Social Clinics and Analytic Boundaries

Pub Date : 2022-12-01 DOI:10.3366/pah.2022.0444
I. Ward
{"title":"Social Clinics and Analytic Boundaries","authors":"I. Ward","doi":"10.3366/pah.2022.0444","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this reflection the author makes connections between the themes of the special issue and an early series of seminars held at the Freud Museum London, in 1992, ‘Psychotherapy Black and White’, organized in cooperation with the intercultural therapy centre Nafsiyat. These seminars were invested in the social mission of psychoanalysis, and were intended not only for psychotherapists but for social workers, counsellors, psychiatrists, probation officers, community health workers, teachers and others. The author reflects on psychotherapy as an ecosystem and on the issue of the ‘boundaries’ of psychoanalysis: when they are excessively policed, this limits the domain of psychoanalytic knowledge, including by undermining the legitimacy of social clinics.","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3366/pah.2022.0444","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

In this reflection the author makes connections between the themes of the special issue and an early series of seminars held at the Freud Museum London, in 1992, ‘Psychotherapy Black and White’, organized in cooperation with the intercultural therapy centre Nafsiyat. These seminars were invested in the social mission of psychoanalysis, and were intended not only for psychotherapists but for social workers, counsellors, psychiatrists, probation officers, community health workers, teachers and others. The author reflects on psychotherapy as an ecosystem and on the issue of the ‘boundaries’ of psychoanalysis: when they are excessively policed, this limits the domain of psychoanalytic knowledge, including by undermining the legitimacy of social clinics.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
社会诊所和分析边界
在这个反思中,作者将特刊的主题与1992年在伦敦弗洛伊德博物馆与跨文化治疗中心Nafsiyat合作举办的早期系列研讨会“黑白心理治疗”联系起来。这些研讨会投资于精神分析的社会使命,不仅面向心理治疗师,而且面向社会工作者、顾问、精神科医生、缓刑官员、社区保健工作者、教师和其他人员。作者反思了心理治疗作为一个生态系统和精神分析的“边界”问题:当他们被过度监管时,这限制了精神分析知识的领域,包括破坏社会诊所的合法性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1