim Noninvasive radiological techniques such as dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI) and diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) can help distinguish between malignant and benign lesions of the breast. The current study was conducted to evaluate the diagnostic values of DCE-MRI and DWI in differentiation between benign and malignant breast lesions. Patients and methods This study was conducted on 30 patients with 32 lesions during the period from June 2019 to May 2020 at the Radiology Department and approved by the Ethics Committee. DCE-MRI and DWI were acquired for each patient using a 1.5 T machine with breast coils. Histopathological results were collected as a gold standard of the study. Results Of 32 lesions, histopathology revealed that 22 (68.75%) lesions were malignant and 10 (31.25%) lesions were benign. Mean apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) of benign lesions was 1.25±0.56×10−3 mm2/s, which was significantly higher than those of malignant lesions (0.93±0.42×10−3 mm2/s). DWI-MRI had high sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy in distinguishing benign from malignant lesions (90.9, 70, 86.96, 77.78, and 84.38%, respectively). However, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy of DCE-MRI were 95.5, 80, 91.3, 88.9, and 90.6%, respectively. Conclusion Compared with DWI, DCE-MRI has a higher sensitivity and specificity for distinguishing between benign and malignant lesions of the breast. Diffusion-weighted MRI provides quantitative assessment of benign and malignant lesions of the breast by measuring the ADC values.","PeriodicalId":7711,"journal":{"name":"Al-Azhar Assiut Medical Journal","volume":"20 1","pages":"163 - 171"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Al-Azhar Assiut Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/AZMJ.AZMJ_138_20","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and aim Noninvasive radiological techniques such as dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI) and diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) can help distinguish between malignant and benign lesions of the breast. The current study was conducted to evaluate the diagnostic values of DCE-MRI and DWI in differentiation between benign and malignant breast lesions. Patients and methods This study was conducted on 30 patients with 32 lesions during the period from June 2019 to May 2020 at the Radiology Department and approved by the Ethics Committee. DCE-MRI and DWI were acquired for each patient using a 1.5 T machine with breast coils. Histopathological results were collected as a gold standard of the study. Results Of 32 lesions, histopathology revealed that 22 (68.75%) lesions were malignant and 10 (31.25%) lesions were benign. Mean apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) of benign lesions was 1.25±0.56×10−3 mm2/s, which was significantly higher than those of malignant lesions (0.93±0.42×10−3 mm2/s). DWI-MRI had high sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy in distinguishing benign from malignant lesions (90.9, 70, 86.96, 77.78, and 84.38%, respectively). However, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy of DCE-MRI were 95.5, 80, 91.3, 88.9, and 90.6%, respectively. Conclusion Compared with DWI, DCE-MRI has a higher sensitivity and specificity for distinguishing between benign and malignant lesions of the breast. Diffusion-weighted MRI provides quantitative assessment of benign and malignant lesions of the breast by measuring the ADC values.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
弥散加权图像与增强动力学曲线:哪个在乳腺癌评估中更有价值?
背景和目的动态增强MRI(DCE-MRI)和扩散加权成像(DWI)等非侵入性放射学技术有助于区分乳腺良恶性病变。本研究旨在评估DCE-MRI和DWI在鉴别乳腺良恶性病变中的诊断价值。患者和方法本研究于2019年6月至2020年5月在放射科对30名32处病变的患者进行,并经伦理委员会批准。使用带有乳房线圈的1.5T机器为每位患者采集DCE-MRI和DWI。收集组织病理学结果作为研究的金标准。结果32个病灶中,22个(68.75%)病灶为恶性,10个(31.25%)病灶为良性。良性病变的平均表观扩散系数(ADC)为1.25±0.56×10−3 mm2/s,显著高于恶性病变的平均值(0.93±0.42×10− mm2/s)。DWI-MRI在区分良恶性病变方面具有较高的敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值、阴性预测值和准确性(分别为90.9%、70%、86.96%、77.78%和84.38%)。然而,DCE-MRI的敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值、阴性预测值和准确性分别为95.5%、80%、91.3%、88.9%和90.6%。结论与DWI相比,DCE-MRI对鉴别乳腺良恶性病变具有更高的敏感性和特异性。扩散加权MRI通过测量ADC值来提供乳腺良恶性病变的定量评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
审稿时长
34 weeks
期刊最新文献
Conservative management versus ventilation tube insertion in children with otitis media with effusion accompanying cleft palate A study of the effect of some musical compositions on glucagon-like peptide 1, insulin, leptin, and body weight of crowded adult albino rats Protective role of Coenzyme Q10 on ultrastructure effect of sodium fluoride on the liver of adult male albino rats Comparative study between manipulation under anesthesia combined with local steroid injection versus local steroid injection alone in resistant cases of coccydynia Oral versus intravenous omeprazole in management of bleeding peptic ulcer: a randomized controlled trial
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1