No Asylum from Her Majesty: The British FCO and Complicity with Apartheid

IF 0.4 3区 历史学 Q1 HISTORY South African Historical Journal Pub Date : 2021-10-02 DOI:10.1080/02582473.2022.2031264
Billy Keniston
{"title":"No Asylum from Her Majesty: The British FCO and Complicity with Apartheid","authors":"Billy Keniston","doi":"10.1080/02582473.2022.2031264","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Jeanette and Katryn Schoon were assassinated on 28 June 1984, the victims of a parcel bomb sent to Angola by the apartheid state's security services. To understand the state's decision to assassinate the Schoons, it is necessary to look back to the Schoons' time in Botswana, where they were members of the African National Congress (ANC)'s exile structures for six years, from 1977 to 1983. I argue that the Schoons’ forced departure from Botswana in 1983 was profoundly influenced by the British government, working in support of the apartheid state. Furthermore, I argue that the UK’s complicity in this instance placed the Schoons in an unnecessarily precarious position. Without recourse to asylum in the UK, the Schoons were forced to seek refuge in a nation locked in an extended armed conflict with South Africa, and they were therefore within striking range of the apartheid state’s security forces. It seems the notion that the Schoons might end up somewhere even less safe than Botswana did not enter the equation for the British Foreign and Commonwealth Office (FCO). Their only real concern was to get the Schoons away from the precious citizens of the United Kingdom.","PeriodicalId":45116,"journal":{"name":"South African Historical Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"South African Historical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02582473.2022.2031264","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT Jeanette and Katryn Schoon were assassinated on 28 June 1984, the victims of a parcel bomb sent to Angola by the apartheid state's security services. To understand the state's decision to assassinate the Schoons, it is necessary to look back to the Schoons' time in Botswana, where they were members of the African National Congress (ANC)'s exile structures for six years, from 1977 to 1983. I argue that the Schoons’ forced departure from Botswana in 1983 was profoundly influenced by the British government, working in support of the apartheid state. Furthermore, I argue that the UK’s complicity in this instance placed the Schoons in an unnecessarily precarious position. Without recourse to asylum in the UK, the Schoons were forced to seek refuge in a nation locked in an extended armed conflict with South Africa, and they were therefore within striking range of the apartheid state’s security forces. It seems the notion that the Schoons might end up somewhere even less safe than Botswana did not enter the equation for the British Foreign and Commonwealth Office (FCO). Their only real concern was to get the Schoons away from the precious citizens of the United Kingdom.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
女王陛下没有庇护:英国FCO与种族隔离的同谋
1984年6月28日,Jeanette Schoon和Katryn Schoon被这个种族隔离国家的安全部门寄往安哥拉的包裹炸弹炸死。为了理解政府暗杀斯库恩夫妇的决定,有必要回顾一下斯库恩夫妇在博茨瓦纳的生活,从1977年到1983年,他们是非洲人国民大会(ANC)流亡组织的成员,在那里呆了六年。我认为,斯库恩夫妇1983年被迫离开博茨瓦纳是受到英国政府的深刻影响,因为英国政府支持这个种族隔离国家。此外,我认为,英国在这件事上的共谋,使商学院处于不必要的危险境地。由于无法在英国寻求庇护,Schoons一家被迫在一个与南非陷入长期武装冲突的国家寻求庇护,因此他们处于这个种族隔离国家安全部队的打击范围之内。英国外交和联邦事务部(Foreign and Commonwealth Office,简称FCO)似乎并没有考虑到Schoons一家可能会在比博茨瓦纳更不安全的地方落脚。他们唯一真正关心的是让学校远离英国宝贵的公民。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
37
期刊介绍: Over the past 40 years, the South African Historical Journal has become renowned and internationally regarded as a premier history journal published in South Africa, promoting significant historical scholarship on the country as well as the southern African region. The journal, which is linked to the Southern African Historical Society, has provided a high-quality medium for original thinking about South African history and has thus shaped - and continues to contribute towards defining - the historiography of the region.
期刊最新文献
The Internal Settlement and Zimbabwe-Rhodesia in Patriotic Front Propaganda Positioning in Turbulent Times: Ottoman Intellectuals and the South African War (1899–1902) German ‘enemy aliens’ in internment camps in South Africa in the Second World War On Life History and Network Analysis: A Global Environmental Historian in South Africa The Klip River Affair in Zulu Policy, 1846–1847
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1