Local food policies – their constraints and drivers: Insights from Portuguese Urban Agriculture initiatives

IF 1.8 2区 社会学 Q2 GEOGRAPHY Moravian Geographical Reports Pub Date : 2020-09-01 DOI:10.2478/mgr-2020-0016
C. Delgado
{"title":"Local food policies – their constraints and drivers: Insights from Portuguese Urban Agriculture initiatives","authors":"C. Delgado","doi":"10.2478/mgr-2020-0016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Two interconnected questions are addressed in this paper: (i) why urban agriculture (UA) and food-related initiatives take usually years to materialise in Portugal; and (ii) why resilient initiatives do not scale up and shift from practices to local food policies. We argue that existing initiatives are viewed as single events and therefore garner quite limited long-term political commitment and support. Based on interviews with food champions and a literature review, four Portuguese UA initiatives are analysed and these highlight the constraints that hinder their scaling-up. We conclude that drivers to lead to scaling-up are a combination of factors, with an enabling environment the most relevant one. On the other hand, constraints are related to limited democratic governance and poor policies, insufficient funding and weak participatory processes. Such findings are quite in line with existing literature. The limited integration of Portugal within the international UA and food debates might partially explain why UA is still struggling to find its proper place in Portuguese cities and their peripheries. Raising awareness among decision makers is critical to scaling-up UA initiatives and turning them an integral component of local food systems. A national observatory able to gather relevant data and produce knowledge, assess and monitor on-going initiatives may be the key step to gather different stakeholders together, that can then better advocate and then lead to higher political support, not only in Portugal but in any country where UA and food issues are emerging.","PeriodicalId":45910,"journal":{"name":"Moravian Geographical Reports","volume":"28 1","pages":"223 - 235"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Moravian Geographical Reports","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/mgr-2020-0016","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Abstract Two interconnected questions are addressed in this paper: (i) why urban agriculture (UA) and food-related initiatives take usually years to materialise in Portugal; and (ii) why resilient initiatives do not scale up and shift from practices to local food policies. We argue that existing initiatives are viewed as single events and therefore garner quite limited long-term political commitment and support. Based on interviews with food champions and a literature review, four Portuguese UA initiatives are analysed and these highlight the constraints that hinder their scaling-up. We conclude that drivers to lead to scaling-up are a combination of factors, with an enabling environment the most relevant one. On the other hand, constraints are related to limited democratic governance and poor policies, insufficient funding and weak participatory processes. Such findings are quite in line with existing literature. The limited integration of Portugal within the international UA and food debates might partially explain why UA is still struggling to find its proper place in Portuguese cities and their peripheries. Raising awareness among decision makers is critical to scaling-up UA initiatives and turning them an integral component of local food systems. A national observatory able to gather relevant data and produce knowledge, assess and monitor on-going initiatives may be the key step to gather different stakeholders together, that can then better advocate and then lead to higher political support, not only in Portugal but in any country where UA and food issues are emerging.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
地方粮食政策——它们的制约因素和驱动因素:来自葡萄牙都市农业倡议的见解
摘要本文讨论了两个相互关联的问题:(i)为什么城市农业和粮食相关举措通常需要数年时间才能在葡萄牙实现;以及(ii)为什么有弹性的举措没有扩大规模,没有从实践转向地方粮食政策。我们认为,现有倡议被视为单一事件,因此获得的长期政治承诺和支持非常有限。根据对食品倡导者的采访和文献综述,分析了葡萄牙UA的四项举措,这些举措突出了阻碍其扩大规模的制约因素。我们得出的结论是,导致规模扩大的驱动因素是多种因素的结合,而有利的环境是最相关的因素。另一方面,制约因素与有限的民主治理和糟糕的政策、资金不足和参与进程薄弱有关。这些发现与现有文献非常一致。葡萄牙在国际UA和粮食辩论中的有限整合可能部分解释了为什么UA仍在努力在葡萄牙城市及其周边地区找到合适的位置。提高决策者的认识对于扩大UA倡议并使其成为当地粮食系统的组成部分至关重要。一个能够收集相关数据和产生知识、评估和监测正在进行的举措的国家观察站,可能是将不同的利益攸关方聚集在一起的关键步骤,这样可以更好地倡导并获得更高的政治支持,不仅在葡萄牙,而且在任何出现普遍获得和粮食问题的国家。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
4.00%
发文量
14
期刊介绍: Moravian Geographical Reports je mezinárodní časopis, publikovaný v anglickém jazyce od roku 1993 Ústavem geoniky Akademie věd ČR. Publikuje příspěvky geografů a odborníků příbuzných disciplin včetně geověd a geoekologie, které mají výraznou regionální orientaci. Základní otázku, před níž stojí v současné době tito odborníci, lze položit následovně: „Jaká je úloha regionů a lokalit v globalizované společnosti, daném geografickém měřítku a jak ji můžeme hodnotit?“
期刊最新文献
Assessing and forecasting the influence of environmental controls on windstorm disturbances in the Central Low Tatras, through regression models The divided town of Český Těšín/Cieszyn as the most integrated part of the Czech-Polish borderland: A life in the cross-border educational togetherness or side by side? Consumer perception of food value: A comparative study of global supermarkets and local farmers' markets in Slovakia The Turów coal mine international dispute as a determinant of the cross-border integration of inhabitants of the Polish-Czech border Geography of migration motives: Matching migration motives with socioeconomic data
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1