An evaluation of sensory processing training on the competence, confidence and practice of teachers working with children with autism

Q3 Health Professions Irish Journal of Occupational Therapy Pub Date : 2019-05-07 DOI:10.1108/IJOT-01-2019-0001
A. Ruttledge, J. Cathcart
{"title":"An evaluation of sensory processing training on the competence, confidence and practice of teachers working with children with autism","authors":"A. Ruttledge, J. Cathcart","doi":"10.1108/IJOT-01-2019-0001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nAt present, there is no research to support teachers’ use of sensory interventions in the classroom. This study aims to investigate the extent to how participation in a sensory processing training session would improve teachers’ competence, confidence and practice towards supporting children with autism.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nA pilot study design with mixed qualitative and quantitative methods was used to evaluate the impact of sensory processing training on six teachers who taught at least one child with autism in a mainstream school. The Autism Education Trust Competency Framework and face-to-face semi-structured interviews were completed with participants both pre (Time 1) and post (Time 2) training session.\n\n\nFindings\nQuantitative findings presented statistically significant differences (p < 0.05) in results with large effect sizes in the areas of confidence, knowledge, implementing sensory strategies, adjusting sensory environments, reviewing and reflecting. Qualitative data provided by participants corroborated this and indicated a need for further and more detailed training in the area. There was no change in the practice of teachers consulting with pupils about their sensory needs.\n\n\nPractical implications\nThis study found that the attendance of teachers at sensory processing training is justified and the promotion of sensory processing training is therefore warranted.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nFindings of this pilot study indicate that sensory processing training for teachers does improve competence, confidence and practice towards supporting children with autism. Review of the session to allow more detail, including consulting with the children themselves, is recommended.\n","PeriodicalId":36571,"journal":{"name":"Irish Journal of Occupational Therapy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1108/IJOT-01-2019-0001","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Irish Journal of Occupational Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOT-01-2019-0001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Health Professions","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Purpose At present, there is no research to support teachers’ use of sensory interventions in the classroom. This study aims to investigate the extent to how participation in a sensory processing training session would improve teachers’ competence, confidence and practice towards supporting children with autism. Design/methodology/approach A pilot study design with mixed qualitative and quantitative methods was used to evaluate the impact of sensory processing training on six teachers who taught at least one child with autism in a mainstream school. The Autism Education Trust Competency Framework and face-to-face semi-structured interviews were completed with participants both pre (Time 1) and post (Time 2) training session. Findings Quantitative findings presented statistically significant differences (p < 0.05) in results with large effect sizes in the areas of confidence, knowledge, implementing sensory strategies, adjusting sensory environments, reviewing and reflecting. Qualitative data provided by participants corroborated this and indicated a need for further and more detailed training in the area. There was no change in the practice of teachers consulting with pupils about their sensory needs. Practical implications This study found that the attendance of teachers at sensory processing training is justified and the promotion of sensory processing training is therefore warranted. Originality/value Findings of this pilot study indicate that sensory processing training for teachers does improve competence, confidence and practice towards supporting children with autism. Review of the session to allow more detail, including consulting with the children themselves, is recommended.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
感觉处理训练对自闭症儿童教师能力、信心和实践的影响
目的目前,还没有研究支持教师在课堂上使用感官干预。本研究旨在调查参与感官处理培训课程将在多大程度上提高教师支持自闭症儿童的能力、信心和实践。设计/方法/方法采用定性和定量相结合的试点研究设计,评估感官处理培训对六名在主流学校教过至少一名自闭症儿童的教师的影响。自闭症教育信任能力框架和面对面半结构化访谈是在培训前(时间1)和培训后(时间2)对参与者进行的。结果定量研究结果在信心、知识、实施感觉策略、调整感觉环境、回顾和反思等领域具有较大影响大小的结果存在统计学显著差异(p<0.05)。参与者提供的定性数据证实了这一点,并表明需要在该领域进行进一步和更详细的培训。教师咨询学生感官需求的做法没有改变。实践意义本研究发现,教师参加感觉加工培训是合理的,因此有必要促进感觉加工培训。独创性/价值这项试点研究的结果表明,教师的感官处理培训确实提高了支持自闭症儿童的能力、信心和实践。建议对会议进行审查,以便了解更多细节,包括与儿童本人协商。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Irish Journal of Occupational Therapy
Irish Journal of Occupational Therapy Health Professions-Occupational Therapy
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊最新文献
Editorial: Driving innovation: harnessing the power of patient input in research Current clinical practice of Irish physiotherapists and occupational therapists in the assessment and treatment of spasticity in adults Scoping review of free evidence summary sources available online, relevant to occupational therapists working with children/youth, and families Exploring the non-vocational outcomes of the individual placement and support (IPS) employment model Attention Autism™ training for occupational therapists: a pilot study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1