Owning Gilead: franchising feminism through Margaret Atwood’s The Handmaid’s Tale and The Testaments

IF 0.7 4区 文学 Q3 CULTURAL STUDIES European Journal of English Studies Pub Date : 2021-05-04 DOI:10.1080/13825577.2021.1950362
Daný van Dam, S. Polak
{"title":"Owning Gilead: franchising feminism through Margaret Atwood’s The Handmaid’s Tale and The Testaments","authors":"Daný van Dam, S. Polak","doi":"10.1080/13825577.2021.1950362","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Margaret Atwood’s most famous dystopian novel, The Handmaid’s Tale (1985), is one of those stories whose message seems to carry across the ages. The hyperreal patriarchy-as-terror-regime that The Handmaid’s Tale portrays has become a well-known shorthand in feminist protest culture. Its presence became even more prominent in response to Donald Trump’s 2016 election, and its visibility as a protest symbol there and at other events aimed at curbing women’s rights was strengthened by the visual imagery of the novel’s most recent adaptation. The Handmaid’s Tale and Atwood’s 2019 addition to its storyworld, The Testaments, with adaptations across media, have effectively given shape to what has become a media franchise. As its uses in the context of feminist politics and populism show, this franchise refers not only to commercial concerns; it also references a form of political enfranchisement in that it offers tools and language for calling out patriarchy. We argue that the conglomerate of Gilead media texts engenders a fraught franchise in both commercial and politically emancipatory senses. While only reluctantly ‘offering itself up’ for commercial exploitation, the franchise makes itself freely and prominently available to feminist protest culture.","PeriodicalId":43819,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of English Studies","volume":"25 1","pages":"172 - 189"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/13825577.2021.1950362","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of English Studies","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13825577.2021.1950362","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CULTURAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

ABSTRACT Margaret Atwood’s most famous dystopian novel, The Handmaid’s Tale (1985), is one of those stories whose message seems to carry across the ages. The hyperreal patriarchy-as-terror-regime that The Handmaid’s Tale portrays has become a well-known shorthand in feminist protest culture. Its presence became even more prominent in response to Donald Trump’s 2016 election, and its visibility as a protest symbol there and at other events aimed at curbing women’s rights was strengthened by the visual imagery of the novel’s most recent adaptation. The Handmaid’s Tale and Atwood’s 2019 addition to its storyworld, The Testaments, with adaptations across media, have effectively given shape to what has become a media franchise. As its uses in the context of feminist politics and populism show, this franchise refers not only to commercial concerns; it also references a form of political enfranchisement in that it offers tools and language for calling out patriarchy. We argue that the conglomerate of Gilead media texts engenders a fraught franchise in both commercial and politically emancipatory senses. While only reluctantly ‘offering itself up’ for commercial exploitation, the franchise makes itself freely and prominently available to feminist protest culture.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
拥有吉利德:通过玛格丽特·阿特伍德的《使女的故事》和《遗嘱》授权女权主义
摘要玛格丽特·阿特伍德(Margaret Atwood)最著名的反乌托邦小说《使女的故事》(The Handmaid’s Tale,1985)就是这样一部故事,它传达的信息似乎跨越了各个时代。《使女的故事》所描绘的作为恐怖政权的超现实父权制已经成为女权主义抗议文化中一个著名的缩写。在唐纳德·特朗普2016年当选后,它的出现变得更加突出,小说最新改编的视觉形象加强了它作为抗议象征在那里和其他旨在遏制妇女权利的活动中的知名度。《使女的故事》和阿特伍德2019年加入其故事世界的《遗嘱》,经过媒体改编,有效地形成了一个媒体特许经营权。正如它在女权主义政治和民粹主义背景下的使用所表明的那样,这一特许经营权不仅涉及商业问题;它还提到了一种政治选举权的形式,因为它提供了呼唤父权制的工具和语言。我们认为,吉利德媒体文本的组合在商业和政治解放意义上都产生了令人担忧的特许经营权。虽然只是不情愿地“主动”接受商业剥削,但该特许经营权使自己可以自由地、突出地接受女权主义抗议文化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
20.00%
发文量
17
期刊最新文献
Reading transformations: from David Garnett’s Lady into Fox (1922) to Sarah Hall’s “Mrs Fox” (2013) The mind is all the animals it has attended: limitrophy and porous borders in the poetry of Robert Bringhurst Root identity–relation identity in Inga Simpson’s Understory: a life with trees Deconstructing human-canine relations in Richard Adams’s The Plague Dogs Hospitality and liminality in the time of the Anthropocene: Jenn Ashworth’s Fell
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1