Are macroeconomic factors adequate proxies for systematic influences in stock returns? A South African perspective

IF 1.2 4区 经济学 Q3 BUSINESS, FINANCE Investment Analysts Journal Pub Date : 2020-01-02 DOI:10.1080/10293523.2020.1723854
J. Szczygielski, Leon M. Brümmer, H. Wolmarans, Adam Zaremba
{"title":"Are macroeconomic factors adequate proxies for systematic influences in stock returns? A South African perspective","authors":"J. Szczygielski, Leon M. Brümmer, H. Wolmarans, Adam Zaremba","doi":"10.1080/10293523.2020.1723854","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT We investigate whether macroeconomic factors adequately proxy for systematic influences in stock returns within the South African context. We also investigate whether a commonly used solution to factor omission in macroeconomic factor models, the residual market factor, adequately reflects systematic influences not reflected by a set of macroeconomic factors. Our contribution lies in precisely quantifying the ability of macroeconomic and residual market factors to proxy for systematic drivers of returns. Systematic influences are represented by statistically derived factor scores which are then related to a set of carefully selected macroeconomic factors. We find that the identification of macroeconomic factors that proxy for systematic influences is a challenge in itself. Once identified, macroeconomic factors are poor and unstable proxies for systematic influences and the use of a residual market factor does not significantly improve the approximation of factor scores. Our conclusion is that macroeconomic linear factor models are likely to be underspecified, even if a residual market factor is included. This has implications for researchers, investors, econometricians and economists that rely on macroeconomic factor models to study financial markets.","PeriodicalId":44496,"journal":{"name":"Investment Analysts Journal","volume":"49 1","pages":"34 - 52"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10293523.2020.1723854","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Investment Analysts Journal","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10293523.2020.1723854","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

ABSTRACT We investigate whether macroeconomic factors adequately proxy for systematic influences in stock returns within the South African context. We also investigate whether a commonly used solution to factor omission in macroeconomic factor models, the residual market factor, adequately reflects systematic influences not reflected by a set of macroeconomic factors. Our contribution lies in precisely quantifying the ability of macroeconomic and residual market factors to proxy for systematic drivers of returns. Systematic influences are represented by statistically derived factor scores which are then related to a set of carefully selected macroeconomic factors. We find that the identification of macroeconomic factors that proxy for systematic influences is a challenge in itself. Once identified, macroeconomic factors are poor and unstable proxies for systematic influences and the use of a residual market factor does not significantly improve the approximation of factor scores. Our conclusion is that macroeconomic linear factor models are likely to be underspecified, even if a residual market factor is included. This has implications for researchers, investors, econometricians and economists that rely on macroeconomic factor models to study financial markets.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
宏观经济因素是否足以代表股票收益的系统性影响?南非的视角
摘要:我们调查了宏观经济因素是否足以代表南非背景下股票回报的系统性影响。我们还调查了宏观经济因素模型中常用的因素遗漏解决方案,即剩余市场因素,是否充分反映了一组宏观经济因素所没有反映的系统性影响。我们的贡献在于准确量化宏观经济和剩余市场因素代表系统回报驱动因素的能力。系统影响由统计得出的因素得分表示,然后将其与一组精心选择的宏观经济因素相关联。我们发现,识别代表系统性影响的宏观经济因素本身就是一个挑战。一旦确定,宏观经济因素是系统影响的较差和不稳定的指标,剩余市场因素的使用不会显著改善因素得分的近似值。我们的结论是,即使包括剩余市场因素,宏观经济线性因素模型也可能被低估。这对依赖宏观经济因素模型研究金融市场的研究人员、投资者、计量经济学家和经济学家都有影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Investment Analysts Journal
Investment Analysts Journal BUSINESS, FINANCE-
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
11.10%
发文量
22
期刊介绍: The Investment Analysts Journal is an international, peer-reviewed journal, publishing high-quality, original research three times a year. The journal publishes significant new research in finance and investments and seeks to establish a balance between theoretical and empirical studies. Papers written in any areas of finance, investment, accounting and economics will be considered for publication. All contributions are welcome but are subject to an objective selection procedure to ensure that published articles answer the criteria of scientific objectivity, importance and replicability. Readability and good writing style are important. No articles which have been published or are under review elsewhere will be considered. All submitted manuscripts are subject to initial appraisal by the Editor, and, if found suitable for further consideration, to peer review by independent, anonymous expert referees. All peer review is double blind and submission is via email. Accepted papers will then pass through originality checking software. The editors reserve the right to make the final decision with respect to publication.
期刊最新文献
Employing behavioural portfolio theory for sustainable investment: Examining drawdown risks and ESG factors The spillover and leverage effects and trading volume of FinTech Exchange-Traded Funds Risk spillovers among global oil & gas firms The time-frequency-quantile causal impact of Cable News-based Economic Policy Uncertainty on major assets returns Momentum trading: How it differs among investor segments
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1