Surgical Treatment of Patients with a Bicuspid Aortic Valve and Concomitant Expansion of the Ascending Aorta

O. M. Trembovetska, Olha V. Pantas, V. Kravchenko, Ivan M. Kravchenko, I. Osadovska
{"title":"Surgical Treatment of Patients with a Bicuspid Aortic Valve and Concomitant Expansion of the Ascending Aorta","authors":"O. M. Trembovetska, Olha V. Pantas, V. Kravchenko, Ivan M. Kravchenko, I. Osadovska","doi":"10.30702/ujcvs/23.31(01)/tp003-5359","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim. To evaluate the rate of long-term complications on ascending aorta after bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) replacement depending on the type of defect (stenosis or insufficiency) and to determine the indications to certain type of surgery in this category of patients. \nMaterials and methods. One hundred five patients underwent BAV replacement between 2007 and 2014. The patients were divided into two groups. Group 1 included 63 patients with stenosis prevalence, group 2 included 42 patients with insufficiency. Aortic diameter at the level of the sinuses of Valsalva and at the level of the ascending aorta was assessed preoperatively and in the long-term postoperative period. \nResults. Long-term results were studied in 86 (81.9%) patients during 6.8 ± 2.2 years at the average. Sixteen (18.6%) patients developed aortic complications: 6 (6.9%) of them had progressive dilatation (10% from initial diameter), aneurysm formation was detected in 8 cases (9.3%) with 6 cases (6.9%) of dissection, 1 patient (1.3%) had aortic rupture. Freedom from ascending aorta dilatation within 13 years after BAV replacement was 95.1% in group 1 and 62.3% in group 2. Freedom from aortic dissection within 13 years after BAV replacement was 90.1% at the average (97% in group 1 and 80.6% in group 2). \nConclusion. The tactics of aortic aneurysm correction in BAV depends on its diameter and, to a lesser extent, on the presence of stenosis or insufficiency of the valve. With existing stenosis and a diameter of the ascending aorta up to 4.5 cm, it is possible to consider correction without intervention on the ascending aorta. The presence of valve insufficiency in such a situation often requires additional manipulations on the ascending aorta.","PeriodicalId":33680,"journal":{"name":"Ukrayins''kii zhurnal sertsevosudinnoyi khirurgiyi","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ukrayins''kii zhurnal sertsevosudinnoyi khirurgiyi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30702/ujcvs/23.31(01)/tp003-5359","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The aim. To evaluate the rate of long-term complications on ascending aorta after bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) replacement depending on the type of defect (stenosis or insufficiency) and to determine the indications to certain type of surgery in this category of patients. Materials and methods. One hundred five patients underwent BAV replacement between 2007 and 2014. The patients were divided into two groups. Group 1 included 63 patients with stenosis prevalence, group 2 included 42 patients with insufficiency. Aortic diameter at the level of the sinuses of Valsalva and at the level of the ascending aorta was assessed preoperatively and in the long-term postoperative period. Results. Long-term results were studied in 86 (81.9%) patients during 6.8 ± 2.2 years at the average. Sixteen (18.6%) patients developed aortic complications: 6 (6.9%) of them had progressive dilatation (10% from initial diameter), aneurysm formation was detected in 8 cases (9.3%) with 6 cases (6.9%) of dissection, 1 patient (1.3%) had aortic rupture. Freedom from ascending aorta dilatation within 13 years after BAV replacement was 95.1% in group 1 and 62.3% in group 2. Freedom from aortic dissection within 13 years after BAV replacement was 90.1% at the average (97% in group 1 and 80.6% in group 2). Conclusion. The tactics of aortic aneurysm correction in BAV depends on its diameter and, to a lesser extent, on the presence of stenosis or insufficiency of the valve. With existing stenosis and a diameter of the ascending aorta up to 4.5 cm, it is possible to consider correction without intervention on the ascending aorta. The presence of valve insufficiency in such a situation often requires additional manipulations on the ascending aorta.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
二尖主动脉瓣伴升主动脉扩张患者的外科治疗
的目标。目的评价不同缺损类型(狭窄或不全)的升主动脉双尖瓣置换术后长期并发症的发生率,并确定该类患者的手术适应证。材料和方法。2007年至2014年间,有105名患者接受了BAV置换手术。患者被分为两组。组1包括63例狭窄患者,组2包括42例不全患者。术前和术后长期评估Valsalva鼻窦水平和升主动脉水平的主动脉直径。结果。86例(81.9%)患者的长期结果平均为6.8±2.2年。16例(18.6%)发生主动脉并发症,其中渐进性扩张6例(6.9%)(较初始直径扩大10%),检出动脉瘤形成8例(9.3%),夹层6例(6.9%),主动脉破裂1例(1.3%)。BAV置换术后13年内升主动脉扩张解除率,组1为95.1%,组2为62.3%。BAV置换术后13年内主动脉夹层自由率平均为90.1%(组1 97%,组2 80.6%)。BAV的主动脉瘤矫正策略取决于其直径,在较小程度上取决于瓣膜狭窄或不全的存在。存在狭窄且升主动脉直径达4.5 cm,可以考虑不干预升主动脉的矫正。在这种情况下瓣膜功能不全的存在通常需要对升主动脉进行额外的操作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
42
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊最新文献
Analysis of the Use of Non-Invasive Lung Ventilation Support in Newborns and Young Children after Cardiac Surgery Features of the Course of Atrial Fibrillation in Patients with the History of COVID-19: Impact on the Possibility and Tactics of Restoring Sinus Rhythm Features of Catheter Treatment of Non-Isthmus-Dependent Atrial Flutter Issues of Organization of the Cardiac Surgical Care in Ukraine under Martial Law Hemostasiological Aspects of PCI: Periprocedural Changes in the Activity of the Platelet Link of Hemocoagulation on the Background of Prior Double Antiplatelet Therapy in Patients with Chronic Coronary Syndrome
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1