The Arrival Of The New Beps Pe Clause In Actual Tax Treaties Via The Mli: Impact, Risks And Need For Further Regulatory Changes (Particular Focus On Spain)

IF 0.8 Q2 LAW Intertax Pub Date : 2023-05-01 DOI:10.54648/taxi2023034
Eva Escribano
{"title":"The Arrival Of The New Beps Pe Clause In Actual Tax Treaties Via The Mli: Impact, Risks And Need For Further Regulatory Changes (Particular Focus On Spain)","authors":"Eva Escribano","doi":"10.54648/taxi2023034","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The present article seeks to analyse the overall potential impact that the new permanent establishment (hereinafter PE) concept that has emerged from the Base Erosion and Profit Shifting (hereinafter BEPS) Project is expected to have as it is gradually incorporated into actual tax treaties worldwide by using Spain as an illustrative example. Firstly, the role that the Multilateral Convention to Implement Tax Treaty Related Measures to Prevent BEPS (hereinafter MLI) is playing in the implementation of the new rule in tax treaties will be analysed (section 1). Secondly, the wording and scope of the new PE clause will be scrutinized, highlighting its obvious resemblance to ideas foreseen in both prior versions of the Commentaries to the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development Model Convention (hereinafter OECD MC) and certain domestic administrative resolutions and judgments (e.g., the ‘Spanish PE approach’, a doctrine widely held by the Spanish tax administration and some courts advocating for a singular interpretation of the PE clause and the rules attributing profits to it) (section 2). Thirdly, there will be an attempt to advance the effects of the arrival of the new clause in actual tax treaties in terms of the expected volume of affected treaties, the expected reaction of tax administrations and courts (in respect of unaffected treaties keeping the classic version of the PE concept), the potential coexistence between the new treaty PE rule and current domestic PE rules and, lastly, the expected (extra) tax revenues for jurisdictions hosting these new forms of PEs (section 3). The intention throughout the contribution is to portray the risks derived from the implementation of this new rule and the need for further regulatory modifications to counteract such risks. Finally, some final remarks will be put forward (section 4).\nDigital nomads’, work mobility, international taxation, tax residence, employment income, digital economy","PeriodicalId":45365,"journal":{"name":"Intertax","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Intertax","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54648/taxi2023034","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The present article seeks to analyse the overall potential impact that the new permanent establishment (hereinafter PE) concept that has emerged from the Base Erosion and Profit Shifting (hereinafter BEPS) Project is expected to have as it is gradually incorporated into actual tax treaties worldwide by using Spain as an illustrative example. Firstly, the role that the Multilateral Convention to Implement Tax Treaty Related Measures to Prevent BEPS (hereinafter MLI) is playing in the implementation of the new rule in tax treaties will be analysed (section 1). Secondly, the wording and scope of the new PE clause will be scrutinized, highlighting its obvious resemblance to ideas foreseen in both prior versions of the Commentaries to the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development Model Convention (hereinafter OECD MC) and certain domestic administrative resolutions and judgments (e.g., the ‘Spanish PE approach’, a doctrine widely held by the Spanish tax administration and some courts advocating for a singular interpretation of the PE clause and the rules attributing profits to it) (section 2). Thirdly, there will be an attempt to advance the effects of the arrival of the new clause in actual tax treaties in terms of the expected volume of affected treaties, the expected reaction of tax administrations and courts (in respect of unaffected treaties keeping the classic version of the PE concept), the potential coexistence between the new treaty PE rule and current domestic PE rules and, lastly, the expected (extra) tax revenues for jurisdictions hosting these new forms of PEs (section 3). The intention throughout the contribution is to portray the risks derived from the implementation of this new rule and the need for further regulatory modifications to counteract such risks. Finally, some final remarks will be put forward (section 4). Digital nomads’, work mobility, international taxation, tax residence, employment income, digital economy
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
通过Mli在实际税收协定中引入新的Beps Pe条款:影响、风险和进一步监管改革的必要性(特别关注西班牙)
本文试图以西班牙为例,分析从基地侵蚀和利润转移(以下简称BEPS)项目中产生的新常设机构(以下简称PE)概念在逐渐纳入全球实际税收条约时预计会产生的总体潜在影响。首先,将分析《实施税收条约相关措施以防止BEPS的多边公约》(以下简称《多边公约》)在实施税收条约新规则方面发挥的作用(第1节)。其次,将仔细审查新PE条款的措辞和范围,强调其与《经济合作与发展组织示范公约》(以下简称经合组织《示范公约》)先前版本的评注和某些国内行政决议和判决中设想的想法明显相似(例如,“西班牙PE方法”,这是西班牙税务管理部门和一些法院广泛持有的一种学说,主张对PE条款和利润归属规则进行单一解释)(第2节)。第三,将试图从受影响条约的预期数量、税务管理部门和法院的预期反应(就保留PE概念的经典版本的未受影响条约而言)、新条约PE规则与当前国内PE规则之间的潜在共存以及,最后,托管这些新形式PE的司法管辖区的预期(额外)税收(第3节)。整个贡献的意图是描述实施这一新规则所产生的风险,以及进一步修改监管以抵消此类风险的必要性。最后,对数字游牧民、工作流动性、国际税收、税收居住地、就业收入、数字经济等问题进行了总结(第4节)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Intertax
Intertax LAW-
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
50.00%
发文量
45
期刊最新文献
(In)congruence Between Taxation, Spending, and Representation: The Ambiguous Character of Tax-based Contributions Taxing Powers of the European Union Judicial Review of the EU Own Resources Decision by the ECJ Protecting EU Financial Interests in the Collection of Tax-Based Own Resources Article: Conflicts between Directives that Require Taxation of Income and Tax Treaties: The Effectiveness of the EU Primacy-based Conflict Rule
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1