Assaulting ‘diversity as such’: The ontology of dehumanisation in mass violence

IF 2.5 Q1 INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS European Journal of International Security Pub Date : 2022-12-02 DOI:10.1017/eis.2022.33
T. Michel
{"title":"Assaulting ‘diversity as such’: The ontology of dehumanisation in mass violence","authors":"T. Michel","doi":"10.1017/eis.2022.33","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Dehumanisation is one of the most invoked factors in analyses of mass atrocities with many scholars focusing on its crucial role in enabling perpetrators to inflict violence on their victims. However, while its application is widespread, its relevance is often assumed a priori, with claims regarding its empirical relevance often asserted rather than argued for. Not only does its meaning, nature, and function remain amorphous, current scholarship also lacks a general conceptualisation of the basic features that bind the manifold appearances of dehumanisation together. It is this paucity of sustained reflection and particularly the lack of conceptual clarity that the present article seeks to address. Drawing on the work of Hannah Arendt, it aims to deliver a more thoroughgoing appraisal of the nature of dehumanisation as a fundamental violation of plurality to conceptually consolidate and ground its meaning and bind together its diverse manifestations across cases of mass violence.","PeriodicalId":44394,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of International Security","volume":"8 1","pages":"281 - 298"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of International Security","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/eis.2022.33","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Dehumanisation is one of the most invoked factors in analyses of mass atrocities with many scholars focusing on its crucial role in enabling perpetrators to inflict violence on their victims. However, while its application is widespread, its relevance is often assumed a priori, with claims regarding its empirical relevance often asserted rather than argued for. Not only does its meaning, nature, and function remain amorphous, current scholarship also lacks a general conceptualisation of the basic features that bind the manifold appearances of dehumanisation together. It is this paucity of sustained reflection and particularly the lack of conceptual clarity that the present article seeks to address. Drawing on the work of Hannah Arendt, it aims to deliver a more thoroughgoing appraisal of the nature of dehumanisation as a fundamental violation of plurality to conceptually consolidate and ground its meaning and bind together its diverse manifestations across cases of mass violence.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
攻击“多样性”:大规模暴力中非人化的本体论
摘要在分析大规模暴行时,去人性化是最容易被引用的因素之一,许多学者都关注它在使施暴者能够对受害者施加暴力方面的关键作用。然而,尽管它的应用很广泛,但它的相关性往往是先验的,关于它的经验相关性的说法往往是断言而非论证的。它的含义、性质和功能仍然是无定形的,目前的学术界还缺乏将非人化的多种表现联系在一起的基本特征的一般概念化。本条试图解决的正是这种缺乏持续反思的问题,特别是缺乏概念上的明确性。它借鉴了汉娜·阿伦特的作品,旨在对非人化的本质进行更彻底的评估,将其视为对多元性的根本侵犯,以在概念上巩固和巩固其意义,并将其在大规模暴力案件中的不同表现结合在一起。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
13.60%
发文量
30
期刊最新文献
Transcending the fog of war? US military ‘AI’, vision, and the emergent post-scopic regime Anything you can do [I can do better]: Exploring women’s agency and gendered protection in state militaries Timing bombs and the temporal dynamics of Iranian nuclear security Cyberbiosecurity in the new normal: Cyberbio risks, pre-emptive security, and the global governance of bioinformation The military-strategic rationality of hybrid warfare: Everyday total defence under strategic non-peace in the case of Sweden
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1