Scarcity in COVID‐19 vaccine supplies reduces perceived vaccination priority and increases vaccine hesitancy

IF 9.1 2区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS Psychology & Marketing Pub Date : 2021-12-16 DOI:10.1002/mar.21629
Beatriz Pereira, Amy Greiner Fehl, Stacey R. Finkelstein, G. Jiga‐Boy, Marta Caserotti
{"title":"Scarcity in COVID‐19 vaccine supplies reduces perceived vaccination priority and increases vaccine hesitancy","authors":"Beatriz Pereira, Amy Greiner Fehl, Stacey R. Finkelstein, G. Jiga‐Boy, Marta Caserotti","doi":"10.1002/mar.21629","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In two experimental studies, we tested the effect of COVID-19 vaccine scarcity on vaccine hesitancy. Based on extensive scarcity literature, we initially predicted that high (vs. low) scarcity would increase demand for vaccines, operationalized as one's willingness to receive a vaccine. Contrary to this prediction, Study 1 showed that scarcity of vaccines reduced participants' sense of priority which, in turn, also reduced their vaccination intentions. Trust in doctors moderated the effect of perceived vaccination priority on vaccination intentions such that for individuals with high trust in doctors, reduced perceived priority did not reduce their vaccination intentions as much. Study 2 replicated these effects with a more general population sample, which included at-risk individuals for COVID-19 complications. At-risk participants (vs. low-risk) had higher perceived vaccination priority, but describing vaccine doses as scarce reduced vaccination intentions similarly across both groups. Moreover, Study 2 demonstrated that compassion for others is a boundary condition of the effect of vaccine scarcity on vaccination intentions. For participants with high compassion, scarcity reduces willingness to receive a vaccine;for participants with low compassion, scarcity increases their willingness to be vaccinated. Our results suggest that health policymakers need to deemphasize the scarcity of vaccines to increase vaccine acceptance.","PeriodicalId":48373,"journal":{"name":"Psychology & Marketing","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"13","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychology & Marketing","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.21629","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13

Abstract

In two experimental studies, we tested the effect of COVID-19 vaccine scarcity on vaccine hesitancy. Based on extensive scarcity literature, we initially predicted that high (vs. low) scarcity would increase demand for vaccines, operationalized as one's willingness to receive a vaccine. Contrary to this prediction, Study 1 showed that scarcity of vaccines reduced participants' sense of priority which, in turn, also reduced their vaccination intentions. Trust in doctors moderated the effect of perceived vaccination priority on vaccination intentions such that for individuals with high trust in doctors, reduced perceived priority did not reduce their vaccination intentions as much. Study 2 replicated these effects with a more general population sample, which included at-risk individuals for COVID-19 complications. At-risk participants (vs. low-risk) had higher perceived vaccination priority, but describing vaccine doses as scarce reduced vaccination intentions similarly across both groups. Moreover, Study 2 demonstrated that compassion for others is a boundary condition of the effect of vaccine scarcity on vaccination intentions. For participants with high compassion, scarcity reduces willingness to receive a vaccine;for participants with low compassion, scarcity increases their willingness to be vaccinated. Our results suggest that health policymakers need to deemphasize the scarcity of vaccines to increase vaccine acceptance.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
COVID - 19疫苗供应短缺降低了人们对疫苗接种优先级的认识,并增加了对疫苗的犹豫
在两项实验研究中,我们测试了新冠肺炎疫苗稀缺对疫苗犹豫的影响。根据广泛的稀缺性文献,我们最初预测,高(与低)稀缺性将增加对疫苗的需求,具体表现为一个人接种疫苗的意愿。与这一预测相反,研究1表明,疫苗的稀缺降低了参与者的优先感,这反过来也降低了他们的疫苗接种意愿。对医生的信任调节了感知的疫苗接种优先级对疫苗接种意愿的影响,因此对于对医生高度信任的个人来说,感知的优先级降低并不会降低他们的疫苗接种意愿。研究2在更普通的人群样本中复制了这些影响,其中包括新冠肺炎并发症的高危人群。高危参与者(与低风险参与者相比)有更高的疫苗接种优先级,但将疫苗剂量描述为稀缺,这两组的疫苗接种意愿相似。此外,研究2表明,对他人的同情是疫苗稀缺对疫苗接种意愿影响的边界条件。对于具有高度同情心的参与者来说,稀缺性降低了接种疫苗的意愿;对于缺乏同情心的参与者来说,稀缺性增加了他们接种疫苗的意愿。我们的研究结果表明,卫生政策制定者需要淡化疫苗的稀缺性,以提高疫苗的接受度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
12.10
自引率
20.90%
发文量
127
期刊介绍: Psychology & Marketing (P&M) publishes original research and review articles dealing with the application of psychological theories and techniques to marketing. As an interdisciplinary journal, P&M serves practitioners and academicians in the fields of psychology and marketing and is an appropriate outlet for articles designed to be of interest, concern, and applied value to its audience of scholars and professionals. Manuscripts that use psychological theory to better understand the various aspects of the marketing of products and services are appropriate for submission.
期刊最新文献
The bittersweet of consumer–human brand relationships in the social media context Eliminating customer experience pain points in complex customer journeys through smart service solutions The purity premium effect: The asymmetrical value change around pure products When “good enough” is not good enough: How maximizing benefits financial well‐being Beyond humans: Consumer reluctance to adopt zoonotic artificial intelligence
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1