Infrastructures of Aging: Form and Institutional Care in Dementia Fiction

IF 0.8 3区 文学 0 LITERATURE POETICS TODAY Pub Date : 2023-06-01 DOI:10.1215/03335372-10342057
Pieter Vermeulen
{"title":"Infrastructures of Aging: Form and Institutional Care in Dementia Fiction","authors":"Pieter Vermeulen","doi":"10.1215/03335372-10342057","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n The fictional representation of the cognitive experience of people with dementia is often credited with providing an occasion for readerly empathy and a privileged mimetic account of dementia experience. This essay draws on recent scholarship by Caroline Levine and Anna Kornbluh that expands the notion of form to include infrastructures, institutions, and other entities that provide sustenance and continuity to offer a different account of the cultural work such fictions do. The essay argues that two canonical works of fiction about dementia— J. Bernlef's Out of Mind and B. S. Johnson's House Mother Normal—do not merely offer a mimesis of dementia experience (the focus of existing research). These works take seriously dementia experience's challenge to formal coherence as they (however ambivalently) displace the task of providing continuity and sustenance to caring institutions rather than to residual ratiocinative capacities. Both novels repurpose the ellipses and blanks that are typical of the representation of dementia “mind styles” for something other than an indication of deficient subjectivity: in Bernlef, they become an indicator of lyrical and timeless sustenance and suspension; in Johnson, they point to regularities that invite the reader to coconstruct an imaginative space that sustains the lives the novel evokes.","PeriodicalId":46669,"journal":{"name":"POETICS TODAY","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"POETICS TODAY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1215/03335372-10342057","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The fictional representation of the cognitive experience of people with dementia is often credited with providing an occasion for readerly empathy and a privileged mimetic account of dementia experience. This essay draws on recent scholarship by Caroline Levine and Anna Kornbluh that expands the notion of form to include infrastructures, institutions, and other entities that provide sustenance and continuity to offer a different account of the cultural work such fictions do. The essay argues that two canonical works of fiction about dementia— J. Bernlef's Out of Mind and B. S. Johnson's House Mother Normal—do not merely offer a mimesis of dementia experience (the focus of existing research). These works take seriously dementia experience's challenge to formal coherence as they (however ambivalently) displace the task of providing continuity and sustenance to caring institutions rather than to residual ratiocinative capacities. Both novels repurpose the ellipses and blanks that are typical of the representation of dementia “mind styles” for something other than an indication of deficient subjectivity: in Bernlef, they become an indicator of lyrical and timeless sustenance and suspension; in Johnson, they point to regularities that invite the reader to coconstruct an imaginative space that sustains the lives the novel evokes.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
衰老的基础结构:痴呆小说中的形式与制度关怀
痴呆症患者认知体验的虚构表现通常被认为提供了一个现成的同理心和对痴呆症体验的特权模仿描述的机会。这篇文章借鉴了卡罗琳·莱文和安娜·科恩布鲁最近的学术成果,将形式的概念扩展到包括基础设施、机构和其他提供支撑和连续性的实体,以提供对此类小说所做文化工作的不同描述。约翰逊的《正常妈妈》不仅仅是对痴呆症经历的模仿(现有研究的重点)。这些作品认真对待痴呆症经历对形式连贯性的挑战,因为它们(无论多么矛盾)取代了为护理机构提供连续性和维持的任务,而不是剩余的推理能力。这两部小说都将痴呆症“思维风格”的典型代表省略号和空格重新用于其他方面,而不是主观性不足的表现:在《伯恩勒夫》中,它们成为抒情和永恒的寄托和暂停的指标;在《约翰逊》中,他们指出了一些规律,这些规律邀请读者共同构建一个想象空间,维持小说唤起的生活。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
POETICS TODAY
POETICS TODAY LITERATURE-
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
20.00%
发文量
31
期刊介绍: International Journal for Theory and Analysis of Literature and Communication Poetics Today brings together scholars from throughout the world who are concerned with developing systematic approaches to the study of literature (e.g., semiotics and narratology) and with applying such approaches to the interpretation of literary works. Poetics Today presents a remarkable diversity of methodologies and examines a wide range of literary and critical topics. Several thematic review sections or special issues are published in each volume, and each issue contains a book review section, with article-length review essays.
期刊最新文献
Visual Hybrids and Nonconceptual Aesthetic Perception Visual Metaphors: On the Linguistic Structure of Hybrid Creatures in Art L'idée de la littérature. De l'art pour l'art aux écritures d'intervention Hybridity and the Unifying Space of Painting: Larry Abramson in Conversation with Theolonius Marx Magical Monsters: Hybrids and Witchcraft in Early Modern Art
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1