Toward Metaliteracy and Transliteracy in the History Classroom: A Case Study Among Underserved Students

Q3 Arts and Humanities American Archivist Pub Date : 2022-09-01 DOI:10.17723/2327-9702-85.2.587
Alston Cobourn, J. Brown, Ed Warga, Lisa Louis
{"title":"Toward Metaliteracy and Transliteracy in the History Classroom: A Case Study Among Underserved Students","authors":"Alston Cobourn, J. Brown, Ed Warga, Lisa Louis","doi":"10.17723/2327-9702-85.2.587","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n In the last twenty years, scholars have reimagined information literacy to better address an overly saturated world of information and the growing participatory culture of Web 2.0. Outside of library and information science (LIS), researchers have promoted transliteracy—the intersection between information, visual, digital, and other literacies—to help students find and assess information. Within the LIS discipline, metaliteracy has provided a foundation to rethink information literacy frameworks, redefining students as creators who produce and share information. Relatively few studies exist, however, on how to leverage literacies in support of student digital scholarship projects. Likewise, digital humanities professors promote metaliteracy in the classroom, yet fewer scholars create digital humanities projects or write case studies about them outside of research institutions, prestigious private colleges, and larger, well-established public history programs. This case study examines a class project for a small undergraduate Introduction to Public History course at Texas A&M University–Corpus Christi (TAMU–CC), a regional university with a comparatively large population of historically underserved students. Working with one archivist, two librarians, and the professor, students established a digital home for the ongoing South Texas Stories oral history project. Through this project, students learned and practiced various aspects of primary source literacy, information literacy, visual literacy, and digital literacy. The authors argue that such digital projects promote both metaliteracy and transliteracy, offering students a holistic learning experience during which they can practice their skills and that these types of projects are feasible at all kinds of institutions, even those with largely historically underserved populations.","PeriodicalId":39979,"journal":{"name":"American Archivist","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Archivist","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17723/2327-9702-85.2.587","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the last twenty years, scholars have reimagined information literacy to better address an overly saturated world of information and the growing participatory culture of Web 2.0. Outside of library and information science (LIS), researchers have promoted transliteracy—the intersection between information, visual, digital, and other literacies—to help students find and assess information. Within the LIS discipline, metaliteracy has provided a foundation to rethink information literacy frameworks, redefining students as creators who produce and share information. Relatively few studies exist, however, on how to leverage literacies in support of student digital scholarship projects. Likewise, digital humanities professors promote metaliteracy in the classroom, yet fewer scholars create digital humanities projects or write case studies about them outside of research institutions, prestigious private colleges, and larger, well-established public history programs. This case study examines a class project for a small undergraduate Introduction to Public History course at Texas A&M University–Corpus Christi (TAMU–CC), a regional university with a comparatively large population of historically underserved students. Working with one archivist, two librarians, and the professor, students established a digital home for the ongoing South Texas Stories oral history project. Through this project, students learned and practiced various aspects of primary source literacy, information literacy, visual literacy, and digital literacy. The authors argue that such digital projects promote both metaliteracy and transliteracy, offering students a holistic learning experience during which they can practice their skills and that these types of projects are feasible at all kinds of institutions, even those with largely historically underserved populations.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
历史课堂中的元文学与翻译——以服务不足学生为例
在过去的二十年里,学者们重新构想了信息素养,以更好地应对过度饱和的信息世界和日益增长的Web2.0参与文化。在图书馆和信息科学(LIS)之外,研究人员提倡跨文化——信息、视觉、数字和其他文学之间的交叉——以帮助学生发现和评估信息。在LIS学科中,元文学为重新思考信息素养框架提供了基础,将学生重新定义为生产和共享信息的创造者。然而,关于如何利用文字支持学生数字奖学金项目的研究相对较少。同样,数字人文学科教授在课堂上提倡元文学,但在研究机构、著名的私立大学和更大、更完善的公共历史项目之外,创建数字人文学科项目或撰写案例研究的学者更少。本案例研究考察了德克萨斯农工大学-科珀斯克里斯蒂分校(TAMU–CC)的一个小型本科生公共历史导论课程的课堂项目,该校是一所地区性大学,历史上学生人数相对较多,服务不足。学生们与一名档案管理员、两名图书馆员和一名教授合作,为正在进行的《南得克萨斯故事》口述历史项目建立了一个数字家园。通过这个项目,学生们学习并实践了初级源识字、信息识字、视觉识字和数字识字的各个方面。作者认为,这些数字项目既促进了元文学,又促进了跨文化,为学生提供了一种全面的学习体验,在这种体验中,他们可以练习自己的技能,而且这些类型的项目在各种机构都是可行的,即使是那些历史上服务不足的机构。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
American Archivist
American Archivist Social Sciences-Library and Information Sciences
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
期刊最新文献
College and University Archivists: Doing It All for Less Building a Baseline of Archival Data with A*CENSUS II “Sometimes I feel like they hate us”: The Society of American Archivists and Graduate Archival Education in the Twenty-first Century Rescued from Oblivion: Historical Cultures in the Early United States What Primary Sources Teach: Lessons for Every Classroom
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1