The Effect of Rehabilitation Intervention on Pain, Strength, Range of Motion, Hand Function and Quality of Life Patients with Upper Extremity Fracture - A Systematic Review

Thomas Erwin Christian Junus Huwae, Panji Sananta, Made Suariastawa Putra, Mochammad Ridwan, Vivid Prety Anggraini, Agung Riyanto Budi Santoso, Satria Pandu Persada Isma
{"title":"The Effect of Rehabilitation Intervention on Pain, Strength, Range of Motion, Hand Function and Quality of Life Patients with Upper Extremity Fracture - A Systematic Review","authors":"Thomas Erwin Christian Junus Huwae, Panji Sananta, Made Suariastawa Putra, Mochammad Ridwan, Vivid Prety Anggraini, Agung Riyanto Budi Santoso, Satria Pandu Persada Isma","doi":"10.14260/jemds.v11i12.267","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND \nThe rehabilitation intervention for upper extremity fracture varies from shoulder to finger, obtained from physical modalities and exercise. Physical modality and exercise rehabilitation intervention effectively reduce pain, increase range of motion (ROM), hand function and improve quality of life. This systematic review aims to synthesize current scientific knowledge on rehabilitative interventions with a specific focus on upper extremity fractures and the effect of all interventions on the patient. \nMETHODS \nThree scholarly databases (PubMed, Google Scholar, Science Direct) were systematically searched. Literature published before 10 January 2022 focused on upper extremity fracture and rehabilitation treatment patients. Quality assessment was completed with CEBM tools by Oxford University. For PICO, The Population was upper extremity fractures, and the intervention was rehabilitation intervention, both physical modality and exercise. The comparation was other rehabilitation interventions or without rehabilitation, and the outcome in this study were measured with the visual analogue scale (VAS), ROM, hand function, and quality of life (QoL). \nRESULTS \nEight studies were included in this review among 18.326 reference titles founded and screened. All of the studies had various sample sizes followed by bias analysis with CEBM tools. Rehabilitation for elbow fracture was dynamic fixation using rigid tape and proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation stretching. Rehabilitation for distal radius fracture was scapular exercise, graded motor imagery, hot pack on hand volume, illusory kinesthesia, and wrist exercise. These interventions can reduce the pain, improve strength, range of motion, hand function and quality of life in upper extremity fracture patients. \nCONCLUSIONS \nExercise and physical modality rehabilitation intervention have proven to reduce pain, improve strength, range of motion, hand function and quality of life in upper extremity fracture patients.","PeriodicalId":47072,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Evolution of Medical and Dental Sciences-JEMDS","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Evolution of Medical and Dental Sciences-JEMDS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14260/jemds.v11i12.267","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BACKGROUND The rehabilitation intervention for upper extremity fracture varies from shoulder to finger, obtained from physical modalities and exercise. Physical modality and exercise rehabilitation intervention effectively reduce pain, increase range of motion (ROM), hand function and improve quality of life. This systematic review aims to synthesize current scientific knowledge on rehabilitative interventions with a specific focus on upper extremity fractures and the effect of all interventions on the patient. METHODS Three scholarly databases (PubMed, Google Scholar, Science Direct) were systematically searched. Literature published before 10 January 2022 focused on upper extremity fracture and rehabilitation treatment patients. Quality assessment was completed with CEBM tools by Oxford University. For PICO, The Population was upper extremity fractures, and the intervention was rehabilitation intervention, both physical modality and exercise. The comparation was other rehabilitation interventions or without rehabilitation, and the outcome in this study were measured with the visual analogue scale (VAS), ROM, hand function, and quality of life (QoL). RESULTS Eight studies were included in this review among 18.326 reference titles founded and screened. All of the studies had various sample sizes followed by bias analysis with CEBM tools. Rehabilitation for elbow fracture was dynamic fixation using rigid tape and proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation stretching. Rehabilitation for distal radius fracture was scapular exercise, graded motor imagery, hot pack on hand volume, illusory kinesthesia, and wrist exercise. These interventions can reduce the pain, improve strength, range of motion, hand function and quality of life in upper extremity fracture patients. CONCLUSIONS Exercise and physical modality rehabilitation intervention have proven to reduce pain, improve strength, range of motion, hand function and quality of life in upper extremity fracture patients.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
康复干预对上肢骨折患者疼痛、力量、活动范围、手功能和生活质量的影响
背景上肢骨折的康复干预从肩部到手指各不相同,可从身体方式和锻炼中获得。物理方式和运动康复干预有效减轻疼痛,增加活动范围(ROM),手部功能,提高生活质量。本系统综述旨在综合当前关于康复干预的科学知识,特别关注上肢骨折和所有干预措施对患者的影响。方法系统检索PubMed、Google Scholar、Science Direct三个学术数据库。2022年1月10日之前发表的文献集中于上肢骨折和康复治疗患者。质量评估由牛津大学使用CEBM工具完成。对于PICO,人群是上肢骨折,干预是康复干预,包括身体方式和锻炼。比较其他康复干预措施或不进行康复,并用视觉模拟量表(VAS)、ROM、手功能和生活质量(QoL)测量本研究的结果。结果在建立和筛选的18326篇参考文献中,有8项研究被纳入本综述。所有的研究都有不同的样本量,然后用CEBM工具进行偏差分析。肘部骨折的康复是使用刚性带和本体感觉神经肌肉促进拉伸进行动态固定。桡骨远端骨折的康复包括肩胛骨运动、分级运动成像、手部容积热敷、虚幻动觉和手腕运动。这些干预措施可以减轻上肢骨折患者的疼痛,改善力量、活动范围、手功能和生活质量。结论运动和物理康复干预已被证明可以减轻上肢骨折患者的疼痛,改善力量、活动范围、手功能和生活质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
180
期刊最新文献
Emphysematous Pyelonephritis with Extension of Air in the Inferior Vena Cava Cytomorphological Pattern of Neoplastic and Non-Neoplastic Breast Lesions - An Institutional Experience of a Rural Tertiary Care Center Nephrotic Syndrome in Pregnancy - Case Reports Case Report - Trauma Induced Vernet’s Syndrome Leptomeningeal Metastases in Carcinoma Rectum with Extensive Skeletal Metastasis - A Case Report
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1