Planned Home Birth as a Safe Alternative to Hospital Birth for Low-Risk Women: A Systematic Review

Muhammed A., L. K., Saidappa S.M, Shariff-Ghazali S., Ibrahim A.H.
{"title":"Planned Home Birth as a Safe Alternative to Hospital Birth for Low-Risk Women: A Systematic Review","authors":"Muhammed A., L. K., Saidappa S.M, Shariff-Ghazali S., Ibrahim A.H.","doi":"10.52589/ajhnm-dnq6bnpk","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Home birth is a widely practised norm among women in most developing countries. Studies continue to evaluate the safety of planned home birth (PHB) for low-risk women in high-income countries. However, such studies are scarce in Africa and other developing countries. The study examined PHB as a safe alternative to planned hospital birth for low-risk women. An electronic search was carried out on databases such as Medline database, Cochrane, Google Scholar, PubMed, and CINAHL to identify studies published in English from January 2007 to December 2017. A Meta-analytic study, systematic reviews, and observational (prospective and retrospective) studies were included in the literature reviews. The studies were analyzed using descriptive and narrative synthesis. The strength and or limitations of each study were assessed. Sixteen eligible articles were finally reviewed. PHB is equally safe in terms of complication (especially postpartum haemorrhage) compared to planned hospital birth. PHB would have a similar outcome in reducing maternal death for low-risk women if compared with planned hospital birth. Although neonatal asphyxia is mixed across studies, PHB is associated with a similarly low rate of neonatal intensive care unit admission. It was also indicated that there was no increase in neonatal mortality for PHB, especially for parous women. PHB compared to the hospital is associated with a similar low risk of maternal complications, maternal deaths, newborn complications, and newborn deaths, especially for parous women. Therefore, PHB is a safe alternative to hospital birth for low-risk women. While studies that are more recent are required to evaluate its feasibility and safety in developing countries, PHB (if properly attended) may reduce maternal and newborn complications and death associated with unplanned home births.","PeriodicalId":93406,"journal":{"name":"African journal of health, nursing and midwifery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"African journal of health, nursing and midwifery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52589/ajhnm-dnq6bnpk","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Home birth is a widely practised norm among women in most developing countries. Studies continue to evaluate the safety of planned home birth (PHB) for low-risk women in high-income countries. However, such studies are scarce in Africa and other developing countries. The study examined PHB as a safe alternative to planned hospital birth for low-risk women. An electronic search was carried out on databases such as Medline database, Cochrane, Google Scholar, PubMed, and CINAHL to identify studies published in English from January 2007 to December 2017. A Meta-analytic study, systematic reviews, and observational (prospective and retrospective) studies were included in the literature reviews. The studies were analyzed using descriptive and narrative synthesis. The strength and or limitations of each study were assessed. Sixteen eligible articles were finally reviewed. PHB is equally safe in terms of complication (especially postpartum haemorrhage) compared to planned hospital birth. PHB would have a similar outcome in reducing maternal death for low-risk women if compared with planned hospital birth. Although neonatal asphyxia is mixed across studies, PHB is associated with a similarly low rate of neonatal intensive care unit admission. It was also indicated that there was no increase in neonatal mortality for PHB, especially for parous women. PHB compared to the hospital is associated with a similar low risk of maternal complications, maternal deaths, newborn complications, and newborn deaths, especially for parous women. Therefore, PHB is a safe alternative to hospital birth for low-risk women. While studies that are more recent are required to evaluate its feasibility and safety in developing countries, PHB (if properly attended) may reduce maternal and newborn complications and death associated with unplanned home births.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
计划家庭分娩作为低风险妇女医院分娩的安全选择:一项系统综述
在家分娩是大多数发展中国家妇女普遍实行的一种规范。研究继续评估高收入国家低风险妇女计划在家分娩的安全性。然而,这类研究在非洲和其他发展中国家很少。该研究检验了PHB作为低风险妇女计划住院分娩的安全选择。对Medline数据库、Cochrane、谷歌Scholar、PubMed和CINAHL等数据库进行电子检索,以确定2007年1月至2017年12月期间发表的英文研究。文献综述包括meta分析研究、系统综述和观察性(前瞻性和回顾性)研究。研究采用描述性和叙述性综合分析。评估每项研究的优势和/或局限性。最终审查了16篇符合条件的文章。与计划住院分娩相比,PHB在并发症(尤其是产后出血)方面同样安全。与有计划的住院分娩相比,PHB在降低低风险妇女的孕产妇死亡率方面具有类似的结果。尽管新生儿窒息在不同的研究中存在差异,但PHB与同样低的新生儿重症监护病房入院率相关。研究还表明,PHB的新生儿死亡率没有增加,特别是对分娩妇女。与医院相比,PHB与产妇并发症、产妇死亡、新生儿并发症和新生儿死亡的风险同样较低有关,特别是对产妇而言。因此,对于低风险妇女来说,PHB是医院分娩的安全选择。虽然需要最近的研究来评估其在发展中国家的可行性和安全性,但PHB(如果得到适当的护理)可能会减少与计划外家庭分娩相关的孕产妇和新生儿并发症和死亡。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Tobacco Behavior, Attitude, Knowledge and Cessation among a Vulnerable Nigerian Population Who Smoke Knowledge and Uptake of Community-Based Healthcare Financing in Management of Non-Communicable Diseases among Community Members in Anambra State, Nigeria Determinants of Job Stress Among Nurse Educators in Departments of Nursing Science of Universities in South East Nigeria Knowledge of Oxygen Therapy among Nurses in a Tertiary Hospital in Kenya: Implications for Patient Care and Training Needs Lived Experiences of Mothers With/Without Post Dural Puncture Headache and its Effects on Early Initiation of Breastfeeding at Federal Medical Centre, Abeokuta, Nigeria
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1