Note on the Negative Approach of al-Shahīd al-Thānī Towards Logic in al-Iqtiṣād wa al-Irshād

IF 0.7 3区 哲学 Q3 HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE History and Philosophy of Logic Pub Date : 2022-12-21 DOI:10.1080/01445340.2022.2143219
Mahmood Zeraatpisheh
{"title":"Note on the Negative Approach of al-Shahīd al-Thānī Towards Logic in al-Iqtiṣād wa al-Irshād","authors":"Mahmood Zeraatpisheh","doi":"10.1080/01445340.2022.2143219","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aversion towards logic is a characteristic feature of the Islamic traditionalists. There is in fact a history of opposition to logic in Islam. As any other areas of history, here also the correct picture will not be achieved unless all of the pieces are put together. In what follows, I am going to shed light on a chapter written by Zayn al-Dīn al-ʿĀmilī (d. 966/1558), the Twelver Shīʿī Scholar better known as al-Shahīd al-Thānī. The chapter not only shows al-Shahīd al-Thānī’s negative stance towards logic, but also is important because it is a part of less studied Shīʿite traditionalists’ tendencies towards logic; those who are considered as the most influential figures in Iranian seminaries from the Safavid period up until today.","PeriodicalId":55053,"journal":{"name":"History and Philosophy of Logic","volume":"44 1","pages":"247 - 254"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"History and Philosophy of Logic","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/01445340.2022.2143219","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aversion towards logic is a characteristic feature of the Islamic traditionalists. There is in fact a history of opposition to logic in Islam. As any other areas of history, here also the correct picture will not be achieved unless all of the pieces are put together. In what follows, I am going to shed light on a chapter written by Zayn al-Dīn al-ʿĀmilī (d. 966/1558), the Twelver Shīʿī Scholar better known as al-Shahīd al-Thānī. The chapter not only shows al-Shahīd al-Thānī’s negative stance towards logic, but also is important because it is a part of less studied Shīʿite traditionalists’ tendencies towards logic; those who are considered as the most influential figures in Iranian seminaries from the Safavid period up until today.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
关于al- shah al-Thānī在al-Iqtiṣād wa al-Irshād中对逻辑的否定态度的注解
对逻辑的厌恶是伊斯兰传统主义者的一个特征。事实上,伊斯兰教有反对逻辑的历史。与历史上的任何其他领域一样,除非把所有的部分放在一起,否则这里也不会实现正确的画面。在接下来的文章中,我将介绍Zayn al-Dīn al-ʿĀmilī(公元966/1558年)写的一章,他是二十世纪的学者,也被称为al-ShahīD al-Thānī。这一章不仅展示了al-Shahīd al-Thānī对逻辑的否定立场,而且很重要,因为它是研究较少的什叶派传统主义者对逻辑倾向的一部分;从萨非王朝时期到今天,被认为是伊朗神学院中最具影响力的人物。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
History and Philosophy of Logic
History and Philosophy of Logic 综合性期刊-科学史与科学哲学
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
24
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: History and Philosophy of Logic contains articles, notes and book reviews dealing with the history and philosophy of logic. ’Logic’ is understood to be any volume of knowledge which was regarded as logic at the time in question. ’History’ refers back to ancient times and also to work in this century; however, the Editor will not accept articles, including review articles, on very recent work on a topic. ’Philosophy’ refers to broad and general questions: specialist articles which are now classed as ’philosophical logic’ will not be published. The Editor will consider articles on the relationship between logic and other branches of knowledge, but the component of logic must be substantial. Topics with no temporal specification are to be interpreted both historically and philosophically. Each topic includes its own metalogic where appropriate.
期刊最新文献
How Tarskian are Carnap's Semantics? Judgments vs Propositions in Alexander of Aphrodisias' Conception of Logic Buridan’s Theory of Consequences Following Bobzien: Some Notes on Frege's Development and Engagement with his Environment Denying Infinity: Pragmatism in Abraham Robinson’s Philosophy of Mathematics
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1