Banking Competition Measurement and Banking Sector Performance: Analysis of 4 ASEAN Countries

Signifikan Pub Date : 2017-02-11 DOI:10.15408/SJIE.V6I1.4547
Buddi Wibowo
{"title":"Banking Competition Measurement and Banking Sector Performance: Analysis of 4 ASEAN Countries","authors":"Buddi Wibowo","doi":"10.15408/SJIE.V6I1.4547","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Many believe concentrated  banking industry which is dominated by few  big banks creates lower  competition, high profitability, and low efficiency. The main issue in empirical testing of this hypothesis is how to measure banking competition level. Traditional measures of competition are  concentration ratio and Herfindahl-Hirschman Index. This study uses three measures of banking level competition which are widely used in recent  financial literature: Boone Indicator, Lerner Index and H-Panzar-Rosse  statistics.  Lerner Index and H-Panzar-Rosse statistics resulted a similar competition level conclusion, while Boone Indicator produced slightly different output. Industry concentration produced opposing results with those three level of industry competition measurement methods. The results show  banking competition tend to be a monopolistic competition in ASEAN countries, especially in Indonesia which banks’ strategy basically were non-pricing strategy. Competition significantly caused lower profitability, while banking efficiency was not significantly affected by level of competition. DOI: 10.15408/sjie.v6i1.4547","PeriodicalId":31086,"journal":{"name":"Signifikan","volume":"6 1","pages":"1-28"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-02-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Signifikan","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15408/SJIE.V6I1.4547","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Many believe concentrated  banking industry which is dominated by few  big banks creates lower  competition, high profitability, and low efficiency. The main issue in empirical testing of this hypothesis is how to measure banking competition level. Traditional measures of competition are  concentration ratio and Herfindahl-Hirschman Index. This study uses three measures of banking level competition which are widely used in recent  financial literature: Boone Indicator, Lerner Index and H-Panzar-Rosse  statistics.  Lerner Index and H-Panzar-Rosse statistics resulted a similar competition level conclusion, while Boone Indicator produced slightly different output. Industry concentration produced opposing results with those three level of industry competition measurement methods. The results show  banking competition tend to be a monopolistic competition in ASEAN countries, especially in Indonesia which banks’ strategy basically were non-pricing strategy. Competition significantly caused lower profitability, while banking efficiency was not significantly affected by level of competition. DOI: 10.15408/sjie.v6i1.4547
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
银行业竞争测度与银行业绩效——对东盟4个国家的分析
许多人认为,由少数几家大银行主导的集中银行业会降低竞争,提高盈利能力,降低效率。对这一假设进行实证检验的主要问题是如何衡量银行业的竞争水平。传统的竞争衡量标准是集中度和赫芬达尔-赫希曼指数。本研究使用了最近金融文献中广泛使用的三种银行层面竞争指标:Boone指标、Lerner指数和H-Panzar-Rosse统计。Lerner指数和H-Panzar-Rosse统计得出了类似的竞争水平结论,而Boone指标产生的产出略有不同。产业集中度与这三种水平的产业竞争测度方法产生了相反的结果。研究结果表明,东盟国家的银行业竞争往往是垄断性竞争,尤其是印尼,银行业的战略基本上是非定价战略。竞争显著降低了银行的盈利能力,而银行效率不受竞争水平的显著影响。DOI:10.15408/jie.v6i1.4547
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
30
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Socioeconomic and Demographic Causes of Crime Reporting in Indonesia Untapped Potential of Manufacturing MSEs in Bali Amidst the Covid-19 Pandemic Determinants of Indonesian Sugar Import The Effect of Environmental Tax - Spending Mix on Province Air Quality Impacts of Covid-19 Pandemics and Wealth on Household Consumption in Java Island
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1