Online Health Information Seeking Behaviors and Infant Feeding Practices: A Social Cognitive Theory Perspective

Yexinyu Yang, K. Krupsky, Sarah Keim, R. McAdams, Kristin Roberts, Lara B McKenzie
{"title":"Online Health Information Seeking Behaviors and Infant Feeding Practices: A Social Cognitive Theory Perspective","authors":"Yexinyu Yang, K. Krupsky, Sarah Keim, R. McAdams, Kristin Roberts, Lara B McKenzie","doi":"10.4148/2572-1836.1102","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Breastfeeding benefits infants, but support is often needed to meet breastfeeding goals. Social media may help disseminate infant feeding information to caregivers. The relationship between parents’ health information-seeking behaviors (HISB) on social media and infant feeding practices remains understudied. Based on social cognitive theory (SCT), parents’ self-efficacy and outcome expectations are two potential factors for improving online HISB. We aimed to use SCT to describe associations between outcome expectations, self-efficacy (eHealth literacy), and online HISB across infant feeding groups among a nationally representative sample of U.S. parents. Eligible participants (N = 580) completed a cross-sectional online survey assessing infant feeding practices (never breastfed, only pumped, only fed-at-the-breast, and both pumped and fed-at-the-breast), self-efficacy (using eHealth literacy as a proxy), outcome expectations in online HISB, parents’ online HISB on social media, and demographic information. Survey weighted linear and logistic regression models were constructed. No online activities differed by infant feeding practices. Parents who pumped only had significantly lower eHealth literacy than parents who never breastfed (adjusted β = -2.63, 95% CI: -4.73, -0.53). Parents who used both methods had 1.78 times greater odds of considering online tools useful for making health-related decisions (95% CI: 0.96, 3.28) and 1.49 times greater odds of considering online tools important for accessing health information (95% Cl: 0.70, 3.15) than parents who never breastfed, though neither association was statistically significant. Understanding these associations between infant feeding practices and online HISB, as well as the two potential factors of parents’ self-efficacy and outcome expectations, may offer implications for tailoring online social media resources to promote breastfeeding outcomes. Abstract Breastfeeding benefits infants, but support is often needed to meet breastfeeding goals. Social media may help disseminate infant feeding information to caregivers. The relationship between parents’ health information-seeking behaviors (HISB) on social media and infant feeding practices remains understudied. Based on social cognitive theory (SCT), parents’ self-efficacy and outcome expectations are two potential factors for improving online HISB. We aimed to use SCT to describe associations between outcome expectations, self-efficacy (eHealth literacy), and online HISB across infant feeding groups among a nationally representative sample of U.S. parents. Eligible participants ( N = 580) completed a cross-sectional online survey assessing infant feeding practices (never breastfed, only pumped, only fed-at-the-breast, and both pumped and fed-at-the-breast), self-efficacy (using eHealth literacy as a proxy), outcome expectations in online HISB, parents’ online HISB on social media, and demographic information. Survey weighted linear and logistic regression models were constructed. No online activities differed by infant feeding practices. Parents who pumped only had significantly lower eHealth literacy than parents who never breastfed (adjusted β = -2.63, 95% CI: -4.73, -0.53). Parents who used both methods had 1.78 times greater odds of considering online tools useful for making health-related decisions (95% CI: 0.96, 3.28) and 1.49 times greater odds of considering online tools important for accessing health information (95% Cl: 0.70, 3.15) than parents who never breastfed, though neither association was statistically significant. Understanding these associations between infant feeding practices and online HISB, as well as the two potential factors of parents’ self-efficacy and outcome expectations, may offer implications for tailoring online social media resources to promote breastfeeding outcomes.","PeriodicalId":73205,"journal":{"name":"Health behavior research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health behavior research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4148/2572-1836.1102","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract Breastfeeding benefits infants, but support is often needed to meet breastfeeding goals. Social media may help disseminate infant feeding information to caregivers. The relationship between parents’ health information-seeking behaviors (HISB) on social media and infant feeding practices remains understudied. Based on social cognitive theory (SCT), parents’ self-efficacy and outcome expectations are two potential factors for improving online HISB. We aimed to use SCT to describe associations between outcome expectations, self-efficacy (eHealth literacy), and online HISB across infant feeding groups among a nationally representative sample of U.S. parents. Eligible participants (N = 580) completed a cross-sectional online survey assessing infant feeding practices (never breastfed, only pumped, only fed-at-the-breast, and both pumped and fed-at-the-breast), self-efficacy (using eHealth literacy as a proxy), outcome expectations in online HISB, parents’ online HISB on social media, and demographic information. Survey weighted linear and logistic regression models were constructed. No online activities differed by infant feeding practices. Parents who pumped only had significantly lower eHealth literacy than parents who never breastfed (adjusted β = -2.63, 95% CI: -4.73, -0.53). Parents who used both methods had 1.78 times greater odds of considering online tools useful for making health-related decisions (95% CI: 0.96, 3.28) and 1.49 times greater odds of considering online tools important for accessing health information (95% Cl: 0.70, 3.15) than parents who never breastfed, though neither association was statistically significant. Understanding these associations between infant feeding practices and online HISB, as well as the two potential factors of parents’ self-efficacy and outcome expectations, may offer implications for tailoring online social media resources to promote breastfeeding outcomes. Abstract Breastfeeding benefits infants, but support is often needed to meet breastfeeding goals. Social media may help disseminate infant feeding information to caregivers. The relationship between parents’ health information-seeking behaviors (HISB) on social media and infant feeding practices remains understudied. Based on social cognitive theory (SCT), parents’ self-efficacy and outcome expectations are two potential factors for improving online HISB. We aimed to use SCT to describe associations between outcome expectations, self-efficacy (eHealth literacy), and online HISB across infant feeding groups among a nationally representative sample of U.S. parents. Eligible participants ( N = 580) completed a cross-sectional online survey assessing infant feeding practices (never breastfed, only pumped, only fed-at-the-breast, and both pumped and fed-at-the-breast), self-efficacy (using eHealth literacy as a proxy), outcome expectations in online HISB, parents’ online HISB on social media, and demographic information. Survey weighted linear and logistic regression models were constructed. No online activities differed by infant feeding practices. Parents who pumped only had significantly lower eHealth literacy than parents who never breastfed (adjusted β = -2.63, 95% CI: -4.73, -0.53). Parents who used both methods had 1.78 times greater odds of considering online tools useful for making health-related decisions (95% CI: 0.96, 3.28) and 1.49 times greater odds of considering online tools important for accessing health information (95% Cl: 0.70, 3.15) than parents who never breastfed, though neither association was statistically significant. Understanding these associations between infant feeding practices and online HISB, as well as the two potential factors of parents’ self-efficacy and outcome expectations, may offer implications for tailoring online social media resources to promote breastfeeding outcomes.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在线健康信息寻求行为和婴儿喂养实践:一个社会认知理论的视角
母乳喂养对婴儿有益,但通常需要支持才能实现母乳喂养目标。社交媒体可能有助于向护理人员传播婴儿喂养信息。父母在社交媒体上的健康信息寻求行为(HISB)与婴儿喂养行为之间的关系尚未得到充分研究。基于社会认知理论(SCT),父母自我效能感和结果期望是改善在线HISB的两个潜在因素。我们的目的是使用SCT来描述结果预期、自我效能(电子健康素养)和在线HISB之间的关系,这些关系涉及美国父母的全国代表性样本中的婴儿喂养组。符合条件的参与者(N = 580)完成了一项横断面在线调查,评估婴儿喂养实践(从不母乳喂养、只吸吮、只母乳喂养、同时吸吮和母乳喂养)、自我效能感(使用电子健康素养作为代理)、在线HISB的结果预期、父母在社交媒体上的在线HISB以及人口统计信息。建立了调查加权线性和逻辑回归模型。网上活动没有因婴儿喂养方式而有所不同。仅母乳喂养的父母的电子健康素养明显低于从未母乳喂养的父母(调整后的β = -2.63, 95% CI: -4.73, -0.53)。使用这两种方法的父母认为在线工具对健康相关决策有用的几率是从未母乳喂养的父母的1.78倍(95%置信区间:0.96,3.28),认为在线工具对获取健康信息重要的几率是1.49倍(95%置信区间:0.70,3.15),尽管两者的关联在统计学上都不显著。了解婴儿喂养实践与在线HISB之间的这些关联,以及父母自我效能感和结果期望这两个潜在因素,可能为定制在线社交媒体资源以促进母乳喂养结果提供启示。母乳喂养对婴儿有益,但通常需要支持才能实现母乳喂养目标。社交媒体可能有助于向护理人员传播婴儿喂养信息。父母在社交媒体上的健康信息寻求行为(HISB)与婴儿喂养行为之间的关系尚未得到充分研究。基于社会认知理论(SCT),父母自我效能感和结果期望是改善在线HISB的两个潜在因素。我们的目的是使用SCT来描述结果预期、自我效能(电子健康素养)和在线HISB之间的关系,这些关系涉及美国父母的全国代表性样本中的婴儿喂养组。符合条件的参与者(N = 580)完成了一项横断面在线调查,评估婴儿喂养实践(从不母乳喂养、只吸吮、只母乳喂养、同时吸吮和母乳喂养)、自我效能感(使用电子健康素养作为代理)、在线HISB的结果预期、父母在社交媒体上的在线HISB以及人口统计信息。建立了调查加权线性和逻辑回归模型。网上活动没有因婴儿喂养方式而有所不同。仅母乳喂养的父母的电子健康素养明显低于从未母乳喂养的父母(调整后的β = -2.63, 95% CI: -4.73, -0.53)。使用这两种方法的父母认为在线工具对健康相关决策有用的几率是从未母乳喂养的父母的1.78倍(95%置信区间:0.96,3.28),认为在线工具对获取健康信息重要的几率是1.49倍(95%置信区间:0.70,3.15),尽管两者的关联在统计学上都不显著。了解婴儿喂养实践与在线HISB之间的这些关联,以及父母自我效能感和结果期望这两个潜在因素,可能为定制在线社交媒体资源以促进母乳喂养结果提供启示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
The American Academy of Health Behavior 2024 Annual Scientific Meeting: "Health Communication, (Mis-)Information, and Behavior: Leveraging Technology for Behavioral Interventions and Health Behavior Research" Sapere Aude — Dare to Be Wise: Robert J. McDermott Examining the Relationship between Health Literacy and Preventive Care Use A Longitudinal Examination of Multiple Forms of Stigma on Minority Stress, Belongingness, and Problematic Alcohol Use Associations of essential worker status, sex, lifestyle behaviors, and moods: Findings from a sample of working adults in the United States during the early stages of the COVID-19 pandemic
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1