Autologous Stem Cell Collection after Daratumumab, Bortezomib, Thalidomide, and Dexamethasone versus Bortezomib, Cyclophosphamide, and Dexamethasone in Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma.

IF 16.4 1区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Accounts of Chemical Research Pub Date : 2023-03-24 eCollection Date: 2023-10-01 DOI:10.1159/000529691
Sandra Sauer, Katharina Kriegsmann, Cathleen Nientiedt, Anita Schmitt, Carsten Müller-Tidow, Marc-Steffen Raab, Joseph Kauer
{"title":"Autologous Stem Cell Collection after Daratumumab, Bortezomib, Thalidomide, and Dexamethasone versus Bortezomib, Cyclophosphamide, and Dexamethasone in Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma.","authors":"Sandra Sauer, Katharina Kriegsmann, Cathleen Nientiedt, Anita Schmitt, Carsten Müller-Tidow, Marc-Steffen Raab, Joseph Kauer","doi":"10.1159/000529691","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>In transplant-eligible, newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) patients, autologous peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) collection is usually pursued after induction therapy. While induction regimens are constantly refined regarding response, their impact on PBSC collection is not fully studied. The inclusion of the anti-CD38 antibody daratumumab into induction therapy significantly improved outcomes for patients with NDMM, e.g., as part of the daratumumab, bortezomib, thalidomide, and dexamethasone (Dara-VTD) protocol. Preliminary data from the phase 3 CASSIOPEIA study proved the efficacy of Dara-VTD. While overall PBSC collection upon addition of daratumumab was reduced in the study population, more detailed analyses on the impact are missing.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We here report on PBSC mobilization and collection metrics in <i>n</i> = 119 patients with NDMM who underwent induction therapy with bortezomib, cyclophosphamide, and dexamethasone (VCD, <i>n</i> = 61) or Dara-VTD (<i>n</i> = 58).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patient characteristics were well balanced between groups. The Dara-VTD group showed improved response parameters with 66% of patients reaching at least very good partial response versus 54% in the VCD group. Dara-VTD patients exhibited inferior mobilization metrics such as peripheral blood CD34<sup>+</sup> cell count at the first leukapheresis (LP) session (65 vs. 106/μL, <i>p</i> = 0.001), median number of LP sessions (2 vs. 1, <i>p</i> = 0.001), and PBSC collection at first LP (5.5 vs. 8.3 × 10<sup>6</sup>/kg body weight [bw], <i>p</i> = 0.001). Utilization of plerixafor was slightly higher after Dara-VTD (33% vs. 21% of patients, <i>p</i> = 0.143). The overall PBSC collection result was significantly lower after Dara-VTD (8.4 vs. 9.6 × 10<sup>6</sup>/kg bw, <i>p</i> = 0.026). 78% and 85% of patients successfully collected 3 transplants with ≥2 × 10<sup>6</sup> CD34<sup>+</sup> cells/kg bw in the Dara-VTD and the VCD groups, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In summary, Dara-VTD, possibly due to both anti-CD38 antibody and thalidomide exposure, imposes a limitation on PBSC collection which can be only partly overcome by utilization of plerixafor.</p>","PeriodicalId":1,"journal":{"name":"Accounts of Chemical Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":16.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10626396/pdf/","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounts of Chemical Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000529691","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/10/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Introduction: In transplant-eligible, newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) patients, autologous peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) collection is usually pursued after induction therapy. While induction regimens are constantly refined regarding response, their impact on PBSC collection is not fully studied. The inclusion of the anti-CD38 antibody daratumumab into induction therapy significantly improved outcomes for patients with NDMM, e.g., as part of the daratumumab, bortezomib, thalidomide, and dexamethasone (Dara-VTD) protocol. Preliminary data from the phase 3 CASSIOPEIA study proved the efficacy of Dara-VTD. While overall PBSC collection upon addition of daratumumab was reduced in the study population, more detailed analyses on the impact are missing.

Methods: We here report on PBSC mobilization and collection metrics in n = 119 patients with NDMM who underwent induction therapy with bortezomib, cyclophosphamide, and dexamethasone (VCD, n = 61) or Dara-VTD (n = 58).

Results: Patient characteristics were well balanced between groups. The Dara-VTD group showed improved response parameters with 66% of patients reaching at least very good partial response versus 54% in the VCD group. Dara-VTD patients exhibited inferior mobilization metrics such as peripheral blood CD34+ cell count at the first leukapheresis (LP) session (65 vs. 106/μL, p = 0.001), median number of LP sessions (2 vs. 1, p = 0.001), and PBSC collection at first LP (5.5 vs. 8.3 × 106/kg body weight [bw], p = 0.001). Utilization of plerixafor was slightly higher after Dara-VTD (33% vs. 21% of patients, p = 0.143). The overall PBSC collection result was significantly lower after Dara-VTD (8.4 vs. 9.6 × 106/kg bw, p = 0.026). 78% and 85% of patients successfully collected 3 transplants with ≥2 × 106 CD34+ cells/kg bw in the Dara-VTD and the VCD groups, respectively.

Conclusion: In summary, Dara-VTD, possibly due to both anti-CD38 antibody and thalidomide exposure, imposes a limitation on PBSC collection which can be only partly overcome by utilization of plerixafor.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Daratumumab、硼替佐米、沙利度胺和地塞米松对新诊断的多发性骨髓瘤的自体干细胞采集
引言:在符合移植条件的新诊断的多发性骨髓瘤(NDMM)患者中,通常在诱导治疗后进行自体外周血干细胞(PBSC)采集。虽然诱导方案在反应方面不断完善,但其对多能干细胞收集的影响尚未得到充分研究。将抗CD38抗体daratumumab纳入诱导治疗显著改善了NDMM患者的预后,例如,作为Daratumuab、硼替佐米、沙利度胺和地塞米松(Dara-VTD)方案的一部分。CASSIOPEIA 3期研究的初步数据证明了Dara VTD的疗效。虽然在研究人群中,添加达拉图单抗后的多溴联苯醚总收集量有所减少,但缺乏对其影响的更详细分析。方法:我们报告了119例接受硼替佐米、环磷酰胺和地塞米松(VCD,n=61)或Dara VTD(n=58)诱导治疗的NDMM患者的PBSC动员和收集指标。结果:患者特征在各组之间得到了很好的平衡。Dara VTD组显示出改善的反应参数,66%的患者达到至少非常好的部分反应,而VCD组为54%。Dara VTD患者在第一次白血病(LP)治疗时表现出较差的动员指标,如外周血CD34+细胞计数(65 vs.106/μL,p=0.001)、LP治疗的中位数(2 vs.1,p=0.001)、,和第一次LP时的PBSC收集(5.5 vs.8.3×106/kg体重[bw],p=0.001)。在Dara VTD后,普乐沙福的利用率略高(33%vs.21%的患者,p=0.013)。Dara VTD后,总体PBSC收集结果显著降低(8.4 vs.9.6×106/kg bw,p=0.026)。78%和85%的患者在Dara VTD和VCD组。结论:总之,Dara VTD可能是由于抗CD38抗体和沙利度胺暴露,对PBSC的收集造成了限制,而使用普利沙福只能部分克服这一限制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Accounts of Chemical Research
Accounts of Chemical Research 化学-化学综合
CiteScore
31.40
自引率
1.10%
发文量
312
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Accounts of Chemical Research presents short, concise and critical articles offering easy-to-read overviews of basic research and applications in all areas of chemistry and biochemistry. These short reviews focus on research from the author’s own laboratory and are designed to teach the reader about a research project. In addition, Accounts of Chemical Research publishes commentaries that give an informed opinion on a current research problem. Special Issues online are devoted to a single topic of unusual activity and significance. Accounts of Chemical Research replaces the traditional article abstract with an article "Conspectus." These entries synopsize the research affording the reader a closer look at the content and significance of an article. Through this provision of a more detailed description of the article contents, the Conspectus enhances the article's discoverability by search engines and the exposure for the research.
期刊最新文献
Management of Cholesteatoma: Hearing Rehabilitation. Congenital Cholesteatoma. Evaluation of Cholesteatoma. Management of Cholesteatoma: Extension Beyond Middle Ear/Mastoid. Recidivism and Recurrence.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1