Effects of Seepage on Gas Loss through Shale Desorption during Shale Core Removal

IF 1.3 4区 工程技术 Q3 ENGINEERING, PETROLEUM SPE Drilling & Completion Pub Date : 2020-12-01 DOI:10.2118/204234-pa
Junbo He, Jiren Tang, Honglian Li, Jing Zhang, Qi Yao
{"title":"Effects of Seepage on Gas Loss through Shale Desorption during Shale Core Removal","authors":"Junbo He, Jiren Tang, Honglian Li, Jing Zhang, Qi Yao","doi":"10.2118/204234-pa","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n In the process of shale coring, the gas adsorption will increase the flow resistance of gas inside the core, which will inevitably affect the accuracy of shale gas loss. To clarify the underlying effects of seepage flow and related factors during shale desorption, we conducted an experimental study on the influence of methane on seepage resistance of fractured shale and matrix shale under different adsorption pressures. Changes in reservoir fluid and deformation resulting from CH4 saturation adsorption resulted in changes in shale permeability. This study investigated six adsorption durations (2, 4, 6, 12, 18, and 24 hours) under adsorption pressures of 5, 9, and 13 MPa in shale samples. During each cycle, different injection pressures (2 to 6 MPa) were applied, and seepage resistance of shale samples was measured by the transient method. The results showed that the permeation resistance of the sample decreased significantly after adsorption of CH4 reached saturation and decreased with increasing CH4 adsorption duration. Compared with matrix shale samples, fractured shale samples were shown to have more suitable pore microcracks and higher CH4 affinity. Therefore, fractured samples were found to have higher permeability resistance and higher adsorption capacity compared to matrix shale. The permeability flow of a sample had a negative exponential relationship with confining pressure, and stress sensitivity increased with increasing CH4 adsorption time. The model representing gas loss indicated a positive correlation between change in impermeability and the flow of escaped gas on the core surface. A significant reduction in the impermeability of the core will result in a significant reduction in shale gas loss.","PeriodicalId":51165,"journal":{"name":"SPE Drilling & Completion","volume":"1 1","pages":"1-16"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SPE Drilling & Completion","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/204234-pa","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, PETROLEUM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the process of shale coring, the gas adsorption will increase the flow resistance of gas inside the core, which will inevitably affect the accuracy of shale gas loss. To clarify the underlying effects of seepage flow and related factors during shale desorption, we conducted an experimental study on the influence of methane on seepage resistance of fractured shale and matrix shale under different adsorption pressures. Changes in reservoir fluid and deformation resulting from CH4 saturation adsorption resulted in changes in shale permeability. This study investigated six adsorption durations (2, 4, 6, 12, 18, and 24 hours) under adsorption pressures of 5, 9, and 13 MPa in shale samples. During each cycle, different injection pressures (2 to 6 MPa) were applied, and seepage resistance of shale samples was measured by the transient method. The results showed that the permeation resistance of the sample decreased significantly after adsorption of CH4 reached saturation and decreased with increasing CH4 adsorption duration. Compared with matrix shale samples, fractured shale samples were shown to have more suitable pore microcracks and higher CH4 affinity. Therefore, fractured samples were found to have higher permeability resistance and higher adsorption capacity compared to matrix shale. The permeability flow of a sample had a negative exponential relationship with confining pressure, and stress sensitivity increased with increasing CH4 adsorption time. The model representing gas loss indicated a positive correlation between change in impermeability and the flow of escaped gas on the core surface. A significant reduction in the impermeability of the core will result in a significant reduction in shale gas loss.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
页岩取心过程中渗流对页岩解吸气体损失的影响
在页岩取芯过程中,气体吸附会增加岩心内部气体的流动阻力,这必然会影响页岩气损失的准确性。为了阐明页岩解吸过程中渗流的潜在影响及其相关因素,我们对不同吸附压力下甲烷对裂缝页岩和基质页岩渗流阻力的影响进行了实验研究。储层流体的变化和CH4饱和吸附引起的变形导致页岩渗透率的变化。本研究调查了六个吸附持续时间(2、4、6、12、18和24 小时),在5、9和13的吸附压力下 页岩样品中的MPa。在每个循环中,不同的喷射压力(2至6 MPa),并通过瞬态法测量页岩样品的渗透阻力。结果表明,样品的渗透阻力在CH4吸附达到饱和后显著降低,并随着CH4吸附时间的增加而降低。与基质页岩样品相比,裂隙页岩样品具有更合适的孔隙微裂纹和更高的CH4亲和力。因此,与基质页岩相比,压裂样品具有更高的渗透阻力和更高的吸附能力。样品的渗透率流量与围压呈负指数关系,应力敏感性随CH4吸附时间的增加而增加。表示气体损失的模型表明,不渗透性的变化与岩心表面逸出气体的流动之间呈正相关。岩心不渗透性的显著降低将导致页岩气损失的显著减少。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
SPE Drilling & Completion
SPE Drilling & Completion 工程技术-工程:石油
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
7.10%
发文量
29
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Covers horizontal and directional drilling, drilling fluids, bit technology, sand control, perforating, cementing, well control, completions and drilling operations.
期刊最新文献
Combining Magnetic and Gyroscopic Surveys Provides the Best Possible Accuracy Applications of Machine Learning Methods to Predict Hole Cleaning in Horizontal and Highly Deviated Wells Experimental Investigation of Geopolymers for Application in High-Temperature and Geothermal Well Cementing Analysis of Riser Gas Pressure from Full-Scale Gas-in-Riser Experiments with Instrumentation Correlating Surface and Downhole Perforation Entry Hole Measurements Leads to Development of Improved Perforating Systems
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1