Reducing wait times to surgery—an international review

Tania Stafinski, F. Nagase, M. Brindle, Jonathan White, Andrea Young, S. Beesoon, S. Cleary, D. Menon
{"title":"Reducing wait times to surgery—an international review","authors":"Tania Stafinski, F. Nagase, M. Brindle, Jonathan White, Andrea Young, S. Beesoon, S. Cleary, D. Menon","doi":"10.21037/jhmhp-21-96","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":": This study aimed to describe approaches used in Canada and internationally, targeting wait times from the decision to treat to surgery (wait time 2). Access to optimal care at the right place and at the right time remains a top priority for patients, healthcare providers and policymakers. Interviews with key informants from 14 countries and a scoping review were conducted to identify approaches targeting wait times. During interviews, participants were asked about their experiences with different approaches in their jurisdictions. The scoping review adhered to published guidelines and captured both peer-reviewed and grey literature. Results were compiled into tables and synthesized based on a conceptual framework describing the main policy types for improving wait times. The study included 32 interviews, 92 peer-reviewed studies and 242 documents from the grey literature. Information spanned 17 countries across multiple surgical areas. In total, 33 approaches were identified, with the majority [24] targeting the supply-side. Fifteen approaches had consistent or limited but promising evidence supporting their effectiveness. Approaches can impact wait times 2 by targeting demand, supply or both. Successful strategies require the implementation of multiple approaches, collaborations and investments. This study may help organizations plan and implement policies intended to improve timely access to surgical care.","PeriodicalId":92075,"journal":{"name":"Journal of hospital management and health policy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of hospital management and health policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21037/jhmhp-21-96","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

: This study aimed to describe approaches used in Canada and internationally, targeting wait times from the decision to treat to surgery (wait time 2). Access to optimal care at the right place and at the right time remains a top priority for patients, healthcare providers and policymakers. Interviews with key informants from 14 countries and a scoping review were conducted to identify approaches targeting wait times. During interviews, participants were asked about their experiences with different approaches in their jurisdictions. The scoping review adhered to published guidelines and captured both peer-reviewed and grey literature. Results were compiled into tables and synthesized based on a conceptual framework describing the main policy types for improving wait times. The study included 32 interviews, 92 peer-reviewed studies and 242 documents from the grey literature. Information spanned 17 countries across multiple surgical areas. In total, 33 approaches were identified, with the majority [24] targeting the supply-side. Fifteen approaches had consistent or limited but promising evidence supporting their effectiveness. Approaches can impact wait times 2 by targeting demand, supply or both. Successful strategies require the implementation of multiple approaches, collaborations and investments. This study may help organizations plan and implement policies intended to improve timely access to surgical care.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
缩短手术等待时间——国际综述
本研究旨在描述在加拿大和国际上使用的方法,针对从决定治疗到手术的等待时间(等待时间2)。在正确的地点和正确的时间获得最佳护理仍然是患者,医疗保健提供者和政策制定者的首要任务。对来自14个国家的关键举报人进行了访谈,并进行了范围审查,以确定针对等待时间的方法。在访谈中,与会者被问及在其管辖范围内采用不同方法的经验。范围审查遵循已发表的指导方针,并收集同行评议和灰色文献。结果被编译成表格,并根据描述改善等待时间的主要策略类型的概念框架进行综合。这项研究包括32次访谈、92项同行评议研究和242份灰色文献。信息涉及17个国家的多个外科领域。总共确定了33种方法,其中大多数针对供应侧。15种方法有一致或有限但有希望的证据支持其有效性。方法可以通过瞄准需求、供应或两者来影响等待时间。成功的战略需要实施多种方法、合作和投资。本研究可能有助于组织计划和实施旨在改善及时获得外科护理的政策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Recent trends in hospital market concentration and profitability: the case of New Jersey COVID-19 outbreak and integration of social media in public health crisis communication: a case study of UMMC, Kuala Lumpur Spatial disparities in flood vulnerability in New York City Spatial and visual comparison analysis of health disparities in London neighbourhoods: the case of Southwark and Lambeth Impact of COVID-19 on operation room utilization efficiency and cardiac surgery care pathway: single centre experience
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1