Digital Platforms in China and Europe: Legal Challenges

IF 0.2 Q4 LAW BRICS Law Journal Pub Date : 2021-10-26 DOI:10.21684/2412-2343-2021-8-3-121-147
Y. Kharitonova, L. Sannikova
{"title":"Digital Platforms in China and Europe: Legal Challenges","authors":"Y. Kharitonova, L. Sannikova","doi":"10.21684/2412-2343-2021-8-3-121-147","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The paper considers the processes of platformatization of the economy and public government, which have become the last decade’s primary trend. Analysis of the digital markets in Russia, China, and Europe proved the dominance of the digital platforms of large technology companies. According to the authors, the concentration of market power in digital platforms threatens a competitive environment in digital markets. In this regard, the demand for antitrust regulation of their activities is justified. Another legal challenge arises concerning the trend of creating public services on the digital platforms of large technology companies. The paper analyzes China’s experience in the platformatization of legal proceedings, where the process of establishing online courts is conducted in close cooperation with the leading digital platforms of the PRC. In contrast to China, in Russia, the main focus is on combining public services, and information systems of various departments within a single platform to provide public services, with large technology companies acting as operators. Therefore, the authors conclude that it is necessary to strengthen legal mechanisms to protect citizens’ rights and interests during the digitization of public services – primarily citizens’ rights to data protection. The problems revealed demonstrate the necessity of a balanced approach to the legal regulation of digital platforms. While it is important to stimulate their development, it is necessary to limit the opportunities for violating the rights and interests of other participants in the digital environment.","PeriodicalId":41782,"journal":{"name":"BRICS Law Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BRICS Law Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21684/2412-2343-2021-8-3-121-147","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

The paper considers the processes of platformatization of the economy and public government, which have become the last decade’s primary trend. Analysis of the digital markets in Russia, China, and Europe proved the dominance of the digital platforms of large technology companies. According to the authors, the concentration of market power in digital platforms threatens a competitive environment in digital markets. In this regard, the demand for antitrust regulation of their activities is justified. Another legal challenge arises concerning the trend of creating public services on the digital platforms of large technology companies. The paper analyzes China’s experience in the platformatization of legal proceedings, where the process of establishing online courts is conducted in close cooperation with the leading digital platforms of the PRC. In contrast to China, in Russia, the main focus is on combining public services, and information systems of various departments within a single platform to provide public services, with large technology companies acting as operators. Therefore, the authors conclude that it is necessary to strengthen legal mechanisms to protect citizens’ rights and interests during the digitization of public services – primarily citizens’ rights to data protection. The problems revealed demonstrate the necessity of a balanced approach to the legal regulation of digital platforms. While it is important to stimulate their development, it is necessary to limit the opportunities for violating the rights and interests of other participants in the digital environment.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
中国和欧洲的数字平台:法律挑战
本文考虑了经济和公共政府平台化的过程,这已成为过去十年的主要趋势。对俄罗斯、中国和欧洲数字市场的分析证明了大型科技公司数字平台的主导地位。根据作者的说法,市场力量集中在数字平台上威胁着数字市场的竞争环境。在这方面,对其活动进行反垄断监管的要求是合理的。另一个法律挑战涉及在大型科技公司的数字平台上创建公共服务的趋势。本文分析了中国在法律诉讼平台化方面的经验,即建立在线法院的过程是与中国领先的数字平台密切合作进行的。与中国相比,在俄罗斯,主要关注的是将公共服务和各部门的信息系统结合在一个平台内,以提供公共服务,大型科技公司充当运营商。因此,作者得出结论,在公共服务数字化过程中,有必要加强保护公民权益的法律机制,主要是公民的数据保护权。所揭示的问题表明了对数字平台进行法律监管的平衡方法的必要性。虽然刺激他们的发展很重要,但有必要限制在数字环境中侵犯其他参与者权益的机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
25.00%
发文量
22
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: The BRICS is an acronym for an association of Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa, evolved from mere investment lingo to an organized network, in the process assuming a greater geopolitical role aimed at institutional reforms that shift global power. All five countries adhere to principles of inclusive macroeconomic and social policies and are focusing on responsible national growth strategies. The BRICS Law Journal is a platform for relevant comparative research and legal development not only in and between the BRICS countries themselves but also between those countries and others. The journal is an open forum for legal scholars and practitioners to reflect on issues that are relevant to the BRICS and internationally significant. Prospective authors who are involved in relevant legal research, legal writing and legal development are, therefore, the main source of potential contributions.
期刊最新文献
The System of Indigenous Peoples’ Protection in BRICS States: An Overview of Legal and Litigation Support Legal Status of Artificial Intelligence from Quantum-Theoretic Perspective A Comparative Study of Domestic Violence in BRICS Nations – Pre and Post COVID-19 Digital Transformation Challenges to the Tax Security of the State in Russia and Other BRICS Countries A Study of the Availability and Demand of Digital Services for the Manifestation of Social and Political Activity by Citizens
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1